By: anonymou5 (no.delete@this.spam.com), July 1, 2022 8:09 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
dmcq (dmcq.delete@this.fano.co.uk) on July 1, 2022 6:11 am wrote:
> > Are you suggesting that Arm shouldn't have matched the UK funding and a) done Morello
> > on its own dime^W 10p instead, or b) not done Morello at all?
>
> I'm saying that 'Morello exists because Arm would be foolish not to pick up the UK
> research £££' on its own is wrong. It implies the £££ was an important goal
> for ARM rather than something that made it easier.
That's your interpretation, which you are of course entitled to, but it's not what I
tried to imply with my statement. I think that this UK funding is rather brilliant.
> > Are you suggesting that Arm shouldn't have matched the UK funding and a) done Morello
> > on its own dime^W 10p instead, or b) not done Morello at all?
>
> I'm saying that 'Morello exists because Arm would be foolish not to pick up the UK
> research £££' on its own is wrong. It implies the £££ was an important goal
> for ARM rather than something that made it easier.
That's your interpretation, which you are of course entitled to, but it's not what I
tried to imply with my statement. I think that this UK funding is rather brilliant.
