By: Howard Chu (hyc.delete@this.symas.com), May 14, 2007 10:17 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Tzvetan Mikov (tzvetanmi@yahoo.com) on 5/13/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>So it is conceivable that the trouble you app is having with more than 1.5GB RAM
>under XP may not be so much a HIGHMEM issue, but a matter of XP not being optimized
>for such amount of RAM. The kernel is pretty old.
That's probably true. When I ran WindowsXP on my Centrino laptop with 2GB RAM, it only tended to use at most 768MB or so. Even when I had tweaked the registry to use all available RAM for fs cache it never used more than about 200MB for cache, and it paged out everything else. Even though over 1.2GB of free RAM was available. The only time I saw more than 1GB of RAM in use was when a particular app specifically allocated that much. (Typically either VMware with a 1GB VM, or some audio or video editor...)
> So, it would be interesting to run the same test with 32-bit Vista.
Now I run Linux as my primary OS and Windows is in the VM, but I haven't fired that up in months. Just haven't needed it any more. I don't expect I'll ever install another MS OS again.
---------------------------
>So it is conceivable that the trouble you app is having with more than 1.5GB RAM
>under XP may not be so much a HIGHMEM issue, but a matter of XP not being optimized
>for such amount of RAM. The kernel is pretty old.
That's probably true. When I ran WindowsXP on my Centrino laptop with 2GB RAM, it only tended to use at most 768MB or so. Even when I had tweaked the registry to use all available RAM for fs cache it never used more than about 200MB for cache, and it paged out everything else. Even though over 1.2GB of free RAM was available. The only time I saw more than 1GB of RAM in use was when a particular app specifically allocated that much. (Typically either VMware with a 1GB VM, or some audio or video editor...)
> So, it would be interesting to run the same test with 32-bit Vista.
Now I run Linux as my primary OS and Windows is in the VM, but I haven't fired that up in months. Just haven't needed it any more. I don't expect I'll ever install another MS OS again.
| Topic | Posted By | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | mas | 2007/05/05 11:59 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | David Kanter | 2007/05/05 01:33 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Dean Kent | 2007/05/05 02:35 PM |
| K8 vs Win64 timeline | anonymous | 2007/05/05 05:19 PM |
| Yes, I misremembered... | Dean Kent | 2007/05/05 09:03 PM |
| Rock | Daniel Bizó | 2007/05/06 01:34 AM |
| Rock | Dean Kent | 2007/05/06 06:11 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Joe | 2007/05/06 10:24 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Dean Kent | 2007/05/06 10:49 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/06 11:09 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | anon | 2007/05/07 12:32 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Rakesh Malik | 2007/05/07 08:36 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Michael S | 2007/05/07 09:06 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | anon | 2007/05/07 08:48 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Rakesh Malik | 2007/05/08 05:45 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | anon | 2007/05/08 04:30 PM |
| Wow. (nt) | Brannon | 2007/05/08 05:16 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | rwessel | 2007/05/08 08:48 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | JS | 2007/05/08 09:07 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | JS | 2007/05/09 05:44 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | Rakesh Malik | 2007/05/09 04:35 AM |
| Much ado about x | Michael S | 2007/05/09 08:39 AM |
| Call it x86-64 | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/09 09:27 AM |
| (i)AMD64 | Michael S | 2007/05/09 11:16 AM |
| (i)AMD64 | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/09 11:29 AM |
| (i)AMD64 | Groo | 2007/05/09 03:45 PM |
| TIFNAA | anonymous | 2007/05/09 04:49 PM |
| Inspired by FYR Macedonia? (NT) | Michael S | 2007/05/09 10:21 PM |
| More likely... | rwessel | 2007/05/09 11:39 PM |
| TIFNAA | Gabriele Svelto | 2007/05/09 10:57 PM |
| (i)AMD64 | James | 2007/05/10 01:27 AM |
| i86 | Dean Kent | 2007/05/09 11:30 AM |
| (i)AMD64 | Max | 2007/05/09 12:28 PM |
| wide86? long86? | hobold | 2007/05/10 04:05 AM |
| x87 perhaps, it is one more. :) (NT) | Groo | 2007/05/10 04:50 AM |
| x86+ | Dean Kent | 2007/05/10 07:44 AM |
| Does it really matter? | Doug Siebert | 2007/05/10 08:10 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Marcin Niewiadomski | 2007/05/10 10:50 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/11 05:11 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | rwessel | 2007/05/11 01:46 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/11 05:03 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Michael S | 2007/05/12 09:49 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/12 12:05 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Michael S | 2007/05/12 12:25 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Dean Kent | 2007/05/12 02:39 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | JasonB | 2007/05/13 06:43 AM |
