By: Howard Chu (hyc.delete@this.symas.com), September 9, 2008 9:42 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) on 9/9/08 wrote:
---------------------------
>No, there's a much easier way to do that: just don't expose
>all of the flash as addressable - keeping a certain amount
>for private use.
Ah right. Absolutely right.
>So look at that 80GB drive (caveat: I'm going to get one,
>but I don't have one yet), and I will bet you that it's
>something like 10 8GB chips (or 20 4GB ones - I don't know
>what current flash chip capacities are and am too damn
>lazy to even look it up) - and the chips themselves are
>"power-of-two-gigabyte", but the final end result is the
>disk "power-of-ten gigabyte".
There are 20 4GB chips.
And yeah, just like the OCZ Core V2 128GB drive is now marketed as a 120GB drive.
>Do the math. The difference between a "Gibibyte" and a
>gigabyte is about 7%. The end result is that you actually
>have 5+GB of free space at all time! And that is how
>you do wear levelling and remapping and how you erase
>blocks in advance.
>
>So I would bet that of that hidden space, one part of it
>is for "fragmentation" (ie because you have remapped parts
>of an erase block), one part of it is for actually keeping
>track of the remapping information itself, and one part
>of it is "pre-erased blocks". And there's probably a few
>"bad blocks" there too.
Yes. Also there's apparently an ATA command you can issue to set the number of addressable sectors; you can decrease it if you want to reserve more space for remapping. (I dunno if you can increase it and steal back the reserved space. You probably wouldn't want to...)
>So the actual RAM buffer on the card is purely to keep any
>temporary working results - there's probably a fairly
>shallow cache there (a couple of flash blocks worth of data)
>but there's also all the working memory for the flash
>controller itself (ie the more complex data structures to
>actually keep track of all the remapping information). So
>there's no need for a lot of data on that RAM thing,
>the flash itself is fast enough for that. You'd mainly just
>have metadata there and the few blocks of WB cache.
The flash is only fast enough if everything else in the block management was done correctly; i.e., all incoming writes always mapped to sequential writes. It's obvious in the OCZ/Jmicron controller that this isn't the case.
>But I have no actual insider information. All of the above
>is based on just "that's how I'd do it, knowing how flash
>file systems work".
---------------------------
>No, there's a much easier way to do that: just don't expose
>all of the flash as addressable - keeping a certain amount
>for private use.
Ah right. Absolutely right.
>So look at that 80GB drive (caveat: I'm going to get one,
>but I don't have one yet), and I will bet you that it's
>something like 10 8GB chips (or 20 4GB ones - I don't know
>what current flash chip capacities are and am too damn
>lazy to even look it up) - and the chips themselves are
>"power-of-two-gigabyte", but the final end result is the
>disk "power-of-ten gigabyte".
There are 20 4GB chips.
And yeah, just like the OCZ Core V2 128GB drive is now marketed as a 120GB drive.
>Do the math. The difference between a "Gibibyte" and a
>gigabyte is about 7%. The end result is that you actually
>have 5+GB of free space at all time! And that is how
>you do wear levelling and remapping and how you erase
>blocks in advance.
>
>So I would bet that of that hidden space, one part of it
>is for "fragmentation" (ie because you have remapped parts
>of an erase block), one part of it is for actually keeping
>track of the remapping information itself, and one part
>of it is "pre-erased blocks". And there's probably a few
>"bad blocks" there too.
Yes. Also there's apparently an ATA command you can issue to set the number of addressable sectors; you can decrease it if you want to reserve more space for remapping. (I dunno if you can increase it and steal back the reserved space. You probably wouldn't want to...)
>So the actual RAM buffer on the card is purely to keep any
>temporary working results - there's probably a fairly
>shallow cache there (a couple of flash blocks worth of data)
>but there's also all the working memory for the flash
>controller itself (ie the more complex data structures to
>actually keep track of all the remapping information). So
>there's no need for a lot of data on that RAM thing,
>the flash itself is fast enough for that. You'd mainly just
>have metadata there and the few blocks of WB cache.
The flash is only fast enough if everything else in the block management was done correctly; i.e., all incoming writes always mapped to sequential writes. It's obvious in the OCZ/Jmicron controller that this isn't the case.
>But I have no actual insider information. All of the above
>is based on just "that's how I'd do it, knowing how flash
>file systems work".
