By: Adrian (a.delete@this.acm.org), June 3, 2022 5:26 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on June 3, 2022 4:39 am wrote:
>
> The later is actually quite troublesome for our company - we have troubles finding replacement
> for Compact PCI host SBC that supports both 64-bit PCI data bus and 32-bit Windows.
>
I believe that you should have better luck searching for a board containing a PCIe to PCI-X bridge chip, like those made by Broadcom or Diode Incorporated,instead of searching for a SBC with 64-bit PCI.
Such a bridge board could be used with any modern SBC with PCIe.
If you do not need many, you could make yourselves such bridge boards. However, looking out of curiosity at Mouser, I see that the PCI bridge ICs are in stock only for 32-bit PCI, while the models for 64-bit PCI have many thousands on order and leading times between 3/4 years and 6/4 years for new orders. Maybe at other distributors the availability is better, but at the first glance it was not encouraging.
>
> The later is actually quite troublesome for our company - we have troubles finding replacement
> for Compact PCI host SBC that supports both 64-bit PCI data bus and 32-bit Windows.
>
I believe that you should have better luck searching for a board containing a PCIe to PCI-X bridge chip, like those made by Broadcom or Diode Incorporated,instead of searching for a SBC with 64-bit PCI.
Such a bridge board could be used with any modern SBC with PCIe.
If you do not need many, you could make yourselves such bridge boards. However, looking out of curiosity at Mouser, I see that the PCI bridge ICs are in stock only for 32-bit PCI, while the models for 64-bit PCI have many thousands on order and leading times between 3/4 years and 6/4 years for new orders. Maybe at other distributors the availability is better, but at the first glance it was not encouraging.