Ray (a@b.c) on 12/2/05 wrote:
---------------------------
>
>I don't buy your argument. You are using logic for support rather than enlightenment.
>You are still imputing unmade statements to third parties.
>

Bullshit. Armand as much as admitted that his intent was to determine whether Intel had attempted to influence the review either by providing the benchmarks, or requiring that certain ones be used. Seems to me that the reading comprehension problem exists for some who constantly berate others for it.

Looks like Armand's Jedi tricks work on the weak minded. :-).

Regards,
Dean