AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nm

Article: Coverage of IEDM 2003: Day 1
By: mas (mas769.delete@this.hotmail.com), December 11, 2003 8:15 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
mas (mas769@hotmail.com) on 12/11/03 wrote:
---------------------------
>David Wang (dwang@realworldtech.com) on 12/10/03 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>mas (mas769@hotmail.com) on 12/10/03 wrote:
>>---------------------------
>>>"
>>>AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nm SOI process was due to the integration
>>>of Low-K materials into the process rather than SOI.
>>>"
>>>
>>>Now that is the killer line that will get you hits and looky sees all around the Web, lol.
>>
>
>http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=19584598
>
>told you. :-). In fact I think yours was a Web exclusive.
>
>>AMD also talked about a few things like how they gradually modified the gate structure
>>for SOI until it finally achieved the performance they were expecting. Apparently
>>the transplanted gate structure performed rather sub-optimally.
>>
>>AMD had some nice slides, and I've asked to see if I can get them to include with
>>the article. However, the presenter won't be back in Germany until after the 19th.
>>I'll either have to wait and see if he'll send the slides or just write it up without the slides.
>>
>>According to the presenter, AMD was seeing quite a bit of defects from the edges
>>of wafers, since the adhesion of the metal stack was sub-optimal. They were in fact
>>flaking off, and causing more problems toward the center of the wafer.
>>

Forgot to ask how they cured their yield problems in the end and also sounds like the problems IBM have been having too with Low-K.

Also did they mention when they were having the problem and when it was fixed ?

>
>Fascinating. It just shows that these guys are almost like explorers going into
>unchartered territory where you never know what is lurking round the corner. You
>and Paul have produced a fine body of work here, don't get disheartened, we all
>read it and appreciate it even if we are not always vocal about it. :-)
>
>
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Kanter2003/12/09 03:31 AM
  Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Wang2003/12/09 05:59 PM
    Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDean Kent2003/12/09 06:08 PM
      Opteron pummels Itanium...Dean Kent2003/12/09 06:24 PM
        Har (NT)David Wang2003/12/09 06:30 PM
        AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nmmas2003/12/10 02:22 AM
          AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nmDavid Wang2003/12/10 04:31 PM
            AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nmmas2003/12/11 07:59 AM
              AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nmmas2003/12/11 08:15 AM
                AMD discloses that its yield problem on the 130nmDavid Wang2003/12/11 11:34 AM
      Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Wang2003/12/09 06:28 PM
        Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDean Kent2003/12/09 06:39 PM
        Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineMichael Menietti2003/12/10 11:22 AM
        We Care !! (honestly) (NT)GiGNiC2003/12/14 11:01 AM
    Posted a link on sci.engr.semiconductorsDean Kent2003/12/09 06:48 PM
      Posted a link on sci.engr.semiconductorsDavid Wang2003/12/09 06:51 PM
        Posted a link on sci.engr.semiconductorsDavid Kanter2003/12/09 07:32 PM
    Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineFR2003/12/10 01:26 AM
    Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineSingh, S.R.2003/12/10 01:54 AM
      Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineMarc M.2003/12/10 09:50 AM
        Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Kanter2003/12/10 11:31 PM
      Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Wang2003/12/10 04:06 PM
    Report from IEDM 2003 Onlinemas2003/12/10 02:27 AM
    Good god.. we, should I say...Marc M.2003/12/10 09:44 AM
    Report from IEDM 2003 Onlinetecate2003/12/10 03:58 PM
  Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Kanter2003/12/09 07:50 PM
    Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Wang2003/12/09 08:00 PM
      Report from IEDM 2003 OnlineDavid Kanter2003/12/09 08:42 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?