New Silicon Insider Article

Article: Sizing up the Super Heavyweights
By: Chuck (no.delete@this.thanks.com), November 2, 2004 9:33 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
anonymous (none@here.info) on 11/2/04 wrote:
---------------------------
>>[...] I can't see how Montecito can compete with any of
>>AMD's products at all. Sure the performance is higher,
>>but is it worth it when you can get 2-3 Opteron systems
>>with one Montecito system?
>
>RAS? (At least that's what some people keep bringing up.)
>
>Lets see.
>
>Opteron does have plenty of ECC, parity, and machine-check
>features. It might still be trailing IPF on this front, but
>this can be addressed in the future, if need be.
>
>In terms of maturity, AMD64 is as good or bad as IPF. Both
>are fairly new; AMD64 benefits from "being like x86", while
>IPF benefits from Intel's massive resources. (Reading the
>errata lists for the two is interesting. :)
>
>And when it comes to scalability -- well, there is Horus.
>
>I'm curious to see what AMD will be able to do with FAB36.
>
>>I don't call Montecito's performance increase over Madison 6MB impressive at all.
>>It rather sucks. Call me a troll or whatever, but without achieving dual-core
>>and such Mckinley achieved similar performance increase over Merced, plus you didn't need to have ridiculous size die.
>
>I concur.
>
>Though IPF die sizes have always been ridiculous.
>
>Here are the numbers that I've gathered over time:
>
>180nm Merced = 441 mm^2 (without L3)

How did you get Merced's die size figure? IIRC Intel never disclosed its die size.

>180nm McKinley = 421 mm^2 (3M L3)
>130nm Madison = 374 mm^2 (6M L3)
>130nm Madison = 266 mm^2 (1.5M L3 aka Deerfield)
>???nm Madison = ??? mm^2 (9M L3)
>90nm Montecito = 580 mm^2 (2x 12M L3)
>
>But hey, sadly that's the way things seem to be heading: the
>processor cores are being relegated to memory controllers.
>On that front IPF is merely a sign of things to come, thanks
>to Intel's immense fab capacity.
>
>In fact, with ever-shrinking core die sizes, Intel & co have
>to go multi-core and large-cache -- otherwise they have too
>much fab space. A sad trend, IMO.
>
>>With Athlon64's having almost as low TDP as Pentium M at half the price and faster
>>performance, I can't see how Intel will keep their marketshare advantage over AMD,
>>whether desktop, palmtop, server, laptop, only reason that Intel lives is because of the stupid customers.
>
>It's called a brand. :)
>
>But yeah, a brand alone won't save you forever.
>
>Btw, Dothan is a kick-a$$ part.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/10/11 04:43 AM
  Good read. Thanks again Paul. (NT)Michael Menietti2004/10/11 05:36 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/10/11 05:44 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/11 05:55 AM
  New Silicon Insider Articletecate2004/10/11 08:52 AM
  core size: x86 vs IPFanonymous2004/10/11 10:43 AM
    Good Question. (NT)Chuck2004/10/12 07:22 AM
    core size: x86 vs IPFMichael S2004/10/12 09:53 AM
    K8 core size 52mm^2IlleglWpns2004/10/12 11:15 AM
    core size: x86 vs IPFPaul DeMone2004/10/12 12:10 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleJS2004/10/13 01:42 AM
  New Silicon Insider Articlemas2004/10/16 08:07 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleAnonymous42004/10/16 09:39 PM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/17 05:58 AM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleArun Ramakrishnan2004/10/22 07:48 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/22 09:38 AM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/10/22 10:04 PM
        New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/23 05:02 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleArun Ramakrishnan2004/10/23 12:47 PM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleMichael S2004/10/23 10:38 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticlePaul DeMone2004/10/23 12:10 PM
          New Silicon Insider ArticleMichael S2004/10/23 12:40 PM
  Do I see a flaw here?IntelUser20002004/10/27 04:43 PM
    Frequency is different for startersPaul DeMone2004/10/27 05:05 PM
      Frequency is different for startersIntelUser2004/10/27 05:28 PM
        Frequency is different for startersPaul DeMone2004/10/27 06:49 PM
          Frequency is different for startersIntelUser20002004/10/27 07:45 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/01 09:13 AM
    New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/02 08:46 AM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleChuck2004/11/02 09:33 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/11/02 11:21 AM
          New Silicon Insider ArticleJosé Javier Zarate2004/11/02 02:14 PM
            New Silicon Insider ArticleSingh, S.R.2004/11/02 06:47 PM
        New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/03 02:04 PM
          New Silicon Insider Articleanonymous2004/11/03 02:07 PM
  New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/04 10:30 AM
    New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/04 08:38 PM
      New Silicon Insider ArticleDavid Kanter2004/11/05 07:44 AM
        New Silicon Insider ArticleIntelUser20002004/11/08 07:23 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell purple?