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
First Dunnington benchmark results | Michael S | 2008/08/19 10:54 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | rwessel | 2008/08/19 01:42 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Aaron Apink | 2008/08/19 05:49 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Joe Chang | 2008/08/19 06:28 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | rwessel | 2008/08/21 09:49 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Joe Chang | 2008/08/21 03:10 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | rwessel | 2008/08/21 06:42 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Joe Chang | 2008/08/21 07:12 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | rwessel | 2008/08/21 09:45 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/21 01:12 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Joe Chang | 2008/08/21 03:15 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Richard Cownie | 2008/08/20 02:59 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Anders Jensen | 2008/08/20 03:26 AM |
+SSD | Anders Jensen | 2008/08/20 03:30 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Richard Cownie | 2008/08/20 11:04 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | slacker | 2008/08/20 12:35 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Doug Siebert | 2008/08/20 07:54 PM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Richard Cownie | 2008/08/20 08:58 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | David Kanter | 2008/08/21 01:16 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Matt Sayler | 2008/08/21 06:25 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Richard Cownie | 2008/08/21 06:32 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/08/21 08:39 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/08/21 09:07 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/08/21 09:52 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/08/21 10:35 AM |
OLTP appliance = mainframe? (NT) | Potatoswatter | 2008/08/21 11:44 AM |
OLTP appliance = HP NonStop? | Michael S | 2008/08/21 12:03 PM |
OLTP appliance | Joe Chang | 2008/08/21 03:33 PM |
OLTP appliance | Potatoswatter | 2008/08/21 03:59 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/21 01:29 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Dan Downs | 2008/08/21 11:33 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | rwessel | 2008/08/21 12:45 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Dan Downs | 2008/08/22 08:21 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/21 01:34 PM |
SLC vs. MLC vs DRAM | pgerassi | 2008/08/21 12:24 PM |
SLC vs. MLC vs DRAM | David Kanter | 2008/08/22 01:31 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Groo | 2008/08/23 12:52 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Doug Siebert | 2008/08/21 06:14 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/08/22 08:05 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Doug Siebert | 2008/08/22 02:27 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | EduardoS | 2008/08/22 06:26 PM |
SSD Controller differentiation | David Kanter | 2008/08/22 09:35 PM |
SSD Controller differentiation | Doug Siebert | 2008/08/22 10:34 PM |
SSD Controller differentiation (supercaps, cost...) | anon | 2008/08/23 10:18 AM |
SSD Controller differentiation (supercaps, cost...) | Doug Siebert | 2008/08/23 10:40 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/08/23 10:50 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/08 12:03 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Max | 2008/09/08 01:51 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Howard Chu | 2008/09/08 09:04 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Max | 2008/09/08 10:29 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Howard Chu | 2008/09/09 12:12 AM |
RAM vs SSD? | Jouni Osmala | 2008/09/09 01:06 AM |
RAM vs SSD? | Max | 2008/09/12 12:51 PM |
RAM vs SSD? | EduardoS | 2008/09/12 04:27 PM |
Disk cache snapshotting | Max | 2008/09/13 08:34 AM |
Disk cache snapshotting | Howard Chu | 2008/09/14 09:58 PM |
Disk cache snapshotting | Max | 2008/09/15 12:50 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/09 07:43 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Howard Chu | 2008/09/09 09:42 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/09 10:39 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/09/10 12:29 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | anon | 2008/09/10 02:51 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/09/10 03:09 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Max | 2008/09/10 04:48 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/09/10 05:52 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Max | 2008/09/10 06:28 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Matt Sayler | 2008/09/10 06:21 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/09/10 09:17 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | anon | 2008/09/10 06:29 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/09/10 09:23 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Matt Sayler | 2008/09/10 10:45 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/10 07:25 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michael S | 2008/09/10 09:54 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/10 10:31 AM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Max | 2008/09/11 07:35 AM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/11 09:06 AM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/11 09:48 AM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/11 11:39 AM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Mark Roulo | 2008/09/11 12:18 PM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Doug Siebert | 2008/09/11 05:59 PM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/11 07:16 PM |
