Reg file vs. forwarding network

By: Peter (not.delete@this.likely.com), June 23, 2008 3:44 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
>>I suspect that given the cost of wires today a wide issue >processor with lots of
>>execution resource would run into timing issues if it >tried to do a lot of forwarding.
>
>What do you think of as a 'wide' processor? If you are thinking of something like
>a GPU, which has >100 parallel ALUs, then I'd totally agree. If you were thinking
>of something more like an 8 issue CPU, I'm not sure I'd agree.

Depends on the micro-architecture of the processor.

The micro-architecture of the execution pipelines in a P6 style processor is quite simple so I can see why you don't agree.

However, a few years ago I built the forwarding on a dual-issue in-order superscalar processor with multiple stages in its execution pipelines. The forwarding was, lets say, challenging to get right both in terms of timing and routability. If we had gone triple-issue or more I reckon a mental breakdown would have been on the cards!

The micro-architecture of this particular processor made the right decisions as a whole it is just that one of the side effects was a complex forwarding system.

Therefore I would say that designing an architecture that explicitly requires forwarding to achieve good performance may not be the best idea as it would constrain the sorts of micro-architectures that could efficiently implement the architecture.


>>Also, designing a micro-architecture that relies on >forwarding operands from multiple
>>execution resources to all other execution resources is >not going to particularly
>>power efficient as wire power is so high.
>
>Absolutely, this is the classic shared nothing versus shared everything argument.
>
>Shared everything is always easier to program.
>Shared nothing is always higher performance/cheaper/lower power.
>
>CPUs fall into the former category, GPUs into the latter. However, for the right
>sort of workloads the disadvantages of the GPU's shared nothing architecture are mitigated.

Agree.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Intel AVX kills AMD SSE5Agner2008/06/17 08:14 AM
  Intel AVX kills AMD SSE5a reader2008/06/17 09:03 AM
  Bulldozer?David Kanter2008/06/19 04:23 PM
    Bulldozer?EduardoS2008/06/19 06:11 PM
    Bulldozer?Max2008/06/19 06:16 PM
      Bulldozer?Goose2008/06/21 02:23 AM
        Bulldozer?David Kanter2008/06/21 07:37 AM
          Bulldozer?someone2008/06/21 07:55 AM
            Bulldozer?David Kanter2008/06/21 08:07 AM
              Bulldozer?S. Rao2008/06/21 11:08 AM
                RegfilesPeter2008/06/21 11:49 AM
                Bulldozer?Linus Torvalds2008/06/21 12:23 PM
                  Bulldozer?S. Rao2008/06/21 04:50 PM
                  unified physical register file nullifies x86 advantageMichael S2008/06/22 12:24 AM
                    unified physical register file nullifies x86 advantageDavid Kanter2008/06/22 09:35 AM
                      unified physical register file nullifies x86 advantagehobold2008/06/22 01:03 PM
                    Reg file vs. forwarding networkDavid Kanter2008/06/22 10:36 AM
                      Reg file vs. forwarding networkhobold2008/06/22 12:39 PM
                        Reg file vs. forwarding networkPeter2008/06/22 02:48 PM
                          Reg file vs. forwarding networkDavid Kanter2008/06/22 08:54 PM
                            Reg file vs. forwarding networkPeter2008/06/23 03:44 AM
                              Reg file vs. forwarding networksavantu2008/06/23 04:41 AM
                                Reg file vs. forwarding networkPeter2008/06/23 07:35 AM
                        Reg file vs. forwarding networkAnders Jensen2008/06/23 11:05 AM
                        Reg file vs. forwarding networkleft nutz2008/06/27 07:31 AM
  Intel AVX kills AMD SSE5nobat2008/06/21 11:23 AM
    Intel AVX kills AMD SSE5Agner2008/06/21 10:01 PM
      So...Dean Kent2008/06/22 07:35 AM
  SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.mpx2008/06/22 12:25 AM
    SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.Michael S2008/06/22 01:42 AM
      SSE5 has a great chance for fiascoAgner2008/06/22 03:32 AM
        SSE5 has a great chance for fiascoIan Ameline2008/06/22 08:37 AM
        SSE5 has a great chance for fiascoanonymous2008/06/22 09:02 AM
          SSE5 has a great chance for fiascohobold2008/06/22 12:59 PM
            SSE5 has a great chance for fiascoHoward Chu2008/06/22 04:38 PM
      SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.hobold2008/06/22 12:52 PM
        SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.Michael S2008/06/22 01:46 PM
          SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.Hannes2008/06/24 08:49 AM
            SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.anonymous2008/06/24 10:46 AM
          SSE5 has a great chance to succeed.Ian Ollmann2008/06/24 10:12 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell tangerine? 🍊