By: an (an.delete@this.yahoo.com), November 29, 2005 2:03 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
1. Page 4 ends with "At eight threads, the Bensley system executed the kernel 74% faster." Faster than what? Than with 4 threads? Than Nocona? It took a little number crunching to figure out you meant than 1 thread on the Bensley.
2. Page 4 ends with "The Bensley system at eight threads is 88% faster than the Nocona." Again it was a bit confusing, as Nocona was not benchmarked with 8 threads, nor was Bensley 88% faster than Nocona at the last data point, 4 threads. Seems useless to compare directly 8 threaded Bensley to 1 threaded Nocona.
2. Page 4 ends with "The Bensley system at eight threads is 88% faster than the Nocona." Again it was a bit confusing, as Nocona was not benchmarked with 8 threads, nor was Bensley 88% faster than Nocona at the last data point, 4 threads. Seems useless to compare directly 8 threaded Bensley to 1 threaded Nocona.
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 01:45 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Temp | 2005/11/29 06:25 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 11:55 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Temp | 2005/11/29 02:29 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | rwessel | 2005/11/29 02:53 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 12:01 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 12:48 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 01:37 PM |
| Well said! (NT) | savantu | 2005/11/29 01:44 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 04:12 PM |
| To clarify intent | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 04:19 PM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 04:21 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 06:13 PM |
| Peer review | nick | 2005/11/29 11:09 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 12:39 AM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 01:21 AM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 11:25 PM |
| Yes please (NT) | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 12:28 AM |
| Yes please (NT) | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 06:19 PM |
| Thank you | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 08:51 PM |
| Thank you | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 10:29 PM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 07:12 PM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 07:50 PM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/11/30 05:16 AM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/11/30 08:49 PM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/01 03:02 AM |
| Peer review | William Campbell | 2005/12/01 04:54 AM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/01 05:11 AM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/01 03:03 AM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/12/01 07:55 AM |
| Peer review | Bill Todd | 2005/12/01 08:26 PM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/12/01 09:52 PM |
| Peer review | Bill Todd | 2005/12/01 10:14 PM |
| Peer review | David Kanter | 2005/12/01 11:04 PM |
| Peer review | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 12:13 AM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 07:02 AM |
| You lost this one. | Ray | 2005/12/02 11:54 AM |
| You lost. | tecate | 2005/12/02 02:55 PM |
| I second that (NT) | savantu | 2005/12/02 03:22 PM |
| I wasn't in the game. | Ray | 2005/12/02 04:19 PM |
| I wasn't in the game. | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 10:20 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 05:28 PM |
| You lost. | Anonymous | 2005/12/02 08:27 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 08:56 PM |
| You lost. | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 10:37 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 12:08 AM |
| All about the context | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 02:27 PM |
| All about the context | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 02:51 PM |
| All about the context | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 04:29 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/02 09:15 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/02 10:00 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/02 11:09 PM |
| You lost. | anonymous | 2005/12/03 02:42 AM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 02:45 PM |
| Well... | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 03:51 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/03 05:54 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | NIKOLAS | 2005/12/03 06:25 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 09:40 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 09:48 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | David Kanter | 2005/12/03 09:48 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 11:17 PM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | David Kanter | 2005/12/04 12:37 AM |
