Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article online

Article: Intel's 45nm Surprise: High-k Dielectrics and Metal Gates
By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), January 27, 2007 3:04 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Hi Everyone,

I hope you're all doing well. I wanted to let you know, I just wrapped up a nice article on Intel's newly announced 45nm process.

Intel is the first manufacturer to implement high-k gate dielectrics and metal gate electrodes. More impressive is that the first samples not only booted fine, but were operational at ~2GHz for a reasonable period of time.

http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT012707024759

Read more to find out, and as always questions are welcome.


Regards,

David
 Next Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineDavid Kanter2007/01/27 03:04 AM
  Excellent article David.savantu2007/01/27 03:20 AM
    Penryn StatusDavid Kanter2007/01/27 03:31 AM
      Penryn StatusMS2007/01/27 07:36 PM
        Are you up here PT now?David Kanter2007/01/27 11:32 PM
          Are you up here PT now? - no, FT!MS2007/01/28 10:11 AM
            actuallyMS2007/01/28 06:57 PM
              actuallyAlberto2007/01/29 08:55 AM
                actuallyMS2007/01/29 02:36 PM
                  actuallyJerryA2007/01/29 11:48 PM
  Also....David Kanter2007/01/27 03:33 AM
  Bring back the P4?Doug Siebert2007/01/27 04:22 PM
    Bring back the P4?Linus Torvalds2007/01/27 06:45 PM
      Qualify your statementsJohn H2007/01/27 07:22 PM
        Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/27 09:46 PM
          Qualify your statementsGroo2007/01/28 12:39 PM
            Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/28 01:02 PM
              A short history of PrescottAK2007/02/04 01:28 AM
                A short history of PrescottMichael S2007/02/04 06:50 AM
                  Why ?savantu2007/02/04 07:51 AM
                    Why ?Michael S2007/02/04 09:52 AM
                  A short history of PrescottRob Thorpe2007/02/05 04:29 AM
          Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/01/29 10:37 AM
            Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/30 01:38 PM
              Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/01/31 06:35 AM
                x86 and serversDavid Kanter2007/01/31 11:49 AM
                Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/01/31 04:52 PM
                  Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/02/01 04:04 AM
                    Qualify your statementsnick2007/02/01 06:30 AM
                      Qualify your statementsMichael S2007/02/01 07:28 AM
                        Qualify your statementsLinus Torvalds2007/02/01 04:01 PM
      Bring back the P4?Andi Kleen2007/01/27 08:23 PM
      Bring back the P4?Doug Siebert2007/01/28 12:12 AM
        Bring back the P4?Howard Chu2007/01/28 12:24 AM
          Bring back the P4?Anonymouse2007/01/28 11:00 AM
            Bring back the P4?Linus Torvalds2007/01/28 12:43 PM
              Bring back the P4?Phil Jones2007/01/29 01:14 AM
      Which P4?Rob Thorpe2007/01/29 08:11 AM
        Which P4?Michael S2007/01/29 09:41 AM
          Which P4?Rob Thorpe2007/01/29 10:07 AM
            Northwood, Willamette and PrescottDavid Kanter2007/01/29 10:38 AM
              NReading comprehesion problemRob Thorpe2007/01/29 10:42 AM
              Northwood, Willamette and Prescottanonymous2007/01/29 11:51 AM
            Which P4?Michael S2007/01/29 10:40 AM
    Bring back the P4?mpx2007/01/29 11:44 AM
  Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineHoward Chu2007/01/28 12:28 AM
    Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineDavid Kanter2007/01/28 03:31 AM
      Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineJerryA2007/01/30 12:05 AM
        Intel's 45nm Surprise - Article onlineDavid Kanter2007/01/30 10:55 AM
  Error on page 3James2007/01/28 11:42 AM
    Error on page 3David Kanter2007/01/28 12:42 PM
  Nice article David. (NT)Marc M.2007/01/28 04:43 PM
  79 sq mm dual core Penryn?Doug Siebert2007/01/29 11:52 AM
    Hans' analysis differs (and I believe him)Doug Siebert2007/01/29 11:53 AM
      Hans' analysis differs (and I believe him)MS2007/01/30 08:32 PM
    It was actually calculated MS2007/01/30 08:29 PM
      It was actually calculated Wouter Tinus2007/01/31 01:03 AM
        It was actually calculated MS2007/01/31 09:06 AM
          It was actually calculated IntelUser20002007/01/31 07:38 PM
  Question on Figure 2VBG2007/01/29 03:10 PM
    Question on Figure 2JerryA2007/01/29 11:53 PM
      Question on Figure 2JerryA2007/01/29 11:55 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell green?