2 small nitpicks

By: Daniel Bizó (bizo.daniel.delete@this.hwsw.hu), November 30, 2005 11:17 am
an (an@yahoo.com) on 11/30/05 wrote:
---------------------------
>500 seconds at 8 threads and Nocona has a time of 1000 seconds at 4 threads. Please
>describe the math you used to come up with Bensley being 88% faster in this situation?

Sure I will.:)

Bensley's performance in seconds/Nocona's performance in seconds

From David's numbers, it should be around 53 %, which means that it took Bensley around one half of the total time Nocona needed to accomplish the benchmark. Taking Nocona as the base of relative difference, which hopefully don't need any comments, you have to invert the raw number you've got from the Bensley/Noocona quotient -- just because we are talking about time, which is in inverse ratio to performance. When the quotient is around 0,53, surpsingly, it is 1,88 in relative perfomance, or 188%, or a 88% speedup.

TopicPosted ByDate
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/29 01:45 AM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineTemp2005/11/29 06:25 AM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/29 11:55 AM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineTemp2005/11/29 02:29 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Onlinerwessel2005/11/29 02:53 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDean Kent2005/11/29 12:01 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineWilliam Campbell2005/11/29 12:48 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/29 01:37 PM
Well said! (NT)savantu2005/11/29 01:44 PM
Peer reviewWilliam Campbell2005/11/29 04:12 PM
To clarify intentWilliam Campbell2005/11/29 04:19 PM
Peer reviewDavid Kanter2005/11/29 04:21 PM
Peer reviewWilliam Campbell2005/11/29 06:13 PM
Peer reviewnick2005/11/29 11:09 PM
Peer reviewWilliam Campbell2005/11/30 12:39 AM
Peer reviewDavid Kanter2005/11/30 01:21 AM
Peer reviewDavid Kanter2005/11/29 11:25 PM
Yes please (NT)William Campbell2005/11/30 12:28 AM
Yes please (NT)David Kanter2005/11/30 06:19 PM
Thank youWilliam Campbell2005/11/30 08:51 PM
Thank youDavid Kanter2005/11/30 10:29 PM
Peer reviewDean Kent2005/11/29 07:12 PM
Peer reviewWilliam Campbell2005/11/29 07:50 PM
Peer reviewDean Kent2005/11/30 05:16 AM
Peer reviewWilliam Campbell2005/11/30 08:49 PM
Peer reviewTemp2005/12/01 03:02 AM
Peer reviewWilliam Campbell2005/12/01 04:54 AM
Peer reviewTemp2005/12/01 05:11 AM
Peer reviewTemp2005/12/01 03:03 AM
Peer reviewDean Kent2005/12/01 07:55 AM
Peer reviewBill Todd2005/12/01 08:26 PM
Peer reviewDavid Kanter2005/12/01 09:52 PM
Peer reviewBill Todd2005/12/01 10:14 PM
Peer reviewDavid Kanter2005/12/01 11:04 PM
Peer reviewBill Todd2005/12/02 12:13 AM
Peer reviewDean Kent2005/12/02 07:02 AM
You lost this one.Ray2005/12/02 11:54 AM
You lost.tecate2005/12/02 02:55 PM
I second that (NT)savantu2005/12/02 03:22 PM
I wasn't in the game.Ray2005/12/02 04:19 PM
I wasn't in the game.Dean Kent2005/12/02 10:20 PM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/02 05:28 PM
You lost.Anonymous2005/12/02 08:27 PM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/02 08:56 PM
You lost.Dean Kent2005/12/02 10:37 PM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/03 12:08 AM
All about the contextDavid Kanter2005/12/03 02:27 PM
All about the contextBill Todd2005/12/03 02:51 PM
All about the contextDavid Kanter2005/12/03 04:29 PM
You lost.Ray2005/12/02 09:15 PM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/02 10:00 PM
You lost.Ray2005/12/02 11:09 PM
You lost.anonymous2005/12/03 02:42 AM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/03 02:45 PM
Well...David Kanter2005/12/03 03:51 PM
You lost.Ray2005/12/03 05:54 PM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanNIKOLAS2005/12/03 06:25 PM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanBill Todd2005/12/03 09:40 PM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanBill Todd2005/12/03 09:48 PM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanDavid Kanter2005/12/03 09:48 PM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanBill Todd2005/12/03 11:17 PM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanDavid Kanter2005/12/04 12:37 AM
