Jörn Engel (joern.delete@this.purestorage.com) on May 22, 2022 1:25 pm wrote:
> Heh! Same here. At some point I implemented expand. But the code is fairly
> tricky and I noticed that I didn't need it after all before finishing it.
Oh no :) If you are able to publish it under something other than AGPL, I'd appreciate having a look, no sense reinventing tricky wheels completely from scratch.

> Interesting. Clearly you see a lot more hardware variety than I do.
:) Like it or not, we are moving into a heterogeneous future.

> There actually isn't very much to it, people could recreate it from scratch in a couple of days.
You might be underestimating the value here. I have a list of about two dozen wrappers and their value is proportional to the number of compilers/targets/ops supported, plus all the compiler bugs they shield users from. There is a huge difference between something whipped up in a couple of days, vs something maintained for years.

> But if you know someone that wants a C vector library and doesn't mind a "here you go, have a nice
> life" attitude or might even step in as the future maintainer, send them my way.
Sure, I'll ask internally.