Linux on Desktops

By: Paul (no.delete@this.thanks.com), July 25, 2007 11:42 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Shankhadeep (shank15217@gmail.com) on 7/25/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Con quit because he believed that there is no enough focus on desktop performance
>in kernel development. One of the key points was that the current cpu scheduler
>in standard kernels isn't appropriate for desktops. As we are approaching quad cpu
>desktops in the mainstream will there be a renewed focus on improving Linux performance on the desktop?

Given that stuff that was regarded as "Enterprise" a few years ago such as decent SMP scaling (and SMP support at all), >1GB memory support on x86 and even NUMA. Is now "Desktop" I would say the position of having a keeping a single kernel for everything (with a few configurable options) rather than trying to tweak for a particular segment as Con was trying to do has been entirely vindicated.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Linux on DesktopsShankhadeep2007/07/25 10:46 AM
  Linux on DesktopsPaul2007/07/25 11:42 AM
    Linux on DesktopsShankhadeep2007/07/25 02:15 PM
      Linux on DesktopsMax2007/07/25 02:43 PM
        Linux on DesktopsJasonB2007/07/26 11:38 PM
    Linux on DesktopsFoo_2007/07/26 02:53 AM
      Linux on DesktopsMichael S2007/07/26 04:22 AM
      Linux on DesktopsPaul2007/07/26 01:56 PM
        Linux on DesktopsFoo_2007/07/26 02:34 PM
          Linux on DesktopsJukka Larja2007/07/27 04:42 AM
            Linux on DesktopsShankhadeep2007/07/27 11:52 AM
              Linux on DesktopsShankhadeep2007/07/27 12:00 PM
                Linux on Desktops_Arthur2007/07/27 02:56 PM
  Linux on DesktopsLinus Torvalds2007/07/25 12:03 PM
    Linux on DesktopsShankhadeep2007/07/25 01:36 PM
      Linux on DesktopsArun Ramakrishnan2007/07/25 08:11 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?