By: Anon (no.delete@this.spam.com), September 3, 2022 7:18 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
James (no.delete@this.thanks.invalid) on September 3, 2022 6:46 am wrote:
> That sounds implausible.
>
> Nuvia and Arm (and Qualcomm) were large enough to have plenty of lawyers and know what they were
> signing, and the courts are slow to interfere with (as opposed to enforce) legal agreements between
> large companies. In particular, it's difficult to allege that a term was unreasonable if Nuvia
> knew about it and willingly accepted it (they didn't have to take an Arm license).
Contract wording isn't so objective, differing interpretations happen, in this case I don't think a mediator will agree with Arm.
> That sounds implausible.
>
> Nuvia and Arm (and Qualcomm) were large enough to have plenty of lawyers and know what they were
> signing, and the courts are slow to interfere with (as opposed to enforce) legal agreements between
> large companies. In particular, it's difficult to allege that a term was unreasonable if Nuvia
> knew about it and willingly accepted it (they didn't have to take an Arm license).
Contract wording isn't so objective, differing interpretations happen, in this case I don't think a mediator will agree with Arm.
