By: Anon (no.delete@this.spam.com), August 24, 2022 8:50 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Andrey (andrey.semashev.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 24, 2022 4:10 am wrote:
> With MUHTM, you already have the fine grained locking path as a fallback, so I don't see
> how the code became simpler than just the fine grained locking path without MUHTM.
I am talking about an hypotethical implementation that doesn't require a fallback path.
> With MUHTM, you already have the fine grained locking path as a fallback, so I don't see
> how the code became simpler than just the fine grained locking path without MUHTM.
I am talking about an hypotethical implementation that doesn't require a fallback path.