By: William Campbell (wcampbell.delete@this.realworldtech.com), November 29, 2005 12:48 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Dean Kent (dkent@realworldtech.com) on 11/29/05 wrote:
---------------------------
>Temp (Armand.Hirt@caramail.com) on 11/29/05 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>... Or were you free to choose any benchmark?
>
>I wonder why nobody ever asks this question when AMD systems are reviewed?
>
>Regards,
>Dean
I have, though not here. When was the last time RWT reviewed AMD?
As you did not answer Armand's question, I will ask:
Will you publish _both_ AMD's and Intel's benchmark recommendations that ship with review systems?" The latest you have will be fine. ;)
If you will not, for what reason(s) will you not?
If you cannot publish the recommended benchmarks, in the latest review of an AMD supplied system, and an Intel supplied system, can you identify the benchmarks that RWT specifically chose?
I have asked this (these) question(s) numerous times on forums such as Tech Report and AnandTech with no response.
>
>>
>>- Armand
>>
>
---------------------------
>Temp (Armand.Hirt@caramail.com) on 11/29/05 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>... Or were you free to choose any benchmark?
>
>I wonder why nobody ever asks this question when AMD systems are reviewed?
>
>Regards,
>Dean
I have, though not here. When was the last time RWT reviewed AMD?
As you did not answer Armand's question, I will ask:
Will you publish _both_ AMD's and Intel's benchmark recommendations that ship with review systems?" The latest you have will be fine. ;)
If you will not, for what reason(s) will you not?
If you cannot publish the recommended benchmarks, in the latest review of an AMD supplied system, and an Intel supplied system, can you identify the benchmarks that RWT specifically chose?
I have asked this (these) question(s) numerous times on forums such as Tech Report and AnandTech with no response.
>
>>
>>- Armand
>>
>
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 01:45 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Temp | 2005/11/29 06:25 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 11:55 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Temp | 2005/11/29 02:29 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | rwessel | 2005/11/29 02:53 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 12:01 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 12:48 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 01:37 PM |
| Well said! (NT) | savantu | 2005/11/29 01:44 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 04:12 PM |
| To clarify intent | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 04:19 PM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 04:21 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 06:13 PM |
| Peer review | nick | 2005/11/29 11:09 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 12:39 AM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 01:21 AM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 11:25 PM |
| Yes please (NT) | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 12:28 AM |
| Yes please (NT) | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 06:19 PM |
| Thank you | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 08:51 PM |
| Thank you | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 10:29 PM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 07:12 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 07:50 PM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/11/30 05:16 AM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 08:49 PM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/01 03:02 AM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/12/01 04:54 AM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/01 05:11 AM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/01 03:03 AM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/12/01 07:55 AM |
| Peer review | Bill Todd | 2005/12/01 08:26 PM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/12/01 09:52 PM |
| Peer review | Bill Todd | 2005/12/01 10:14 PM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/12/01 11:04 PM |
| Peer review | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 12:13 AM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 07:02 AM |
| You lost this one. | Ray | 2005/12/02 11:54 AM |
| You lost. | tecate | 2005/12/02 02:55 PM |
| I second that (NT) | savantu | 2005/12/02 03:22 PM |
| I wasn't in the game. | Ray | 2005/12/02 04:19 PM |
| I wasn't in the game. | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 10:20 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 05:28 PM |
| You lost. | Anonymous | 2005/12/02 08:27 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 08:56 PM |
| You lost. | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 10:37 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 12:08 AM |
| All about the context | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 02:27 PM |
| All about the context | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 02:51 PM |
| All about the context | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 04:29 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/02 09:15 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 10:00 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/02 11:09 PM |
| You lost. | anonymous | 2005/12/03 02:42 AM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 02:45 PM |
