Cortex a710 merged core SVE

By: Kara (karaardalan.delete@this.gmail.com), December 1, 2021 10:32 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Arm recently updated their main (non-dev) website cortex a710 section,adding merged core with 2 cores per complex to the specifications.
Now if the motivation behind cortex a510 merged cores was to reduce silicone area by making the two cores share a single simd unit with two neon engines, then what implications would a ca710 merged core have?
Since each ca710 already has its own two 128-bit vector lanes, could this mean a merged core complex would have a single simd unit with 4 neon engines?
Maybe we can see merged cortex x_ / neoverse v_ complexes with 8 neon engines and a 1024-bit wide vector register capable of implementing massive yet cost effective SVE2 vector processing.
 Next Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Cortex a710 merged core SVEKara2021/12/01 10:32 AM
  Cortex a710 merged core SVEKara2021/12/01 10:37 AM
    Cortex a710 merged core SVEPeter Greenhalgh2021/12/01 01:56 PM
  Cortex a710 merged core SVEGionatan Danti2021/12/02 12:58 AM
    Merged core is not bulldozerKara2021/12/02 01:27 AM
      Merged core is not bulldozerKara2021/12/02 01:35 AM
        Merged core is not bulldozerPeter Greenhalgh2021/12/02 09:25 AM
          OoO more effecient than in-orderKara2021/12/02 09:43 AM
            OoO more effecient than in-orderPeter Greenhalgh2021/12/02 02:07 PM
              OoO more effecient than in-orderAndrei F2021/12/03 01:53 AM
                OoO more effecient than in-orderPeter Greenhalgh2021/12/03 03:46 AM
                  OoO more effecient than in-orderAndrei F2021/12/04 01:14 PM
                OoO more effecient than in-orderAnon2021/12/04 05:11 AM
                  OoO more effecient than in-orderKara2021/12/04 05:32 AM
                  OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/04 05:49 AM
                    OoO more effecient than in-orderAnon2021/12/04 09:35 PM
                      OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/05 01:49 AM
                        OoO more effecient than in-orderKara2021/12/05 02:09 AM
                          OoO more effecient than in-orderKara2021/12/05 02:16 AM
                          OoO more effecient than in-order---2021/12/05 11:12 AM
                            OoO more effecient than in-orderKara2021/12/05 11:31 AM
                              OoO more effecient than in-orderBrett2021/12/05 04:40 PM
                                Gamestation CPUs?Mark Roulo2021/12/06 10:41 AM
                                  Gamestation CPUs?Brett2021/12/06 07:59 PM
                                    Gamestation CPUs?Michael S2021/12/07 02:52 AM
                                      Gamestation CPUs?Gabriele Svelto2021/12/08 08:35 AM
                                        Gamestation CPUs?Michael S2021/12/08 10:34 AM
                                      Gamestation CPUs?hobold2021/12/10 05:36 AM
                                OoO more effecient than in-orderanon22021/12/06 08:55 PM
                        OoO more effecient than in-orderAnon2021/12/05 06:13 AM
                        OoO more effecient than in-orderGabriele Svelto2021/12/06 01:40 AM
                          OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/06 03:17 AM
                            OoO more effecient than in-orderJukka Larja2021/12/06 06:32 AM
                              OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/06 06:53 AM
                                OoO more effecient than in-orderJukka Larja2021/12/06 09:03 AM
                            OoO more effecient than in-orderAnon2021/12/06 12:28 PM
                          OoO more effecient than in-orderDan Fay2021/12/06 07:44 AM
                          OoO more effecient than in-orderDoug S2021/12/06 08:18 AM
                        OoO more effecient than in-orderDavid Hess2021/12/09 04:51 AM
                          OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/09 06:04 AM
                            OoO more effecient than in-orderDavid Hess2021/12/09 06:42 AM
                              OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/09 11:21 AM
                              OoO more effecient than in-orderBrett2021/12/09 11:25 AM
                              OoO more effecient than in-orderDoug S2021/12/09 11:49 AM
                                OoO more effecient than in-orderDavid Hess2021/12/09 02:40 PM
                                  OoO more effecient than in-orderDoug S2021/12/09 08:25 PM
                                    OoO more effecient than in-orderJukka Larja2021/12/10 05:28 AM
                                    OoO more effecient than in-orderDanjel2021/12/10 06:18 AM
                                    OoO more effecient than in-orderDan Fay2021/12/11 06:41 PM
                                      OoO more effecient than in-orderDoug S2021/12/12 07:49 AM
                                    OoO more effecient than in-orderDavid Hess2021/12/13 06:10 PM
                  OoO more effecient than in-order---2021/12/05 10:59 AM
                    OoO more effecient than in-orderFoo_2021/12/05 01:40 PM
                      OoO more effecient than in-orderAnon2021/12/05 03:15 PM
                      OoO more effecient than in-order---2021/12/05 06:03 PM
      Merged core is not bulldozerAnon2021/12/02 09:35 AM
        Merged core is not bulldozerKara2021/12/02 09:56 AM
          Merged core is not bulldozeranonymou52021/12/02 10:27 AM
          AVX-512 supportJouni Matti Juhani Osmala2021/12/02 09:30 PM
            AVX-512 support-.-2021/12/03 11:35 AM
            AVX-512 supportKevin G2021/12/03 11:59 AM
              AVX-512 supportGroo2021/12/03 06:39 PM
        Merged core is not bulldozerKara2021/12/02 11:29 AM
          Merged core is not bulldozerAnon2021/12/04 09:45 PM
            Bulldozer cache (far from fine and FP (fine)Heikki Kultala2021/12/04 11:31 PM
              this exactly, not CMTChester2021/12/06 01:09 PM
                this exactly, not CMTAnon2021/12/06 01:31 PM
                  this exactly, not CMTMichael S2021/12/07 01:32 AM
                    this exactly, not CMTAnon2021/12/07 02:02 AM
                      this exactly, not CMTMichael S2021/12/07 02:36 AM
                        this exactly, not CMTAnon2021/12/07 02:56 AM
                          this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Björn Ragnar Björnsson2021/12/07 10:22 AM
                            this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Anon2021/12/07 11:27 AM
                              this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Björn Ragnar Björnsson2021/12/08 04:45 PM
                                this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Anon2021/12/08 05:01 PM
                            this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Adrian2021/12/08 02:57 AM
                              this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Dummond D. Slow2021/12/08 12:38 PM
                                this exactly, not CMT (28nm clocking)Adrian2021/12/09 03:39 AM
      Merged core is not bulldozerGionatan Danti2021/12/03 01:22 AM
        no bulldozer ever shared L1D cacheHeikki Kultala2021/12/03 02:07 AM
          no bulldozer ever shared L1D cacheGionatan Danti2021/12/03 05:42 AM
        AVX/AMX as coprocessorKara2021/12/03 02:44 AM
          discussed here not long agoMichael S2021/12/03 05:49 AM
            discussed here not long agoKara2021/12/03 05:52 AM
              discussed here not long agodmcq2021/12/03 11:40 AM
  Cortex a710 merged core (update)Kara2021/12/02 11:20 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell tangerine? 🍊