Shared FPU wasn't BD's problem

By: anonymou5 (no.delete@this.spam.com), August 31, 2021 2:09 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Anon (no.delete@this.spam.com) on August 31, 2021 2:06 am wrote:
> Adrian (a.delete@this.acm.org) on August 31, 2021 1:27 am wrote:
> > If it would have been marketed realistically, it might have been much more successful, because there
> > were enough cases when it made sense to buy a BD for decent performance at a lower price.
>
> At least they would save $12.5 millions
> https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-fx-bulldozer-false-advertising-class-action-lawsuit-eight-cores-settlement,40256.html

Had BD/PD/SR/XV been wildly successful we probably wouldn't have gotten Zen though. :-D
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
AVX512 as co-processorMichael S2021/08/29 03:13 AM
  AVX512 as co-processor-.-2021/08/29 04:05 AM
    Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemChester2021/08/30 01:03 PM
      Excellent post (NT)Heikki Kultala2021/08/30 01:34 PM
      Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemP Snip2021/08/30 01:53 PM
      Shared FPU wasn't BD's problem-.-2021/08/30 05:47 PM
      Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemDavid Kanter2021/08/30 10:29 PM
        Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemChester2021/08/31 02:58 AM
          Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemDavid Kanter2021/08/31 09:28 AM
            Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemChester2021/08/31 12:29 PM
            Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemRayla2021/08/31 02:34 PM
      Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemAnon2021/08/31 12:28 AM
        Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemAdrian2021/08/31 01:27 AM
          Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemAnon2021/08/31 02:06 AM
            Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemanonymou52021/08/31 02:09 PM
              Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemChester2021/09/01 11:05 AM
      Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemKevin G2021/08/31 09:39 AM
        Shared FPU wasn't BD's problemChester2021/09/01 10:03 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell tangerine? 🍊