Dean Kent (dkent@realworldtech.com) on 12/5/05 wrote:

...

you can continue to form your questions the same way, and I will continue
>to ask why they are formed that way, or why they are of any relevance.

Had you actually *done* that - merely asked Armand to clarify his intent in the neutral manner which you suggest you would take above (you could take a lesson here from the way he phrased his own questions) - this tempest in a teapot would never have taken place.

But of course you did nothing of the kind: instead of asking any kind of question at all, you directly asserted that Armand's material contained 'sinister' implications, based solely upon your personal inferences which you later seemed to be stating arose largely from *other* observations about Armand which I'd have to visit myself to see whether they were as much complete fabrications as your alleged observations here were.

Until you can recognize the vast difference between the way you conducted yourself here and the way Armand did, it seems clear that nothing resembling closure of this matter will occur. Under those circumstances, if you prefer that this forum not be subject to this kind of digression, you should probably stop continuing to fuel it.

- bill