Physical vs effective write latency | Doug Siebert | 2008/09/11 10:28 PM |
Physical vs effective write latency | MS | 2009/02/03 03:06 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Anonymous | 2008/09/11 12:39 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | anon | 2008/09/11 01:17 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Anonymous | 2008/09/11 05:25 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Doug Siebert | 2008/09/11 05:47 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | rwessel | 2008/09/11 06:01 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | anon | 2008/09/12 12:00 AM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Anonymous | 2008/09/12 08:52 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | anon | 2008/09/13 10:06 AM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Ungo | 2008/09/15 12:18 PM |
To SSD or not? One lady's perspective | David Kanter | 2008/09/22 01:12 AM |
To SSD or not? One lady's perspective | Howard Chu | 2008/09/22 04:02 AM |
To SSD or not? Real data.. | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/22 07:33 AM |
To SSD or not? Real data.. | Ungo | 2008/09/22 12:27 PM |
4K sectors | Wes Felter | 2008/09/22 06:03 PM |
4K sectors | Daniel | 2008/09/22 10:31 PM |
Reasons for >512 byte sectors | Doug Siebert | 2008/09/22 09:38 PM |
Reasons for >512 byte sectors | rwessel | 2008/09/22 10:09 PM |
Reasons for >512 byte sectors | Howard Chu | 2008/09/23 02:50 AM |
Reasons for >512 byte sectors | Daniel | 2008/09/22 10:40 PM |
Reasons for >512 byte sectors | rwessel | 2008/09/23 09:11 AM |
Reasons for >512 byte sectors | Daniel | 2008/09/23 12:10 PM |
HDD long sector size availability | Etienne Lehnart | 2008/09/23 05:32 AM |
HDD long sector size availability | rwessel | 2008/09/23 09:19 AM |
HDD long sector size availability | Etienne Lehnart | 2008/09/23 02:17 PM |
To SSD or not? Real data.. | Jouni Osmala | 2008/09/22 11:16 PM |
To SSD or not? One lady's perspective | Wes Felter | 2008/09/22 11:25 AM |
How should SSDs be engineered into systems? | Rob Thorpe | 2008/09/22 02:01 PM |
How should SSDs be engineered into systems? | Matt Craighead | 2008/09/23 06:59 PM |
How should SSDs be engineered into systems? | Matt Sayler | 2008/09/24 04:17 AM |
ATA/SCSIS, Write Flushes and Asych Filesystems | TruePath | 2009/01/25 04:44 AM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Michael S | 2008/09/12 04:58 AM |
overlapped erase and read | Michael S | 2008/09/12 04:59 AM |
overlapped erase and read | David W. Hess | 2008/09/12 09:56 AM |
overlapped erase and read | Anonymous | 2008/09/12 08:45 PM |
overlapped erase and read | Jouni Osmala | 2008/09/12 11:56 PM |
overlapped erase and read | Michael S | 2008/09/13 11:29 AM |
overlapped erase and read | Michael S | 2008/09/13 12:09 PM |
overlapped erase and read | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/13 02:05 PM |
SLC vs. MLC - the trick to latency | Doug Siebert | 2008/09/11 05:31 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | EduardoS | 2008/09/08 02:07 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2008/09/08 02:30 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | EduardoS | 2008/09/08 04:01 PM |
SSD and RAID | Joe Chang | 2008/09/08 07:42 PM |
SSD and RAID | Doug Siebert | 2008/09/08 09:46 PM |
SSD and RAID | Aaron Spink | 2008/09/09 04:27 PM |
SSD and RAID | Groo | 2008/09/10 01:02 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Joern Engel | 2009/01/06 10:22 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/06 02:04 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Joern Engel | 2009/01/06 03:24 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | rwessel | 2009/01/06 04:47 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | anonymous | 2009/01/06 05:17 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | rwessel | 2009/01/06 05:58 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Joern Engel | 2009/01/07 12:35 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/06 05:45 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | rwessel | 2009/01/06 06:09 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/06 07:47 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Joern Engel | 2009/01/07 12:26 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | anon | 2009/01/06 08:23 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Joern Engel | 2009/01/07 12:52 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | anon | 2009/01/07 02:34 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | IntelUser2000 | 2009/01/07 07:43 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/07 10:28 AM |
