By: Anon (no.delete@this.spam.com), June 5, 2022 2:23 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com) on June 3, 2022 6:49 am wrote:
> aarch64 code density is very good for acrippled fixed 32-bit instruction words, but it does not quite match
> Thumb2. According to my measurements, it does not even match RV64C, although it's not too far behind.
> [According to my measurements] by now undisputed champ of code density in 32/64-bit world is nanoMIPS.
> Unfortunately, it appears to be dead.
What are the numbers of your measurements?
> aarch64 code density is very good for a
> Thumb2. According to my measurements, it does not even match RV64C, although it's not too far behind.
> [According to my measurements] by now undisputed champ of code density in 32/64-bit world is nanoMIPS.
> Unfortunately, it appears to be dead.
What are the numbers of your measurements?