New CELL Article Online

Article: CELL Microprocessor III
By: mas ((Not Given)), August 2, 2005 11:53 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
mas () on 8/2/05 wrote:
---------------------------
>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 8/2/05 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>David Wang has finished up a third article on the CELL microprocessor at Real World
>>Technologies. The third article examines some recent revisions to the CELL processor
>>and theorizes on the cause of these changes, inconsistencies in the claimed computational
>>power of the PS3, the CELL programming model and the power characteristics of CELL.
>>
>>The address for the article is:
>>
>>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT072405191325
>>

>>
>>Kudos to David for this great read.
>>
>>
>>Enjoy,
>>
>>
>>David Kanter
>
>Yes, another fine job. So with 7 SPEs we can say for every cycle the SPEs provide
>2 DP FMADD and the PPE 1 DP FMADD giving 6 DP flops/cycle. 3.2 Ghz gives 19.2 peak
>DP GFlops which means for reference that I2/P5 could match this peak at 4.8 Ghz
>although how much a Cell could sustain in practice is not certain. Coincidentally
>by having 3 PPEs the Xenon in Xbox 360 could match that DP figure with its SP rate
>being 76.8 Gflops vs Cell's 204.8 so it doesn't look so outclassed as one would
>think given Cell's hype. I have also heard development Cell kits are only at 2.4
>Ghz. Anyway they both sound like great distributed computing clients I hope Sony
>and Microsoft allow them to be used in that ancillary fashion.
>

Actually considering I2/P5 will be/are dual-core they only need 2.4 Ghz per chip and x86 4.8 Ghz per dual-core chip which they are all knocking on.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
New CELL Article OnlineDavid Kanter2005/08/02 10:32 AM
  New CELL Article Onlinemas2005/08/02 11:46 AM
    New CELL Article Onlinemas2005/08/02 11:53 AM
    New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/02 12:46 PM
      New CELL Article Onlinefastpathguru2005/08/02 03:05 PM
        New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/02 05:27 PM
          New CELL Article OnlinePanajev2001a2005/08/03 02:26 AM
            New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/03 10:28 AM
              New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/04 12:05 PM
                New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/04 04:47 PM
                  New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/04 06:04 PM
                    New CELL Article Onlinejohn evans2005/08/04 07:30 PM
                      New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/05 11:10 AM
                        New CELL Article OnlineLinus Torvalds2005/08/05 05:21 PM
                          New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/05 06:33 PM
                            New CELL Article Onlinefastpathguru2005/08/05 09:36 PM
                              New CELL Article Onlinejohn evans2005/08/05 09:51 PM
                              New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/06 03:09 AM
                                New CELL Article Onlinefastpathguru2005/08/06 05:29 AM
                                  New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/07 03:06 PM
                    New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/04 08:03 PM
                      New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/05 11:21 AM
                        New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/05 10:51 PM
              New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/05 11:00 PM
                New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/07 02:39 PM
                  New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/08 12:57 PM
                    New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/08 01:55 PM
                      New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/08 02:37 PM
                        New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/08 04:05 PM
                          New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/08 04:47 PM
                            New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/08 05:25 PM
                              Implausible at best, irrational most likely...David Kanter2005/08/08 05:51 PM
                                Implausible at best, irrational most likely...Deadmeat2005/08/09 09:26 AM
                              New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/08 06:46 PM
                                New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/09 09:36 AM
                                  New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/09 10:12 AM
                                    New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/09 12:26 PM
                                      New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/09 01:36 PM
                                New CELL Article OnlineAaron Spink2005/08/09 01:57 PM
                                  New CELL Article OnlineDavid Wang2005/08/10 09:06 AM
                    New CELL Article OnlineSerge Monkewitz2005/08/09 12:18 PM
                      New CELL Article OnlineDeadmeat2005/08/09 12:30 PM
                        New CELL Article OnlineVitaly Vidmirov2005/08/11 12:36 AM
      New CELL Article OnlineAnonymous2005/08/03 03:11 PM
        New CELL Article Onlinefastpathguru2005/08/03 04:19 PM
          New CELL Article Onlinemas2005/08/03 06:59 PM
            New CELL Article OnlineJosé Javier Zarate2005/08/04 04:20 AM
              New CELL Article Onlinemas2005/08/04 04:27 AM
          New CELL Article Onlinemas2005/08/05 05:50 AM
  New CELL Article OnlinePiedPiper2005/08/02 08:02 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell purple?