drop data filesystem semantic | Doug Siebert | 2009/01/09 12:21 PM |
FTL and FS | iz | 2009/01/09 07:49 PM |
FTL and FS | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/09 09:53 PM |
FTL and FS | iz | 2009/01/10 02:09 AM |
FTL and FS | Michael S | 2009/01/10 03:19 PM |
compiling large programs | iz | 2009/01/10 05:51 PM |
compiling large programs | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/10 07:58 PM |
compiling large programs | peter | 2009/01/11 05:30 AM |
compiling large programs | Andi Kleen | 2009/01/11 01:03 PM |
The File Abstraction | TruePath | 2009/01/25 06:45 AM |
The File Abstraction | Howard Chu | 2009/01/25 01:49 PM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/26 09:23 AM |
The File Abstraction | Michael S | 2009/01/26 01:39 PM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/26 02:31 PM |
The File Abstraction | Dean Kent | 2009/01/26 03:06 PM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/26 04:29 PM |
The File Abstraction | Mark Christiansen | 2009/01/27 09:24 AM |
The File Abstraction | Mark Christiansen | 2009/01/27 10:14 AM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/27 10:15 AM |
The File Abstraction | slacker | 2009/01/27 11:20 AM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/27 01:16 PM |
Attributes All The Way Down | Mark Christiansen | 2009/01/27 02:17 PM |
The File Abstraction | slacker | 2009/01/27 05:25 PM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/28 08:17 AM |
The File Abstraction: API thoughts | Carlie Coats | 2009/01/28 09:35 AM |
The File Abstraction | slacker | 2009/01/28 10:09 AM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/28 01:44 PM |
Programs already 'hide' their metadata in the bytestream, unbeknownst to users | anon | 2009/01/28 09:28 PM |
The File Abstraction | slacker | 2009/01/29 10:39 AM |
The File Abstraction | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/29 11:08 AM |
The File Abstraction | Dean Kent | 2009/01/29 11:49 AM |
The File Abstraction | Howard Chu | 2009/01/29 02:58 PM |
The File Abstraction | rwessel | 2009/01/29 04:23 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | slacker | 2009/01/29 03:05 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | stubar | 2009/01/29 04:49 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/29 05:15 PM |
Like Duh | anon | 2009/01/29 07:42 PM |
Like Duh | anon | 2009/01/29 09:15 PM |
Like Duh | anon | 2009/02/01 07:18 PM |
Double Duh. | Anonymous | 2009/02/01 10:58 PM |
Double Duh. | anon | 2009/02/02 02:08 AM |
Double Duh. | Anonymous | 2009/02/02 05:11 PM |
Double Duh. | anon | 2009/02/02 07:33 PM |
Like Duh | David Kanter | 2009/02/01 11:05 PM |
Like Duh | peter | 2009/02/01 11:55 PM |
Like Duh | anon | 2009/02/02 01:55 AM |
Xattrs, Solar power, regulation and politics | Rob Thorpe | 2009/02/02 04:36 AM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | hobold | 2009/02/02 06:14 AM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | rwessel | 2009/02/02 12:33 PM |
good summary | Michael S | 2009/02/03 02:41 AM |
good summary | Mark Christiansen | 2009/02/03 09:57 AM |
good summary | Howard Chu | 2009/02/03 10:21 AM |
good summary | Mark Christiansen | 2009/02/03 11:18 AM |
good summary | Howard Chu | 2009/02/03 12:00 PM |
good summary | Mark Christiansen | 2009/02/03 12:36 PM |
good summary | RagingDragon | 2009/02/03 10:39 PM |
good summary | rwessel | 2009/02/03 11:03 PM |
good summary | RagingDragon | 2009/02/03 11:46 PM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | slacker | 2009/02/04 05:06 PM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | Michael S | 2009/02/05 01:05 AM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | Ungo | 2009/02/05 01:15 PM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | slacker | 2009/02/05 02:19 PM |
Terminology seems too fuzzy to me | Howard Chu | 2009/02/05 04:44 PM |
Like Duh | iz | 2009/01/30 02:03 AM |
EAs (security labels) hosed me badly | anon | 2009/01/30 09:48 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | RagingDragon | 2009/01/29 09:31 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | anonymous | 2009/01/29 08:13 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Howard Chu | 2009/01/29 09:38 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | slacker | 2009/01/30 11:24 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | anon | 2009/01/30 05:50 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Etienne Lehnart | 2009/01/30 12:22 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Rob Thorpe | 2009/01/30 12:39 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | slacker | 2009/01/30 01:16 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | anon | 2009/01/30 06:03 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Howard Chu | 2009/01/30 11:22 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | rwessel | 2009/01/31 12:08 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | anonymous | 2009/01/31 12:22 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | rwessel | 2009/01/31 12:56 AM |
Scaling | Dean Kent | 2009/01/31 09:04 AM |
Scaling | Rob Thorpe | 2009/02/02 02:39 AM |
Scaling | rwessel | 2009/02/02 11:41 AM |
Scaling | Howard Chu | 2009/02/02 12:30 PM |
Scaling | Dean Kent | 2009/02/02 02:27 PM |
