Article: Sizing up the Super Heavyweights
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), October 11, 2004 4:43 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Paul DeMone has just finished his latest edition of Silicon Insider. This article, Sizing up the Super Heavyweights is an in-depth discussion of the future high-end server MPUs: IBM's POWER5/5+ and Intel's 90nm Itanium, code-named Montecito.
This analysis touches on the many design choices relating to IBM's and Intel's implementation of CMP, SMT and memory hierarchies, just to name a few.
Enjoy,
David Kanter
This analysis touches on the many design choices relating to IBM's and Intel's implementation of CMP, SMT and memory hierarchies, just to name a few.
Enjoy,
David Kanter
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| New Silicon Insider Article | David Kanter | 2004/10/11 04:43 AM |
| Good read. Thanks again Paul. (NT) | Michael Menietti | 2004/10/11 05:36 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Singh, S.R. | 2004/10/11 05:44 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/11 05:55 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | tecate | 2004/10/11 08:52 AM |
| core size: x86 vs IPF | anonymous | 2004/10/11 10:43 AM |
| Good Question. (NT) | Chuck | 2004/10/12 07:22 AM |
| core size: x86 vs IPF | Michael S | 2004/10/12 09:53 AM |
| K8 core size 52mm^2 | IlleglWpns | 2004/10/12 11:15 AM |
| core size: x86 vs IPF | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/12 12:10 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | JS | 2004/10/13 01:42 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | mas | 2004/10/16 08:07 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Anonymous4 | 2004/10/16 09:39 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/17 05:58 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Arun Ramakrishnan | 2004/10/22 07:48 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/22 09:38 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | David Kanter | 2004/10/22 10:04 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/23 05:02 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Arun Ramakrishnan | 2004/10/23 12:47 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Michael S | 2004/10/23 10:38 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/23 12:10 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Michael S | 2004/10/23 12:40 PM |
| Do I see a flaw here? | IntelUser2000 | 2004/10/27 04:43 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/27 05:05 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | IntelUser | 2004/10/27 05:28 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/27 06:49 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | IntelUser2000 | 2004/10/27 07:45 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/01 09:13 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | anonymous | 2004/11/02 08:46 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Chuck | 2004/11/02 09:33 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Singh, S.R. | 2004/11/02 11:21 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | José Javier Zarate | 2004/11/02 02:14 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Singh, S.R. | 2004/11/02 06:47 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | anonymous | 2004/11/03 02:04 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | anonymous | 2004/11/03 02:07 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/04 10:30 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/04 08:38 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | David Kanter | 2004/11/05 07:44 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/08 07:23 PM |