IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?

By: Anon (no.delete@this.spam.com), May 10, 2021 8:08 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on May 10, 2021 6:26 pm wrote:
> It's clear that Intel, Samsung, and TSMC already have Gate all around processes under
> developement. IBM has completed the research phase, but they don't do their own production
> any more and GF has kind of given up. So they need to find a customer.

Didn't GF licensed EUV?
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?David Kanter2021/05/10 05:26 PM
  IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?John H2021/05/10 06:20 PM
  IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Mark Roulo2021/05/10 06:55 PM
  IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Anon2021/05/10 08:08 PM
  IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Adrian2021/05/10 09:34 PM
  IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Etienne Lorrain2021/05/10 11:49 PM
    IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?David Hess2021/05/11 04:05 AM
    structured ASICsDavid Kanter2021/05/11 06:08 AM
    IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Adrian2021/05/11 07:05 AM
      IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Kester L2021/05/11 07:22 AM
        IBM's "2nm" Gate-all-around - will it matter?Adrian2021/05/11 10:31 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?