By: Etienne (etienne_lorrain.delete@this.yahoo.fr), August 4, 2022 5:15 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Adrian (a.delete@this.acm.org) on August 4, 2022 12:07 am wrote:
> and also most of the branches, which are short,
> would not need more than 16 bits. Of the frequent instructions, only the indexed loads
> and stores and the operations with immediate constants would need 32 bits.
At the library level, you may have short values but they still need to be encoded in "big" placeholder because you cannot prove the user will not use far away data.
Should user of "strchr" be able to find a byte in an array of more than 4 Gbytes?
Should a callback function be provided in the same GOT?
> and also most of the branches, which are short,
> would not need more than 16 bits. Of the frequent instructions, only the indexed loads
> and stores and the operations with immediate constants would need 32 bits.
At the library level, you may have short values but they still need to be encoded in "big" placeholder because you cannot prove the user will not use far away data.
Should user of "strchr" be able to find a byte in an array of more than 4 Gbytes?
Should a callback function be provided in the same GOT?
