Article: Sizing up the Super Heavyweights
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), October 11, 2004 5:43 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Paul DeMone has just finished his latest edition of Silicon Insider. This article, Sizing up the Super Heavyweights is an in-depth discussion of the future high-end server MPUs: IBM's POWER5/5+ and Intel's 90nm Itanium, code-named Montecito.
This analysis touches on the many design choices relating to IBM's and Intel's implementation of CMP, SMT and memory hierarchies, just to name a few.
Enjoy,
David Kanter
This analysis touches on the many design choices relating to IBM's and Intel's implementation of CMP, SMT and memory hierarchies, just to name a few.
Enjoy,
David Kanter
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| New Silicon Insider Article | David Kanter | 2004/10/11 05:43 AM |
| Good read. Thanks again Paul. (NT) | Michael Menietti | 2004/10/11 06:36 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Singh, S.R. | 2004/10/11 06:44 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/11 06:55 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | tecate | 2004/10/11 09:52 AM |
| core size: x86 vs IPF | anonymous | 2004/10/11 11:43 AM |
| Good Question. (NT) | Chuck | 2004/10/12 08:22 AM |
| core size: x86 vs IPF | Michael S | 2004/10/12 10:53 AM |
| K8 core size 52mm^2 | IlleglWpns | 2004/10/12 12:15 PM |
| core size: x86 vs IPF | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/12 01:10 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | JS | 2004/10/13 02:42 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | mas | 2004/10/16 09:07 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Anonymous4 | 2004/10/16 10:39 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/17 06:58 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Arun Ramakrishnan | 2004/10/22 08:48 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/22 10:38 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | David Kanter | 2004/10/22 11:04 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/23 06:02 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Arun Ramakrishnan | 2004/10/23 01:47 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Michael S | 2004/10/23 11:38 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/23 01:10 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Michael S | 2004/10/23 01:40 PM |
| Do I see a flaw here? | IntelUser2000 | 2004/10/27 05:43 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/27 06:05 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | IntelUser | 2004/10/27 06:28 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | Paul DeMone | 2004/10/27 07:49 PM |
| Frequency is different for starters | IntelUser2000 | 2004/10/27 08:45 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/01 10:13 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | anonymous | 2004/11/02 09:46 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Chuck | 2004/11/02 10:33 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Singh, S.R. | 2004/11/02 12:21 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | José Javier Zarate | 2004/11/02 03:14 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | Singh, S.R. | 2004/11/02 07:47 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | anonymous | 2004/11/03 03:04 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | anonymous | 2004/11/03 03:07 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/04 11:30 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/04 09:38 PM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | David Kanter | 2004/11/05 08:44 AM |
| New Silicon Insider Article | IntelUser2000 | 2004/11/08 08:23 PM |
