Article: Harpertown Performance Preview
By: Anonymous1 (anon.delete@this.anon.anon), November 9, 2007 8:58 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 11/9/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>I just finished up my preview of Harpertown, and nary a moment too soon. It's only
>a preview if it gets up before the product is released, so I managed it at the last moment.
>
>This was the hardest review I've done yet...largely because I had to evacuate my
>testing facility about half way through the testing.
>
>Anyway, take a look - there is actually some relatively interesting analysis that
>I have to use in order to estimate the IPC improvement from Clovertown to Harpertown.
>I had two processors of different frequencies, and all things being equal a 2.33GHz
>processor will have a higher IPC than a 3GHz one...which made the estimates rather tricky.
>
>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT110907063310
>
>Take a read and feedback is always welcome.
>
>Regards,
>
>David
Thanks for writing up the article.
It's not clear to me how much of the performance differential is due to Harpertown vs. Clovertown, and how much is Stoakley vs. Bensley. Do you have any insights?
A pure Stoakley vs. Bensley review would be interesting. Maybe you could put the Harpertown chip in the Bensley platform and see how it performs?
---------------------------
>I just finished up my preview of Harpertown, and nary a moment too soon. It's only
>a preview if it gets up before the product is released, so I managed it at the last moment.
>
>This was the hardest review I've done yet...largely because I had to evacuate my
>testing facility about half way through the testing.
>
>Anyway, take a look - there is actually some relatively interesting analysis that
>I have to use in order to estimate the IPC improvement from Clovertown to Harpertown.
>I had two processors of different frequencies, and all things being equal a 2.33GHz
>processor will have a higher IPC than a 3GHz one...which made the estimates rather tricky.
>
>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT110907063310
>
>Take a read and feedback is always welcome.
>
>Regards,
>
>David
Thanks for writing up the article.
It's not clear to me how much of the performance differential is due to Harpertown vs. Clovertown, and how much is Stoakley vs. Bensley. Do you have any insights?
A pure Stoakley vs. Bensley review would be interesting. Maybe you could put the Harpertown chip in the Bensley platform and see how it performs?
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/09 06:44 AM |
Stoakley vs. Bensley | Anonymous1 | 2007/11/09 08:58 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Marcin Niewiadomski | 2007/11/09 11:59 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/09 06:51 PM |
So... | anonymous | 2007/11/09 07:47 PM |
So... | anon | 2007/11/09 08:49 PM |
So... | anonymous | 2007/11/09 09:25 PM |
So... | anon | 2007/11/09 10:50 PM |
That's just how I write | David Kanter | 2007/11/10 12:44 PM |
That's just how I write | anonymous | 2007/11/10 04:58 PM |
That's just how I write | Dean Kent | 2007/11/10 07:27 PM |
;-) | anonymous | 2007/11/10 07:31 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | anonymous | 2007/11/09 11:10 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/10 01:49 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Marcin Niewiadomski | 2007/11/10 03:10 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Marcin Dalecki | 2007/11/11 04:01 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Joe Chang | 2007/11/11 09:56 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Joe Chang | 2007/11/11 06:15 PM |
xmlmark and jbb | Henrik S | 2007/11/09 12:30 PM |
also | Henrik S | 2007/11/09 12:43 PM |
also | David Kanter | 2007/11/09 06:52 PM |
also | Henrik S | 2007/11/10 12:09 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | *(&^ | 2007/11/09 11:38 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/10 01:53 PM |
Supermicro MB | gpriatko | 2007/11/11 12:48 PM |
Supermicro MB | gpriatko | 2007/11/12 01:48 PM |
Supermicro MB | David Kanter | 2007/11/13 12:52 AM |
800 MHz vs 667 MHz FB-DIMMs | gpriatko | 2007/11/13 08:09 PM |
800 MHz vs 667 MHz FB-DIMMs | David Kanter | 2007/11/14 12:38 AM |
800 MHz vs 667 MHz FB-DIMMs | gpriatko | 2007/11/15 08:29 PM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | blaine | 2007/11/12 05:37 PM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | Andi Kleen | 2007/11/12 05:57 PM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | Michael S | 2007/11/13 01:45 AM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | Michael S | 2007/11/13 02:05 AM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | David Kanter | 2007/11/13 03:46 AM |