By: anon (a.delete@this.non.com), August 31, 2022 6:50 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Wes Felter (wmf.delete@this.felter.org) on August 31, 2022 4:47 pm wrote:
> The Register adds a tidbit: "According to people familiar with the matter, Qualcomm's architectural
> license today is limited to its mobile processors, while Nuvia's applies to datacenter chips."
Odd, since Centriq was a custom implementation, thus should have required a license. Or did ARM do some shenanigans with needing new licenses for newer architecture versions? Perhaps Nuvia's is a V9.
> The Register adds a tidbit: "According to people familiar with the matter, Qualcomm's architectural
> license today is limited to its mobile processors, while Nuvia's applies to datacenter chips."
Odd, since Centriq was a custom implementation, thus should have required a license. Or did ARM do some shenanigans with needing new licenses for newer architecture versions? Perhaps Nuvia's is a V9.
