dmcq (dmcq.delete@this.fano.co.uk) on July 1, 2022 4:16 am wrote:
> anonymou5 (no.delete@this.spam.com) on June 30, 2022 6:19 pm wrote:
> > Anon4 (no.delete@this.example.com) on June 30, 2022 4:37 pm wrote:
> > > anonymou5 (no.delete@this.spam.com) on June 30, 2022 7:28 am wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Morello exists because Arm would be foolish not to pick up the UK research £££.
> > >
> > > Morello is part of a UK government project called Digital Security by Design and is partially
> > > funded by a pot of money called the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund administered by UKRI.
> > >
> > > The way that fund operates means ARM must have made a matching investment of a similar size to what
> > > they got from the fund from their own money. Thus no it's not just free research £££ to pickup.
> >
> > I didn't say it was free. See above for what I said (wrote). I stand by it. :)
>
> If ARM did not 'pick up the UK research £££' it would be richer and it is poorer because
> it did pick it up. So exactly where do you get 'Arm would be foolish not to pick up the
> UK research £££' from. If it got 115% of the cost it would make a profit.

Are you suggesting that Arm shouldn't have matched the UK funding and a) done Morello
on its own dime^W 10p instead, or b) not done Morello at all?