By: Shankhadeep (shank15217.delete@this.gmail.com), July 25, 2007 2:15 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
But is the focus on Enterprise workloads a bit too much that desktop performance suffers? Consider the facilities Microsoft introduced in Windows Vista regarding software prefetching for example, or a better driver model for video card 3d acceleration. Are there developers looking into these features for Linux and would changes to the core kernel facilitate better performance/stability/usability?
Paul (no@thanks.com) on 7/25/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Shankhadeep (shank15217@gmail.com) on 7/25/07 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Con quit because he believed that there is no enough focus on desktop performance
>>in kernel development. One of the key points was that the current cpu scheduler
>>in standard kernels isn't appropriate for desktops. As we are approaching quad cpu
>>desktops in the mainstream will there be a renewed focus on improving Linux performance on the desktop?
>
>Given that stuff that was regarded as "Enterprise" a few years ago such as decent
>SMP scaling (and SMP support at all), >1GB memory support on x86 and even NUMA.
>Is now "Desktop" I would say the position of having a keeping a single kernel for
>everything (with a few configurable options) rather than trying to tweak for a particular
>segment as Con was trying to do has been entirely vindicated.
Paul (no@thanks.com) on 7/25/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Shankhadeep (shank15217@gmail.com) on 7/25/07 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>Con quit because he believed that there is no enough focus on desktop performance
>>in kernel development. One of the key points was that the current cpu scheduler
>>in standard kernels isn't appropriate for desktops. As we are approaching quad cpu
>>desktops in the mainstream will there be a renewed focus on improving Linux performance on the desktop?
>
>Given that stuff that was regarded as "Enterprise" a few years ago such as decent
>SMP scaling (and SMP support at all), >1GB memory support on x86 and even NUMA.
>Is now "Desktop" I would say the position of having a keeping a single kernel for
>everything (with a few configurable options) rather than trying to tweak for a particular
>segment as Con was trying to do has been entirely vindicated.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/25 10:46 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Paul | 2007/07/25 11:42 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/25 02:15 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Max | 2007/07/25 02:43 PM |
Linux on Desktops | JasonB | 2007/07/26 11:38 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Foo_ | 2007/07/26 02:53 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Michael S | 2007/07/26 04:22 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Paul | 2007/07/26 01:56 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Foo_ | 2007/07/26 02:34 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Jukka Larja | 2007/07/27 04:42 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/27 11:52 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/27 12:00 PM |
Linux on Desktops | _Arthur | 2007/07/27 02:56 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Linus Torvalds | 2007/07/25 12:03 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/25 01:36 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Arun Ramakrishnan | 2007/07/25 08:11 PM |