New Silicon Insider Article

Article: Sizing up the Super Heavyweights
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), October 22, 2004 11:04 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Paul DeMone (pdemone@igs.net) on 10/22/04 wrote:
---------------------------
>Arun Ramakrishnan (arunr@sgi.com) on 10/22/04 wrote:
>---------------------------
>[..]
>>Why would the L2 I-cache be about 4 times the size of the L2 D-cache ?
>>I always thought that MPU desginers would try to cut the latency of access to user
>>data much more than the intruction stream itself.

Well, if you think about it, a large Icache is far more important. An ICache miss means that you are wasting many cycles, no matter how the data cache performs. In contrast, if the data cache performs poorly, then a context switch producing hits in the ICache could still provide useful work.

>IA-64 has low code density. A 1.0 MB/256KB IPF design
>has similar instruction/data balance as roughly a 512
>KB/256 KB RISC design. A bigger L2 icache also reduces
>average instruction stream bandwidth demand on the L3.

Actually, I was thinking along different lines. Andy Glew and I talked about this briefly, but there was a paper out of UW-Madison that indicated that the 'working set' for a database is ~1MB for ICache. I do not know which architecture this was, but I suspect it was Alpha or x86...

Unfortunately, I do not recall the author of the paper, but it was quite interesting.

>>Would this have something to do with the fact that two coarse grained threads on
>>the core need to fed rapidly in order to keep the CMP efficiency high ?
>
>Yep, that's probably the biggest reason. I also suspect
>it will give a noticable boost to IA-32 EL performance.

Why do you think it will give a particular boost to IA32EL? I am curious here. My initial thought was that they wanted to provide higher database performance.

David
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/10/11 05:43 AM
  Good read. Thanks again Paul. (NT)Michael Menietti2004/10/11 06:36 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/10/11 06:44 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/11 06:55 AM
  New Silicon Insider Articletecate2004/10/11 09:52 AM
  core size: x86 vs IPFanonymous2004/10/11 11:43 AM
    Good Question. (NT)Chuck2004/10/12 08:22 AM
    core size: x86 vs IPFMichael S2004/10/12 10:53 AM
    K8 core size 52mm^2IlleglWpns2004/10/12 12:15 PM
    core size: x86 vs IPFPaul DeMone2004/10/12 01:10 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleJS2004/10/13 02:42 AM
  New Silicon Insider Articlemas2004/10/16 09:07 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleAnonymous42004/10/16 10:39 PM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/17 06:58 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleArun Ramakrishnan2004/10/22 08:48 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/22 10:38 AM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/10/22 11:04 PM
        New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/23 06:02 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleArun Ramakrishnan2004/10/23 01:47 PM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleMichael S2004/10/23 11:38 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/23 01:10 PM
          New Silicon Insider ArticleMichael S2004/10/23 01:40 PM
  Do I see a flaw here?IntelUser20002004/10/27 05:43 PM
    Frequency is different for startersPaul DeMone2004/10/27 06:05 PM
      Frequency is different for startersIntelUser2004/10/27 06:28 PM
        Frequency is different for startersPaul DeMone2004/10/27 07:49 PM
          Frequency is different for startersIntelUser20002004/10/27 08:45 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/01 10:13 AM
    New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/02 09:46 AM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleChuck2004/11/02 10:33 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/11/02 12:21 PM
          New Silicon Insider ArticleJosé Javier Zarate2004/11/02 03:14 PM
            New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/11/02 07:47 PM
        New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/03 03:04 PM
          New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/03 03:07 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/04 11:30 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/04 09:38 PM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/11/05 08:44 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/08 08:23 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell purple?