By: Tzvetan Mikov (tmikov.delete@this.gmail.com), October 20, 2006 3:30 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Ricardo B (ricardo.b@xxxxx.xx) on 10/20/06 wrote:
---------------------------
>Tzvetan Mikov (tmikov@gmail.com) on 10/20/06 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>I think the agreement is that an architecture with relaxed memory order and acquire/release
>>barriers would be ideal. On such an ideal architecture you will have a penalty after every allocation.
>
>I just realized you are talking about languages and I keep babling about architectures.
It's been informative either way.
---------------------------
>Tzvetan Mikov (tmikov@gmail.com) on 10/20/06 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>I think the agreement is that an architecture with relaxed memory order and acquire/release
>>barriers would be ideal. On such an ideal architecture you will have a penalty after every allocation.
>
>I just realized you are talking about languages and I keep babling about architectures.
It's been informative either way.