Bill is a self loathing AmericanBill Todd2005/12/04 01:19 AM
This whole thread is a symptom...Dean Kent2005/12/04 09:43 AM
This whole thread is a symptom...tecate2005/12/04 01:17 PM
This whole thread is a symptom...mas2005/12/04 02:02 PM
This whole thread is a symptom...tecate2005/12/05 06:21 AM
This whole thread is a symptom...tecate2005/12/04 01:18 PM
...Temp2005/12/04 03:38 PM
...Dean Kent2005/12/04 05:25 PM
Once more, alasTemp2005/12/05 02:23 AM
Once more, alasDean Kent2005/12/05 08:23 AM
ByeTemp2005/12/05 10:47 AM
Once more, alasBill Todd2005/12/05 10:58 AM
Sungard as a benchmarkTemp2005/12/05 03:42 AM
Sungard as a benchmarkDean Kent2005/12/05 10:06 AM
Sungard as a benchmarkDavid Kanter2005/12/05 08:08 PM
Sungard as a benchmarkTemp2005/12/06 01:45 AM
This whole thread is a symptom...Bill Todd2005/12/04 09:31 PM
This whole thread is a symptom...Dean Kent2005/12/04 09:51 PM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/03 11:14 PM
You lost.Ray2005/12/04 01:06 AM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/04 01:54 AM
Enough with the politics... (NT)David Kanter2005/12/04 03:41 AM
You lost.anonymous2005/12/04 04:03 AM
Well Said! (NT)Anonymous2005/12/04 04:48 AM
You lost.savantu2005/12/04 06:47 AM
You lost.Bill Todd2005/12/04 09:39 PM
You lost.anonymous2005/12/05 02:51 AM
You lost this one.Dean Kent2005/12/02 09:41 PM
You lost this one.Leonov2005/12/03 12:55 AM
You lost this one.tecate2005/12/03 05:27 AM
You lost this one.Leonov2005/12/03 06:33 AM
You lost this one.savantu2005/12/03 10:19 AM
You lost this one.Leonov2005/12/03 12:19 PM
For god sake.Anonymous2005/12/04 04:28 AM
PerfectNo one you'd know2005/12/04 10:52 AM
Perfectmas2005/12/04 12:32 PM
PerfectDean Kent2005/12/04 12:50 PM
Perfectmas2005/12/04 01:16 PM
PerfectDean Kent2005/12/04 04:22 PM
Posts deleted, topic not open for discussionDavid Kanter2005/12/05 02:05 PM
Posts deleted, topic not open for discussionKeith Fiske2005/12/05 05:03 PM
This will not be toleratedDavid Kanter2005/12/04 04:32 PM
For god sake.Leonov2005/12/05 07:10 AM
Back on track...Dean Kent2005/12/05 12:35 PM
Back on track...Leonov2005/12/06 03:08 AM
You lost this one.Temp2005/12/03 04:16 AM
Peer reviewDean Kent2005/12/02 06:22 AM
Peer reviewTemp2005/12/02 12:01 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Onlinean2005/11/29 01:17 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/29 02:17 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Onlinean2005/11/30 07:52 AM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/30 10:42 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDean Kent2005/11/29 04:11 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) Onlineanonymous2005/11/29 05:38 PM
It's calledWilliam Campbell2005/11/29 06:17 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineTemp2005/11/29 02:41 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/29 03:02 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDean Kent2005/11/29 07:41 PM
2 small nitpicksan2005/11/29 02:03 PM
2 small nitpicksDaniel Bizó2005/11/29 03:27 PM
2 small nitpicksan2005/11/30 07:40 AM
2 small nitpicksDaniel Bizó2005/11/30 11:17 AM
2 small nitpicksan2005/11/30 12:30 PM
2 small nitpicksDavid Kanter2005/11/30 02:32 PM
2 small nitpicksan2005/11/30 02:49 PM
Minor Comment about CineBenchRakesh Malik2005/11/29 02:22 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlinePiedPiper2005/11/29 08:04 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlinePiedPiper2005/11/29 08:08 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/11/30 02:05 AM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlinePiedPiper2005/11/30 07:58 PM
Bensley Platform Preview (Part II) OnlineDavid Kanter2005/12/01 01:45 AM
Why no 64-bit tests?PiedPiper2005/11/29 08:37 PM
Why no 64-bit tests?David Kanter2005/11/30 02:07 AM