By: Rayla (rayla.delete@this.example.com), August 27, 2022 12:04 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Kara (karaardalan.delete@this.gmail.com) on August 27, 2022 11:21 am wrote:
> Rayla (rayla.delete@this.example.com) on August 27, 2022 10:35 am wrote:
> > and a memory interface far slower than those present in GPUs in a similar FLOPS range
>
> You know it's ddr5 right? 32-channel ddr5
Yes. I think I'm somewhat less impressed by 900GB/s than you are, considering it's competing with GPUs that do numbers in the multi-TB/s range and still hit bandwidth limitations. But I've also come to the conclusion that you have unconventional views on semiconductor design and that we're unlikely to agree on much.
> Rayla (rayla.delete@this.example.com) on August 27, 2022 10:35 am wrote:
> > and a memory interface far slower than those present in GPUs in a similar FLOPS range
>
> You know it's ddr5 right? 32-channel ddr5
Yes. I think I'm somewhat less impressed by 900GB/s than you are, considering it's competing with GPUs that do numbers in the multi-TB/s range and still hit bandwidth limitations. But I've also come to the conclusion that you have unconventional views on semiconductor design and that we're unlikely to agree on much.