By: Brendan (btrotter.delete@this.gmail.com), September 19, 2022 6:14 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
anonymous2 (anonymous2.delete@this.example.com) on September 18, 2022 2:40 pm wrote:
> Do OS schedulers take this into accounts for loads that have a lot of locking?
Ahaha haha ha-ha!
Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh harder!
HAHA haha haa hee-heee. Haha Ha!
Half the people designing schedulers today think we're using time-sharing mainframes from the 1960s and that "fair" isn't a mental illness; and the other half still haven't realized that CPUs have caches.
- Brendan
> Do OS schedulers take this into accounts for loads that have a lot of locking?
Ahaha haha ha-ha!
Oh wait, you're serious. Let me laugh harder!
HAHA haha haa hee-heee. Haha Ha!
Half the people designing schedulers today think we're using time-sharing mainframes from the 1960s and that "fair" isn't a mental illness; and the other half still haven't realized that CPUs have caches.
- Brendan
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| GH repo to measure core-core latency | anonymous2 | 2022/09/18 02:40 PM |
| GH repo to measure core-core latency | Foyle | 2022/09/19 04:08 AM |
| GH repo to measure core-core latency | Michael S | 2022/09/20 02:56 AM |
| GH repo to measure core-core latency | Brendan | 2022/09/19 06:14 AM |
| GH repo to measure core-core latency | anon2 | 2022/09/19 08:14 PM |