Scaling | Rob Thorpe | 2009/02/03 05:08 AM |
Scaling | Dean Kent | 2009/02/03 07:38 AM |
Scaling | rwessel | 2009/02/03 02:34 PM |
Scaling | RagingDragon | 2009/02/03 10:46 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Matt Sayler | 2009/02/03 11:27 AM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Howard Chu | 2009/02/03 12:03 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Matt Sayler | 2009/02/03 12:17 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | RagingDragon | 2009/02/03 11:00 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Michael S | 2009/02/04 06:46 AM |
in defense of software that does not scale | RagingDragon | 2009/02/04 09:33 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Dean Kent | 2009/02/03 12:17 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Matt Sayler | 2009/02/03 12:24 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Vincent Diepeveen | 2009/02/04 10:43 AM |
in defense of software that does not scale | rwessel | 2009/02/03 02:44 PM |
in defense of software that does not scale | anon | 2009/02/04 02:35 AM |
in defense of software that does not scale | Carlie Coats | 2009/02/04 05:24 AM |
Scaling with time vs. scaling from the beginning. | mpx | 2009/02/05 01:57 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Michael S | 2009/01/31 10:33 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | anon | 2009/01/31 10:37 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | JasonB | 2009/01/31 08:11 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Howard Chu | 2009/01/31 11:43 AM |
Extended Attributes in Action | JasonB | 2009/01/31 04:37 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Howard Chu | 2009/02/02 02:42 PM |
Extended Attributes in Action | Howard Chu | 2009/02/02 02:44 PM |
The File Abstraction | Rob Thorpe | 2009/01/27 11:20 AM |
The File Abstraction | Howard Chu | 2009/01/27 12:28 AM |
The File Abstraction | Michael S | 2009/01/27 03:00 AM |
The File Abstraction | Dean Kent | 2009/01/27 08:30 AM |
The File Abstraction | Andi Kleen | 2009/01/27 02:05 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Michel | 2009/01/12 06:54 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/01/12 07:38 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | rwessel | 2009/01/13 12:52 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Ungo | 2009/01/13 03:04 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Wes Felter | 2009/01/13 05:42 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | TruePath | 2009/01/25 05:05 AM |
SLC vs. MLC | Ungo | 2008/08/21 12:54 PM |
SLC vs. MLC | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/21 01:20 PM |
MLC vs. SLC | Michael S | 2008/08/21 08:57 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | rwessel | 2008/08/21 10:40 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/21 03:18 AM |
First Dunnington benchmark results | Etienne Lehnart | 2008/08/20 04:38 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Tom W | 2008/08/19 10:10 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Jesper Frimann | 2008/08/20 12:28 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Tom W | 2008/08/20 03:42 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | David Kanter | 2008/08/21 01:13 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Joe Chang | 2008/08/21 06:54 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | asdf | 2008/08/22 01:18 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Dean Kent | 2008/08/22 07:54 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Jesper Frimann | 2008/08/22 09:48 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Tom W | 2008/08/24 01:06 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Michael S | 2008/08/24 04:19 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Dean Kent | 2008/08/24 09:30 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Paul | 2008/08/24 11:16 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Dean Kent | 2008/08/24 12:37 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Michael S | 2008/08/25 12:53 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | someone | 2008/08/22 10:19 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | aaron spink | 2008/08/23 02:56 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Michael S | 2008/08/23 09:58 AM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | someone | 2008/08/23 01:51 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | someone | 2008/08/23 01:55 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/23 04:52 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | anonymous | 2008/08/23 05:28 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Dean Kent | 2008/08/23 06:12 PM |
Off road and topic | EduardoS | 2008/08/23 06:28 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | someone | 2008/08/23 06:26 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | Dean Kent | 2008/08/23 09:40 PM |
Will x86 dominate big iron? | anonymous | 2008/08/24 01:46 AM |
Off road and topic | David W. Hess | 2008/08/24 03:24 AM |
Off road and topic | Aaron Spink | 2008/08/24 04:14 AM |
Beckton vs. Dunnington | Mr. Camel | 2008/08/22 06:30 AM |
Beckton vs. Dunnington | jokerman | 2008/08/22 12:12 PM |
Beckton vs. Dunnington | Mr. Camel | 2009/05/29 10:16 AM |