By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), July 10, 2006 7:35 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Paul DeMone (pdemone@igs.net) on 7/10/06 wrote:
---------------------------
>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 7/10/06 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Paul,
>>
>>So did the 21164 hit 266MHz on 0.5um then?
>>
>
>The 21164 shipped at up to 333 MHz in 0.5 um. There
>was reportedly a 350 MHz SKU in 0.5 um but that may
>have only been low volume for the high end AS 8400
>server.
Gotcha, so I just have to fix the process node, not the entire entry.
DK
---------------------------
>David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 7/10/06 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Paul,
>>
>>So did the 21164 hit 266MHz on 0.5um then?
>>
>
>The 21164 shipped at up to 333 MHz in 0.5 um. There
>was reportedly a 350 MHz SKU in 0.5 um but that may
>have only been low volume for the high end AS 8400
>server.
Gotcha, so I just have to fix the process node, not the entire entry.
DK