Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article online

Article: Intel's 45nm Surprise: High-k Dielectrics and Metal Gates
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), January 27, 2007 2:04 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Hi Everyone,

I hope you're all doing well. I wanted to let you know, I just wrapped up a nice article on Intel's newly announced 45nm process.

Intel is the first manufacturer to implement high-k gate dielectrics and metal gate electrodes. More impressive is that the first samples not only booted fine, but were operational at ~2GHz for a reasonable period of time.

http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT012707024759

Read more to find out, and as always questions are welcome.


Regards,

David
 Next Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineDavid Kanter2007/01/27 02:04 AM
  Excellent article David.savantu2007/01/27 02:20 AM
    Penryn StatusDavid Kanter2007/01/27 02:31 AM
      Penryn StatusMS2007/01/27 06:36 PM
        Are you up here PT now?David Kanter2007/01/27 10:32 PM
          Are you up here PT now? - no, FT!MS2007/01/28 09:11 AM
            actuallyMS2007/01/28 05:57 PM
              actuallyAlberto2007/01/29 07:55 AM
                actuallyMS2007/01/29 01:36 PM
                  actuallyJerryA2007/01/29 10:48 PM
  Also....David Kanter2007/01/27 02:33 AM
  Bring back the P4?Doug Siebert2007/01/27 03:22 PM
    Bring back the P4?Linus Torvalds2007/01/27 05:45 PM
      Qualify your statementsJohn H2007/01/27 06:22 PM
        Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/27 08:46 PM
          Qualify your statementsGroo2007/01/28 11:39 AM
            Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/28 12:02 PM
              A short history of PrescottAK2007/02/04 12:28 AM
                A short history of PrescottMichael S2007/02/04 05:50 AM
                  Why ?savantu2007/02/04 06:51 AM
                    Why ?Michael S2007/02/04 08:52 AM
                  A short history of PrescottRob Thorpe2007/02/05 03:29 AM
          Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/01/29 09:37 AM
            Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/30 12:38 PM
              Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/01/31 05:35 AM
                x86 and serversDavid Kanter2007/01/31 10:49 AM
                Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/31 03:52 PM
                  Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/02/01 03:04 AM
                    Qualify your statementsnick2007/02/01 05:30 AM
                      Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/02/01 06:28 AM
                        Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/02/01 03:01 PM
      Bring back the P4?Andi Kleen2007/01/27 07:23 PM
      Bring back the P4?Doug Siebert2007/01/27 11:12 PM
        Bring back the P4?Howard Chu2007/01/27 11:24 PM
          Bring back the P4?Anonymouse2007/01/28 10:00 AM
            Bring back the P4?Linus Torvalds2007/01/28 11:43 AM
              Bring back the P4?Phil Jones2007/01/29 12:14 AM
      Which P4?Rob Thorpe2007/01/29 07:11 AM
        Which P4?Michael S2007/01/29 08:41 AM
          Which P4?Rob Thorpe2007/01/29 09:07 AM
            Northwood, Willamette and PrescottDavid Kanter2007/01/29 09:38 AM
              NReading comprehesion problemRob Thorpe2007/01/29 09:42 AM
              Northwood, Willamette and Prescottanonymous2007/01/29 10:51 AM
            Which P4?Michael S2007/01/29 09:40 AM
    Bring back the P4?mpx2007/01/29 10:44 AM
  Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineHoward Chu2007/01/27 11:28 PM
    Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineDavid Kanter2007/01/28 02:31 AM
      Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineJerryA2007/01/29 11:05 PM
        Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineDavid Kanter2007/01/30 09:55 AM
  Error on page 3James2007/01/28 10:42 AM
    Error on page 3David Kanter2007/01/28 11:42 AM
  Nice article David. (NT)Marc M.2007/01/28 03:43 PM
  79 sq mm dual core Penryn?Doug Siebert2007/01/29 10:52 AM
    Hans' analysis differs (and I believe him)Doug Siebert2007/01/29 10:53 AM
      Hans' analysis differs (and I believe him)MS2007/01/30 07:32 PM
    It was actually calculated MS2007/01/30 07:29 PM
      It was actually calculated Wouter Tinus2007/01/31 12:03 AM
        It was actually calculated MS2007/01/31 08:06 AM
          It was actually calculated IntelUser20002007/01/31 06:38 PM
  Question on Figure 2VBG2007/01/29 02:10 PM
    Question on Figure 2JerryA2007/01/29 10:53 PM
      Question on Figure 2JerryA2007/01/29 10:55 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?