By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), August 31, 2007 6:39 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Mr. Camel (a@b.c) on 8/31/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>CSI *is* the system architecture. And anyway, I thought the point of it was to
>have a common system architecture for both Xeon and Itanium. So, when you say "the
>system architectures are too different" (your quote corrected >for proper English) I don't quite know what you mean.
CSI for x86 and CSI for Itanium are different. I made that quite clear in the article. They share a lot, but there are some differences.
DK
---------------------------
>CSI *is* the system architecture. And anyway, I thought the point of it was to
>have a common system architecture for both Xeon and Itanium. So, when you say "the
>system architectures are too different" (your quote corrected >for proper English) I don't quite know what you mean.
CSI for x86 and CSI for Itanium are different. I made that quite clear in the article. They share a lot, but there are some differences.
DK