Quick shutdown?

By: Andrei F (andrei.delete@this.anandtech.com), September 17, 2021 1:35 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on September 16, 2021 12:04 pm wrote:
> Andrei F (andrei.delete@this.anandtech.com) on September 16, 2021 8:12 am wrote:
> > David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com) on September 15, 2021 11:46 am wrote:
> > > > > Isn't the point to deliver max perf with min energy?
> > > >
> > > > The point is that your window of user experience is 16/8ms. If the workload completes
> > > > interactively to fill that "QoS" at the current frequency without going over a utilisation
> > > > threshold in that sliding window, you *do not want to go any higher*.
> > >
> > >
> > > Wouldn't you want to run at lower voltage/frequency if possible?
> >
> > My point is you're already running at the lowest frequency without failing to deliver the QoS/frame.
> > If the performance window is smaller, then you'd be running at higher frequencies to service the
> > higher load periods, and low frequencies during lower load periods, which costs more energy than
> > running medium frequency the whole time and spreading out the load over the frame.
>
> My point is that even within 10ms, the optimal voltage will
> probably vary quite a bit (assuming fixed frequency).

Are you alluding to vdroop? This is a completely different discussion. The margins for efficiency gains are an order of magnitude lower than actual V/F switching.

>
> > >
> > > Generally the point is changing V/F should be inexpensive to enable using the optimal V/F combo.
> > >
> > > > So your 120MHz FIVR is completely and utterly pointless. You would be wasting energy at higher
> > > > voltages for no gain in user performance.
> > >
> > > Shifting to low voltage fast seems valuable, right?
> >
> > It doesn't because of the above reasons. You should be running
> > at the "just right" F/V servicing the workload.
>
> Let's say you are running at 2GHz. 8ms is 16M cycles. The 'best' voltage will
> vary over those 16M cycles based on activity in the chip, temperature, etc.

We already have these mechanisms in products right now / vdroop / temperature DVS. Yes you can have DVS that goes infinitely fast and does envelope tracking to the load. But that's a layer that sits underneath the DVFS logic.

>
> > > > Fmax should only every be reached and triggered after
> > > > continuous load of 2-3x of user experience window - current mobile phones do that in around 40-50ms,
> > > > anything faster than that is waste of energy and battery life. These are not HW limitations, but
> > > > learning the hard way what the most efficient way to design battery powered DVFS logic.
> > >
> > > Would that change if V/F switch took nanoseconds and cost little energy?
> > >
> > > Seems like you would want to dynamically adjust voltage...even if at fixed frequency.
> > >
> > > David
> >
> > If it would take nanoseconds to change V/F then all you're doing is having two states - Fmax and Fmin.
> > A that point Fmin becomes meaningless as a state and it's better to just clock gate/power gate. Your
> > most prevalent state in which you do computation would be Fmax and you defeat the purpose of DVFS.
>
> Well voltage can change quite rapidly. I think Intel's FIVR is around 1V
> in 0.5us. So if you wanted to change 50mV, that's probably quite quick.
>
> David

