By: _Arthur (Arthur_.delete@this.sympatico.ca), July 27, 2007 2:56 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Shankhadeep (shank15217@yahoo.com) on 7/27/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Err I meant to say an improved scheduler that focuses on desktop performance as
>has recently been integrated into the kernel. I think missed the caffeine train today..
The CFS doesn't focus on desktop peformance; the CFS is expected to do well under all kinds of loads, uncluding server loads.
I don't know why Ingo chose a red-black tree over a simple binary heap.
---------------------------
>Err I meant to say an improved scheduler that focuses on desktop performance as
>has recently been integrated into the kernel. I think missed the caffeine train today..
The CFS doesn't focus on desktop peformance; the CFS is expected to do well under all kinds of loads, uncluding server loads.
I don't know why Ingo chose a red-black tree over a simple binary heap.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/25 10:46 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Paul | 2007/07/25 11:42 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/25 02:15 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Max | 2007/07/25 02:43 PM |
Linux on Desktops | JasonB | 2007/07/26 11:38 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Foo_ | 2007/07/26 02:53 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Michael S | 2007/07/26 04:22 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Paul | 2007/07/26 01:56 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Foo_ | 2007/07/26 02:34 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Jukka Larja | 2007/07/27 04:42 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/27 11:52 AM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/27 12:00 PM |
Linux on Desktops | _Arthur | 2007/07/27 02:56 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Linus Torvalds | 2007/07/25 12:03 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Shankhadeep | 2007/07/25 01:36 PM |
Linux on Desktops | Arun Ramakrishnan | 2007/07/25 08:11 PM |