| Well... | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 03:51 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/03 05:54 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | NIKOLAS | 2005/12/03 06:25 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 09:40 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 09:48 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 09:48 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 11:17 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | David Kanter | 2005/12/04 12:37 AM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 01:19 AM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 09:43 AM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | tecate | 2005/12/04 01:17 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | mas | 2005/12/04 02:02 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | tecate | 2005/12/05 06:21 AM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | tecate | 2005/12/04 01:18 PM |
| ... | Temp | 2005/12/04 03:38 PM |
| ... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 05:25 PM |
| Once more, alas | Temp | 2005/12/05 02:23 AM |
| Once more, alas | Dean Kent | 2005/12/05 08:23 AM |
| Bye | Temp | 2005/12/05 10:47 AM |
| Once more, alas | Bill Todd | 2005/12/05 10:58 AM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | Temp | 2005/12/05 03:42 AM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | Dean Kent | 2005/12/05 10:06 AM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | David Kanter | 2005/12/05 08:08 PM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | Temp | 2005/12/06 01:45 AM |
| More info about Sungard | Temp | 2005/12/06 03:20 PM |
| More info about Sungard | David Kanter | 2005/12/06 04:25 PM |
| More info about Sungard | Temp | 2005/12/07 12:40 AM |
| More info about Sungard | Dean Kent | 2005/12/07 07:52 AM |
| More info about Sungard | Dean Kent | 2005/12/06 07:22 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 09:31 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 09:51 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 11:14 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/04 01:06 AM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 01:54 AM |
| Enough with the politics... (NT) | David Kanter | 2005/12/04 03:41 AM |
| You lost. | anonymous | 2005/12/04 04:03 AM |
| Well Said! (NT) | Anonymous | 2005/12/04 04:48 AM |
| You lost. | savantu | 2005/12/04 06:47 AM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 09:39 PM |
| You lost. | anonymous | 2005/12/05 02:51 AM |
| You lost this one. | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 09:41 PM |
| You lost this one. | Leonov | 2005/12/03 12:55 AM |
| You lost this one. | tecate | 2005/12/03 05:27 AM |
| You lost this one. | Leonov | 2005/12/03 06:33 AM |
| You lost this one. | savantu | 2005/12/03 10:19 AM |
| You lost this one. | Leonov | 2005/12/03 12:19 PM |
| For god sake. | Anonymous | 2005/12/04 04:28 AM |
| It's sad | sav | 2005/12/04 06:43 AM |
| It's sad | mas | 2005/12/04 07:09 AM |
| It's sad | Michael S | 2005/12/04 07:33 AM |
| Perfect | No one you'd know | 2005/12/04 10:52 AM |
| Perfect | mas | 2005/12/04 12:32 PM |
| Perfect | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 12:50 PM |
| Perfect | mas | 2005/12/04 01:16 PM |
| Perfect | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 04:22 PM |
| Posts deleted, topic not open for discussion | David Kanter | 2005/12/05 02:05 PM |
| Posts deleted, topic not open for discussion | Keith Fiske | 2005/12/05 05:03 PM |
| This will not be tolerated | David Kanter | 2005/12/04 04:32 PM |
| For god sake. | Leonov | 2005/12/05 07:10 AM |
| Back on track... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/05 12:35 PM |
| Back on track... | Leonov | 2005/12/06 03:08 AM |
| You lost this one. | Temp | 2005/12/03 04:16 AM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 06:22 AM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/02 12:01 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | an | 2005/11/29 01:17 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 02:17 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | an | 2005/11/30 07:52 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 10:42 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 04:11 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | anonymous | 2005/11/29 05:38 PM |
| It's called | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 06:17 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Temp | 2005/11/29 02:41 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 03:02 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 07:41 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/29 02:03 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | Daniel Bizó | 2005/11/29 03:27 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/30 07:40 AM |
| 2 small nitpicks | Daniel Bizó | 2005/11/30 11:17 AM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/30 12:30 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 02:32 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/30 02:49 PM |
| Minor Comment about CineBench | Rakesh Malik | 2005/11/29 02:22 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | PiedPiper | 2005/11/29 08:04 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | PiedPiper | 2005/11/29 08:08 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 02:05 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | PiedPiper | 2005/11/30 07:58 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/12/01 01:45 AM |
| Why no 64-bit tests? | PiedPiper | 2005/11/29 08:37 PM |
| Why no 64-bit tests? | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 02:07 AM |
