Article: Harpertown Performance Preview
By: Marcin Dalecki (martin.delete@this.dalecki.de), November 11, 2007 4:01 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Marcin Niewiadomski (marcin.niewiadomski@gmail.com) on 11/10/07 wrote:
---------------------------
>Thank You for explanation and link. However I admit that I hoped for more "measurable"
>information (like in DB server workloads it can reduce FSB traffic by x%)
For a DB load the cache snoop handling should have no really noticable impact. Those loads tend to pin tasks to particular CPUs anyway and tend to be IO bound - and there you will gain the most from the huge improvement on PCI throughput availibity. Depending on how you stuff your system with IO subsystems this could have an overallimpact even on the order of hunderd of percents. And then of course remember that you can staff more RAM in to the system.
---------------------------
>Thank You for explanation and link. However I admit that I hoped for more "measurable"
>information (like in DB server workloads it can reduce FSB traffic by x%)
For a DB load the cache snoop handling should have no really noticable impact. Those loads tend to pin tasks to particular CPUs anyway and tend to be IO bound - and there you will gain the most from the huge improvement on PCI throughput availibity. Depending on how you stuff your system with IO subsystems this could have an overallimpact even on the order of hunderd of percents. And then of course remember that you can staff more RAM in to the system.
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/09 06:44 AM |
Stoakley vs. Bensley | Anonymous1 | 2007/11/09 08:58 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Marcin Niewiadomski | 2007/11/09 11:59 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/09 06:51 PM |
So... | anonymous | 2007/11/09 07:47 PM |
So... | anon | 2007/11/09 08:49 PM |
So... | anonymous | 2007/11/09 09:25 PM |
So... | anon | 2007/11/09 10:50 PM |
That's just how I write | David Kanter | 2007/11/10 12:44 PM |
That's just how I write | anonymous | 2007/11/10 04:58 PM |
That's just how I write | Dean Kent | 2007/11/10 07:27 PM |
;-) | anonymous | 2007/11/10 07:31 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | anonymous | 2007/11/09 11:10 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/10 01:49 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Marcin Niewiadomski | 2007/11/10 03:10 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Marcin Dalecki | 2007/11/11 04:01 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Joe Chang | 2007/11/11 09:56 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | Joe Chang | 2007/11/11 06:15 PM |
xmlmark and jbb | Henrik S | 2007/11/09 12:30 PM |
also | Henrik S | 2007/11/09 12:43 PM |
also | David Kanter | 2007/11/09 06:52 PM |
also | Henrik S | 2007/11/10 12:09 AM |
Harpertown Preview Online | *(&^ | 2007/11/09 11:38 PM |
Harpertown Preview Online | David Kanter | 2007/11/10 01:53 PM |
Supermicro MB | gpriatko | 2007/11/11 12:48 PM |
Supermicro MB | gpriatko | 2007/11/12 01:48 PM |
Supermicro MB | David Kanter | 2007/11/13 12:52 AM |
800 MHz vs 667 MHz FB-DIMMs | gpriatko | 2007/11/13 08:09 PM |
800 MHz vs 667 MHz FB-DIMMs | David Kanter | 2007/11/14 12:38 AM |
800 MHz vs 667 MHz FB-DIMMs | gpriatko | 2007/11/15 08:29 PM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | blaine | 2007/11/12 05:37 PM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | Andi Kleen | 2007/11/12 05:57 PM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | Michael S | 2007/11/13 01:45 AM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | Michael S | 2007/11/13 02:05 AM |
New O-O-O transaction Mode? | David Kanter | 2007/11/13 03:46 AM |