By: Michael S (already5chosen.delete@this.yahoo.com), December 8, 2022 2:42 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
--- (---.delete@this.redheron.com) on December 8, 2022 10:32 am wrote:
> Etienne (etienne_lorrain.delete@this.yahoo.fr) on December 8, 2022 6:20 am wrote:
>
> Look at what Apple does.
> (a) Apple does not have L3. Instead we get something like the capacity of L3 with
> the latency of L2 in the very large L2 caches. This is feasible if you cluster
> cores to share an L2, something that makes sense for other reasons as well.
> Various ARM designs have done this and this is what Intel E-cores do, isn't it?
>
It isn't.
In Alder Lake and Raptor Lake E-core modules are sharing L3 cache with P-cores.
ARM:
AWS Graviton2 has decent L3 cache, but Graviton3's is twice bigger.
Ampere Altra Max has rather small SLC. Probably too small to be considered L3 cache.
As to high end Qualcomm/Microsoft, I would like to know myself. So far I was not able to find any info.
> Etienne (etienne_lorrain.delete@this.yahoo.fr) on December 8, 2022 6:20 am wrote:
>
> Look at what Apple does.
> (a) Apple does not have L3. Instead we get something like the capacity of L3 with
> the latency of L2 in the very large L2 caches. This is feasible if you cluster
> cores to share an L2, something that makes sense for other reasons as well.
> Various ARM designs have done this and this is what Intel E-cores do, isn't it?
>
It isn't.
In Alder Lake and Raptor Lake E-core modules are sharing L3 cache with P-cores.
ARM:
AWS Graviton2 has decent L3 cache, but Graviton3's is twice bigger.
Ampere Altra Max has rather small SLC. Probably too small to be considered L3 cache.
As to high end Qualcomm/Microsoft, I would like to know myself. So far I was not able to find any info.