Dean Kent (dkent@realworldtech.com) on 7/2/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Sorry, I didn't realize your intent was to turn this into a rant against Intel and
>your presumptions about activities the management engages in - without so much as evidence.
>
>I'm not going to be drawn into this. I thought we were talking about published
>errata, and whether it is something to be concerned about.
>
>Nice try, but I'm not going to be sucked into this quagmire. Later.
>
>Regards,
>Dean

You invoke children - i point out that Intel execs are not children. You
suddenly realise that you have blown your argument. What next? How to save
face. Got it!

Accuse the protagonist of wanting to have a rant - very clever. The usual
cop out for someone who does not want to admit they have lost the argument.

This cop out is used by all the intellectually challenged pretenders on the
web that are trying to mix in with the big boys.

No wonder Pauol Demone left in disgust.

P.S. Dont forget to delete this post and close the thread. That gives you some additonal protection from the truth.