| client consolidation | Michael S | 2007/05/13 07:37 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 02:44 PM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | rwessel | 2007/05/14 01:42 PM |
| What's your point? | Doug Siebert | 2007/05/11 01:56 PM |
| What's your point? | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/11 03:15 PM |
| What's your point? | Doug Siebert | 2007/05/13 02:11 PM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/13 06:04 PM |
| What's your point? | JasonB | 2007/05/14 01:06 AM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 06:20 AM |
| What's your point? | JasonB | 2007/05/14 03:35 PM |
| What's your point? | JasonB | 2007/05/14 06:35 PM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 07:12 PM |
| What's your point? | Dean Kent | 2007/05/11 05:06 PM |
| What's your point? | Stephen H | 2007/05/13 12:55 AM |
| Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE? | David W. Hess | 2007/05/13 07:37 AM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/13 09:20 AM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Dean Kent | 2007/05/13 09:49 AM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | David W. Hess | 2007/05/13 11:37 AM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 12:44 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | S. Rao | 2007/05/13 02:00 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 04:32 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | S. Rao | 2007/05/13 11:19 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/13 02:46 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 04:23 PM |
| > 1 GB RAM on a 32-bit system | JasonB | 2007/05/13 05:37 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/13 07:31 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | JasonB | 2007/05/14 12:50 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 07:56 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | rwessel | 2007/05/14 02:40 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | David W. Hess | 2007/05/14 03:07 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | rwessel | 2007/05/14 03:51 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 04:40 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | rwessel | 2007/05/14 05:09 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Howard Chu | 2007/05/14 10:17 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Jukka Larja | 2007/05/14 10:30 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 12:54 PM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Howard Chu | 2007/05/15 02:35 AM |
| Windows manages memory differently | Groo | 2007/05/15 06:34 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | Matt Sayler | 2007/05/15 05:23 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | Wes Felter | 2007/05/15 07:37 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | Anonymous | 2007/05/15 09:49 AM |
| Anyone know what OS X (10.4, Intel, desktop) does? | anon2 | 2007/05/15 06:13 PM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Paul | 2007/05/13 02:40 PM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Peter Arremann | 2007/05/13 04:38 PM |
| PAE sucks (Why didn't MS take advantage of PAE?) | Henrik S | 2007/05/14 02:31 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | slacker | 2007/05/13 02:56 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | nick | 2007/05/13 04:42 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Howard Chu | 2007/05/14 01:52 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 08:19 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | anon2 | 2007/05/14 07:26 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Tzvetan Mikov | 2007/05/14 08:01 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 08:16 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Linus Torvalds | 2007/05/14 10:57 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | JasonB | 2007/05/14 03:48 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/14 06:36 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 01:40 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 02:32 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 05:41 AM |
| PS | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 05:50 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 08:07 AM |
| Modern web browsing | S. Rao | 2007/05/16 08:16 AM |
| Aha! | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 08:27 AM |
| Aha! | Dean Kent | 2007/05/16 08:32 AM |
| Aha! | S. Rao | 2007/05/16 09:34 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Ricardo B | 2007/05/16 09:00 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Vincent Diepeveen | 2007/05/16 09:10 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | Paul | 2007/05/16 02:01 PM |
| The fragility of your argument | Vincent Diepeveen | 2007/05/17 02:05 AM |
| The fragility of your argument | anon2 | 2007/05/15 12:35 AM |
| Splits vs page allocations? | Matt Sayler | 2007/05/15 06:33 AM |
| What's your point? | Michael S | 2007/05/13 07:55 AM |
| What's your point? | anonymous | 2007/05/13 10:08 AM |
| What's your point? | Michael S | 2007/05/13 10:31 AM |
| let's stay with x86-64 for now, please | JasonB | 2007/05/13 06:16 AM |
| x864 =) (NT) | some1 | 2007/05/15 02:03 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | IntelUser2000 | 2007/05/06 01:27 PM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | m | 2007/05/13 07:05 AM |
| Rock/Tukwila rumors | mas | 2007/05/15 08:40 AM |
