By: JasonB (no.delete@this.spam.com), May 13, 2007 7:43 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Dean Kent (dkent@realworldtech.com) on 5/12/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Cool. Thanks for that info. Since I was referring to desktop users, I think we
>can safely exclude Windows Server 2003 from being any significant percentage of
>that group.
I don't do this myself, and I don't have any numbers to back it up, but I have the impression that quite a few people use(d) Windows Server 2003 as a development platform, so you may not want to be too hasty in excluding it.
(All except the most basic MSDN subscription includes all versions of Windows, so you can install whatever version(s) you want to develop on. One possible motive for choosing Windows Server 2003 is that I'm pretty sure it was available in a 64 bit version well before Windows XP was.)
---------------------------
>Cool. Thanks for that info. Since I was referring to desktop users, I think we
>can safely exclude Windows Server 2003 from being any significant percentage of
>that group.
I don't do this myself, and I don't have any numbers to back it up, but I have the impression that quite a few people use(d) Windows Server 2003 as a development platform, so you may not want to be too hasty in excluding it.
(All except the most basic MSDN subscription includes all versions of Windows, so you can install whatever version(s) you want to develop on. One possible motive for choosing Windows Server 2003 is that I'm pretty sure it was available in a 64 bit version well before Windows XP was.)
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | mas | 2007/05/05 12:59 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | David Kanter | 2007/05/05 02:33 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Dean Kent | 2007/05/05 03:35 PM |
| K8 vs Win64 timeline | anonymous | 2007/05/05 06:19 PM |
| Yes, I misremembered... | Dean Kent | 2007/05/05 10:03 PM |
| Rock | Daniel Bizó | 2007/05/06 02:34 AM |
| Rock | Dean Kent | 2007/05/06 07:11 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Joe | 2007/05/06 11:24 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Dean Kent | 2007/05/06 11:49 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/06 12:09 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | anon | 2007/05/07 01:32 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Rakesh Malik | 2007/05/07 09:36 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Michael S | 2007/05/07 10:06 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | anon | 2007/05/07 09:48 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Rakesh Malik | 2007/05/08 06:45 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | anon | 2007/05/08 05:30 PM |
| Wow. (nt) | Brannon | 2007/05/08 06:16 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | rwessel | 2007/05/08 09:48 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | JS | 2007/05/08 10:07 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | JS | 2007/05/09 06:44 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Rakesh Malik | 2007/05/09 05:35 AM |
| Much ado about x | Michael S | 2007/05/09 09:39 AM |
| Call it x86-64 | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/09 10:27 AM |
| (i)AMD64 | Michael S | 2007/05/09 12:16 PM |
| (i)AMD64 | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/09 12:29 PM |
| (i)AMD64 | Groo | 2007/05/09 04:45 PM |
| TIFNAA | anonymous | 2007/05/09 05:49 PM |
| Inspired by FYR Macedonia? (NT) | Michael S | 2007/05/09 11:21 PM |
| More likely... | rwessel | 2007/05/10 12:39 AM |
| TIFNAA | Gabriele Svelto | 2007/05/09 11:57 PM |
| (i)AMD64 | James | 2007/05/10 02:27 AM |
| i86 | Dean Kent | 2007/05/09 12:30 PM |
| (i)AMD64 | Max | 2007/05/09 01:28 PM |
| wide86? long86? | hobold | 2007/05/10 05:05 AM |
| x87 perhaps, it is one more. :) (NT) | Groo | 2007/05/10 05:50 AM |
| x86+ | Dean Kent | 2007/05/10 08:44 AM |
| Does it really matter? | Doug Siebert | 2007/05/10 09:10 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Marcin Niewiadomski | 2007/05/10 11:50 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/11 06:11 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | rwessel | 2007/05/11 02:46 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/11 06:03 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Michael S | 2007/05/12 10:49 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/12 01:05 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Michael S | 2007/05/12 01:25 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/12 03:39 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | JasonB | 2007/05/13 07:43 AM |
| client consolidation | Michael S | 2007/05/13 08:37 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 03:44 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | rwessel | 2007/05/14 02:42 PM |
| What's your point? | Doug Siebert | 2007/05/11 02:56 PM |
| What's your point? | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/11 04:15 PM |
| What's your point? | Doug Siebert | 2007/05/13 03:11 PM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/13 07:04 PM |
| What's your point? | JasonB | 2007/05/14 02:06 AM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 07:20 AM |
| What's your point? | JasonB | 2007/05/14 04:35 PM |
| What's your point? | JasonB | 2007/05/14 07:35 PM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 08:12 PM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/11 06:06 PM |
| What's your point? | Stephen H | 2007/05/13 01:55 AM |
| Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE? | David W. Hess | 2007/05/13 08:37 AM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/13 10:20 AM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Dean Kent | 2007/05/13 10:49 AM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | David W. Hess | 2007/05/13 12:37 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 01:44 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | S. Rao | 2007/05/13 03:00 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 05:32 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | S. Rao | 2007/05/14 12:19 AM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/13 03:46 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 05:23 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | JasonB | 2007/05/13 06:37 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 08:31 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | JasonB | 2007/05/14 01:50 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 08:56 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | rwessel | 2007/05/14 03:40 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | David W. Hess | 2007/05/14 04:07 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | rwessel | 2007/05/14 04:51 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 05:40 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | rwessel | 2007/05/14 06:09 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Howard Chu | 2007/05/14 11:17 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Jukka Larja | 2007/05/14 11:30 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 01:54 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Howard Chu | 2007/05/15 03:35 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Groo | 2007/05/15 07:34 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | Matt Sayler | 2007/05/15 06:23 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | Wes Felter | 2007/05/15 08:37 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | Anonymous | 2007/05/15 10:49 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | anon2 | 2007/05/15 07:13 PM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Paul | 2007/05/13 03:40 PM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Peter Arremann | 2007/05/13 05:38 PM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Henrik S | 2007/05/14 03:31 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | slacker | 2007/05/13 03:56 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | nick | 2007/05/13 05:42 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Howard Chu | 2007/05/14 02:52 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 09:19 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | anon2 | 2007/05/14 08:26 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 09:01 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 09:16 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/14 11:57 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | JasonB | 2007/05/14 04:48 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 07:36 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 02:40 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 03:32 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 06:41 AM |
| PS | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 06:50 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 09:07 AM |
| Modern web browsing | S. Rao | 2007/05/16 09:16 AM |
| Aha! | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 09:27 AM |
| Aha! | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 09:32 AM |
| Aha! | S. Rao | 2007/05/16 10:34 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 10:00 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Vincent Diepeveen | 2007/05/16 10:10 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Paul | 2007/05/16 03:01 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Vincent Diepeveen | 2007/05/17 03:05 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | anon2 | 2007/05/15 01:35 AM |
| Splits vs page allocations? | Matt Sayler | 2007/05/15 07:33 AM |
| What's your point? | Michael S | 2007/05/13 08:55 AM |
| What's your point? | anonymous | 2007/05/13 11:08 AM |
| What's your point? | Michael S | 2007/05/13 11:31 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | JasonB | 2007/05/13 07:16 AM |
| x864 =) (NT) | some1 | 2007/05/15 03:03 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | IntelUser2000 | 2007/05/06 02:27 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | m | 2007/05/13 08:05 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | mas | 2007/05/15 09:40 AM |