| Bill is a self loathing American | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 01:19 AM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 09:43 AM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | tecate | 2005/12/04 01:17 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | mas | 2005/12/04 02:02 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | tecate | 2005/12/05 06:21 AM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | tecate | 2005/12/04 01:18 PM |
| ... | Temp | 2005/12/04 03:38 PM |
| ... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 05:25 PM |
| Once more, alas | Temp | 2005/12/05 02:23 AM |
| Once more, alas | Dean Kent | 2005/12/05 08:23 AM |
| Bye | Temp | 2005/12/05 10:47 AM |
| Once more, alas | Bill Todd | 2005/12/05 10:58 AM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | Temp | 2005/12/05 03:42 AM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | Dean Kent | 2005/12/05 10:06 AM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | David Kanter | 2005/12/05 08:08 PM |
| Sungard as a benchmark | Temp | 2005/12/06 01:45 AM |
| More info about Sungard | Temp | 2005/12/06 03:20 PM |
| More info about Sungard | David Kanter | 2005/12/06 04:25 PM |
| More info about Sungard | Temp | 2005/12/07 12:40 AM |
| More info about Sungard | Dean Kent | 2005/12/07 07:52 AM |
| More info about Sungard | Dean Kent | 2005/12/06 07:22 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 09:31 PM |
| This whole thread is a symptom... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 09:51 PM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/03 11:14 PM |
| You lost. | Ray | 2005/12/04 01:06 AM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 01:54 AM |
| Enough with the politics... (NT) | David Kanter | 2005/12/04 03:41 AM |
| You lost. | anonymous | 2005/12/04 04:03 AM |
| Well Said! (NT) | Anonymous | 2005/12/04 04:48 AM |
| You lost. | savantu | 2005/12/04 06:47 AM |
| You lost. | Bill Todd | 2005/12/04 09:39 PM |
| You lost. | anonymous | 2005/12/05 02:51 AM |
| You lost this one. | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 09:41 PM |
| You lost this one. | Leonov | 2005/12/03 12:55 AM |
| You lost this one. | tecate | 2005/12/03 05:27 AM |
| You lost this one. | Leonov | 2005/12/03 06:33 AM |
| You lost this one. | savantu | 2005/12/03 10:19 AM |
| You lost this one. | Leonov | 2005/12/03 12:19 PM |
| For god sake. | Anonymous | 2005/12/04 04:28 AM |
| It's sad | sav | 2005/12/04 06:43 AM |
| It's sad | mas | 2005/12/04 07:09 AM |
| It's sad | Michael S | 2005/12/04 07:33 AM |
| Perfect | No one you'd know | 2005/12/04 10:52 AM |
| Perfect | mas | 2005/12/04 12:32 PM |
| Perfect | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 12:50 PM |
| Perfect | mas | 2005/12/04 01:16 PM |
| Perfect | Dean Kent | 2005/12/04 04:22 PM |
| Posts deleted, topic not open for discussion | David Kanter | 2005/12/05 02:05 PM |
| Posts deleted, topic not open for discussion | Keith Fiske | 2005/12/05 05:03 PM |
| This will not be tolerated | David Kanter | 2005/12/04 04:32 PM |
| For god sake. | Leonov | 2005/12/05 07:10 AM |
| Back on track... | Dean Kent | 2005/12/05 12:35 PM |
| Back on track... | Leonov | 2005/12/06 03:08 AM |
| You lost this one. | Temp | 2005/12/03 04:16 AM |
| Peer review | Dean Kent | 2005/12/02 06:22 AM |
| Peer review | Temp | 2005/12/02 12:01 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | an | 2005/11/29 01:17 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 02:17 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | an | 2005/11/30 07:52 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 10:42 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 04:11 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | anonymous | 2005/11/29 05:38 PM |
| It's called | William Campbell | 2005/11/29 06:17 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Temp | 2005/11/29 02:41 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/29 03:02 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | Dean Kent | 2005/11/29 07:41 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/29 02:03 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | Daniel Bizó | 2005/11/29 03:27 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/30 07:40 AM |
| 2 small nitpicks | Daniel Bizó | 2005/11/30 11:17 AM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/30 12:30 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 02:32 PM |
| 2 small nitpicks | an | 2005/11/30 02:49 PM |
| Minor Comment about CineBench | Rakesh Malik | 2005/11/29 02:22 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | PiedPiper | 2005/11/29 08:04 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | PiedPiper | 2005/11/29 08:08 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 02:05 AM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | PiedPiper | 2005/11/30 07:58 PM |
| Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Online | David Kanter | 2005/12/01 01:45 AM |
| Why no 64-bit tests? | PiedPiper | 2005/11/29 08:37 PM |
| Why no 64-bit tests? | David Kanter | 2005/11/30 02:07 AM |