Again, I agree, but it's a different discussion topic. Currently vendors can't even rationalise dedicated voltage rails much less something like a FIVR - Qualcomm notes they use 1+3 on the same voltage rail because the increased capacitance of the larger rail brings more benefits than a dedicated rail. 50mV is an extremely excessive swing at constant frequency, but I guess it could happen on very high power cores, but that's a different market segment.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
alder lake.inteluser2021/09/10 01:52 AM
  alder lake.Andrei F2021/09/10 09:31 AM
    alder lake.Andrey2021/09/10 09:38 AM
      alder lake.rwessel2021/09/10 11:18 AM
      alder lake.Andrei F2021/09/10 12:49 PM
        alder lake.Andrey2021/09/10 04:12 PM
          alder lake.David Hess2021/09/10 07:39 PM
            alder lake.Andrey2021/09/11 12:28 AM
        alder lake.---2021/09/10 05:24 PM
          alder lake.Andrei F2021/09/12 01:09 AM
            DVFSDavid Kanter2021/09/12 09:58 PM
              DVFSAndrei F2021/09/13 01:02 AM
                DVFSAnon2021/09/13 03:28 AM
                DVFSJukka Larja2021/09/13 05:35 AM
                  DVFSAndrei F2021/09/14 12:07 AM
                    DVFSJukka Larja2021/09/14 04:11 AM
                      DVFSAndrei F2021/09/14 07:55 AM
                        DVFSJukka Larja2021/09/14 10:23 AM
                DVFS---2021/09/13 10:19 AM
                  DVFSDoug S2021/09/13 10:57 AM
                    DVFSDavid Hess2021/09/13 11:32 AM
                    DVFS---2021/09/13 01:06 PM
                      DVFSDavid Hess2021/09/13 02:21 PM
                    DVFSDavid Kanter2021/09/15 03:05 PM
                  DVFSDavid Hess2021/09/13 11:46 AM
                  DVFSJukka Larja2021/09/14 04:35 AM
                Quick shutdown?David Kanter2021/09/15 10:46 AM
                  Quick shutdown?Andrei F2021/09/16 07:12 AM
                    Quick shutdown?David Kanter2021/09/16 11:04 AM
                      Quick shutdown?Andrei F2021/09/17 01:35 AM
                        Quick shutdown?Andrei F2021/09/17 01:38 AM
            and weren't 'they' right?Daniel B2021/09/13 04:20 AM
              and weren't 'they' right?Andrei F2021/09/13 04:51 AM
                and weren't 'they' right?Daniel B2021/09/13 06:29 AM
              and weren't 'they' right?anon2021/09/13 05:07 AM
                and weren't 'they' right?Jukka Larja2021/09/13 05:26 AM
                  and weren't 'they' right?anon2021/09/13 11:37 PM
              Alder Lake has no little coresHeikki Kultala2021/09/13 06:33 AM
                Alder Lake has no little coresMichael S2021/09/13 07:33 AM
                  Alder Lake has no little coresme2021/09/13 10:45 AM
                  Alder Lake has no little coresHeikki Kultala2021/09/13 01:49 PM
                    Alder Lake has no little coresanon2021/09/13 11:42 PM
                why stop at two core sizes?hobold2021/09/14 05:47 AM
                  Memory caches did this, right?Mark Roulo2021/09/14 02:51 PM
                    Memory caches did this, right?Brett2021/09/14 07:17 PM
                      Memory caches did this, right?Kevin G2021/09/16 03:10 PM
                  Large reorder buffers (L1+L2)2021/09/15 11:24 AM
                    Large reorder buffers (L1+L2)hobold2021/09/15 12:06 PM
                Alder Lake has no little coresAdrian2021/09/14 08:33 AM
              and weren't 'they' right?David Hess2021/09/13 12:00 PM
                Battery vs PerformanceMark Roulo2021/09/13 12:18 PM
                  Battery vs PerformanceDoug S2021/09/13 02:05 PM
                    Battery vs PerformanceDavid Hess2021/09/13 02:28 PM
                      Battery vs Performance---2021/09/13 05:08 PM
                      Battery vs Performance---2021/09/13 05:08 PM
                      Battery vs PerformanceDoug S2021/09/13 08:53 PM
                    Battery vs PerformanceAnon2021/09/14 06:42 AM
                and weren't 'they' right?Daniel B2021/09/13 12:57 PM
                  and weren't 'they' right?David Hess2021/09/13 02:11 PM
                    and weren't 'they' right?---2021/09/13 02:38 PM
                  and weren't 'they' right?---2021/09/13 02:32 PM
                and weren't 'they' right?Brendan2021/09/14 03:30 AM
                  and weren't 'they' right?Jukka Larja2021/09/14 04:31 AM
              and weren't 'they' right?Etienne Lorrain2021/09/14 12:29 AM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?