Do I see a flaw here?

Article: Sizing up the Super Heavyweights
By: IntelUser2000 (Intel_user2000.delete@this.yahoo.ca), October 27, 2004 5:43 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 10/11/04 wrote:
---------------------------
>Paul DeMone has just finished his latest edition of Silicon Insider. This article, Sizing up the Super Heavyweights
>is an in-depth discussion of the future high-end server MPUs: IBM's POWER5/5+ and
>Intel's 90nm Itanium, code-named Montecito.
>
>This analysis touches on the many design choices relating to IBM's and Intel's
>implementation of CMP, SMT and memory hierarchies, just to name a few.
>
>Enjoy,
>
>David Kanter

Do I see an error you made Paul? Why does your older article on future chips(Link: target="_blank">http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT042704221446) state that Montecito gets
SPECint_base_rate2k: 62
SPECfp_base_rate2k: 87

with this quote: "The effects of improvements in compiler technology or platform support (chipset, FSB speed, memory etc.) over the next 12 to 18 months were not included in the performance estimates."

While your new article says(Link:http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT100404214638):
SPECint_rate_base2k, 4P: 96
SPECfp_rate_base2k, 4P: 120

Do you mean that now your estimation of spec-rate performance is off since you estimated back then SPECint_base_rate2k: 62,

and now you say

SPECint_rate_base2k, 4P: 96

So which one is right? Will Montecito legacy perform at SPECint_rate_base2k: 96 at single processor, or 96 at 4 processor?


Oh yeah and another question: I heard Maximum power dissipation of Madison 6M was 130W, and its TDP: 107W, and I also heard that Montecito will have 100W power dissipation rather than 130W of the previous generation Itaniums so does it mean that Montecito will have 100W max power dissipation or 100W TDP?




< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/10/11 05:43 AM
  Good read. Thanks again Paul. (NT)Michael Menietti2004/10/11 06:36 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/10/11 06:44 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/11 06:55 AM
  New Silicon Insider Articletecate2004/10/11 09:52 AM
  core size: x86 vs IPFanonymous2004/10/11 11:43 AM
    Good Question. (NT)Chuck2004/10/12 08:22 AM
    core size: x86 vs IPFMichael S2004/10/12 10:53 AM
    K8 core size 52mm^2IlleglWpns2004/10/12 12:15 PM
    core size: x86 vs IPFPaul DeMone2004/10/12 01:10 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleJS2004/10/13 02:42 AM
  New Silicon Insider Articlemas2004/10/16 09:07 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleAnonymous42004/10/16 10:39 PM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/17 06:58 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleArun Ramakrishnan2004/10/22 08:48 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/22 10:38 AM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/10/22 11:04 PM
        New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/23 06:02 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleArun Ramakrishnan2004/10/23 01:47 PM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleMichael S2004/10/23 11:38 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/23 01:10 PM
          New Silicon Insider ArticleMichael S2004/10/23 01:40 PM
  Do I see a flaw here?IntelUser20002004/10/27 05:43 PM
    Frequency is different for startersPaul DeMone2004/10/27 06:05 PM
      Frequency is different for startersIntelUser2004/10/27 06:28 PM
        Frequency is different for startersPaul DeMone2004/10/27 07:49 PM
          Frequency is different for startersIntelUser20002004/10/27 08:45 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/01 10:13 AM
    New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/02 09:46 AM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleChuck2004/11/02 10:33 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/11/02 12:21 PM
          New Silicon Insider ArticleJosé Javier Zarate2004/11/02 03:14 PM
            New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/11/02 07:47 PM
        New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/03 03:04 PM
          New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/03 03:07 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/04 11:30 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/04 09:38 PM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/11/05 08:44 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/08 08:23 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell purple?