By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), November 7, 2006 4:19 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Since the launch of Woodcrest, earlier this year, Intel has been back on the offensive, with higher performance and improved performance/watt. However, the performance/watt advantages have largely been unmeasured, up until now. In this review, Real World Tech compares the power efficiency of two generations of Intel's dual processor server platform: Dempsey versus Woodcrest. On average they found that using Woodcrest processors to replace Dempsey was roughly twice as power efficient, and typically reduced power draw by around 130 watts for a modestly configured system...quite a coup for a microarchitectural change without a process shrink.
Take a look here for more details, including complete power profiles with 1s sampling rates:
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT110706025321
Regards,
David
Take a look here for more details, including complete power profiles with 1s sampling rates:
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT110706025321
Regards,
David
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | David Kanter | 2006/11/07 04:19 AM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | Michael S | 2006/11/07 05:23 AM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | Del | 2006/11/07 11:06 AM |
Fixed the configuration | David Kanter | 2006/11/07 02:04 PM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | rwessel | 2006/11/07 10:09 AM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | David Wang | 2006/11/07 12:00 PM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | rwessel | 2006/11/07 01:09 PM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | David Wang | 2006/11/07 01:34 PM |
PSU requirement != CPU power requirement | Anonymous | 2006/11/07 09:51 PM |
PSU requirement != CPU power requirement | MS | 2006/11/08 08:44 PM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | questionlp | 2006/11/07 01:33 PM |
Power Supplies | David W. Hess | 2006/11/07 01:41 PM |
Power Supplies | rwessel | 2006/11/07 02:13 PM |
Power Supplies | Aaron Spink | 2006/11/07 02:54 PM |
The PSU in question was 80-85% efficient (NT) | David Kanter | 2006/11/07 03:03 PM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/07 05:01 PM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/07 09:02 PM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 01:34 AM |
small memory config | MS | 2006/11/08 09:35 AM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/08 10:42 AM |
small memory config | MS | 2006/11/08 11:11 AM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 12:53 PM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/08 05:34 PM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 08:35 PM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/09 11:24 AM |
small memory config | Aaron Spink | 2006/11/08 06:30 PM |
small memory config | BM Seer, woodcrest 16GB=430w 32G=510w | 2006/11/09 11:19 AM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/09 12:42 PM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/09 01:04 PM |
small memory config | savantu | 2006/11/10 02:29 AM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/10 10:29 AM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/12 01:08 AM |
small memory config | JasonB | 2006/11/12 03:02 AM |
small memory config | BM Seer | 2006/11/12 10:44 AM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/12 12:12 PM |
small memory config | Howard Chu | 2006/11/12 01:41 PM |
small memory config | Howard Chu | 2006/11/12 01:49 PM |
small memory config | Howard Chu | 2006/11/12 01:57 PM |
Slapd | David Kanter | 2006/11/12 05:21 PM |
Slapd | Howard Chu | 2006/11/13 02:59 AM |
small memory config | Andi Kleen | 2006/11/12 06:40 PM |
small memory config | Michael S | 2006/11/12 01:00 PM |
small memory config | David Kanter | 2006/11/12 05:20 PM |
small memory config | Gabriele Svelto | 2006/11/13 02:46 AM |
Low utilisation misleading | BM Seer, woodcrest 16GB=430w 32G=510w | 2006/11/17 11:54 AM |
Low utilisation misleading | David Kanter | 2006/11/17 12:44 PM |
Low utilisation misleading | BM Seer | 2006/11/17 02:59 PM |
Low utilisation misleading | David Kanter | 2006/11/17 03:34 PM |
Low utilisation misleading | BM Seer | 2006/11/17 04:06 PM |
Low utilisation misleading | David Kanter | 2006/11/17 08:32 PM |
Low utilisation misleading | Andi Kleen | 2006/11/18 10:20 AM |
Low utilisation misleading | JasonB | 2006/11/18 09:01 AM |
Low utilisation misleading | Michael S | 2006/11/18 09:37 AM |
Low utilisation misleading | JasonB | 2006/11/18 10:02 AM |
Low utilisation misleading | Jesper Frimann | 2006/11/19 09:36 AM |
I'd take about 70% as a real number | MS | 2006/11/08 09:40 AM |
I'd take about 70% as a real number | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 03:46 PM |
I'd take about 70% as a real number | Aaron Spink | 2006/11/08 06:44 PM |
thanks, those are good data ..(NT). | MS | 2006/11/08 07:09 PM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | savantu | 2006/11/08 03:36 AM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | MS | 2006/11/08 09:46 AM |
Server profitability benchmark? | Paul A. Clayton | 2006/11/07 12:26 PM |
SpecJbb - software configuration is absent | Michael S | 2006/11/08 01:51 AM |
SpecJbb - software configuration is absent | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 02:26 AM |
SpecJbb - software configuration is absent | Michael S | 2006/11/08 03:01 AM |
Separate or combined articles? | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 12:58 PM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | Vincent Diepeveen | 2006/11/08 09:40 AM |
Power analysis of Woodcrest and Dempsey online | David Kanter | 2006/11/08 01:00 PM |