By: David Kanter (dkanter.delete@this.realworldtech.com), October 30, 2008 12:00 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
James (alan@devonex.webhop.org) on 10/29/08 wrote:
---------------------------
>First quibble:
>
>> The next step was to collect the actual event-based
>> sampling data with a 1MHz resolution (sampling every 1ms).
>
>Wouldn't 1 ms lead to a 1 kHz resolution? For 1 MHz, you'd want a sample >every 1 microsecond (µs).
Yup, that was a mistake that made it past the proof-reading : (
That's the problem with having smart readers - they notice all your mistakes!
Of course, that's the best way to learn as well.
David
---------------------------
>First quibble:
>
>> The next step was to collect the actual event-based
>> sampling data with a 1MHz resolution (sampling every 1ms).
>
>Wouldn't 1 ms lead to a 1 kHz resolution? For 1 MHz, you'd want a sample >every 1 microsecond (µs).
Yup, that was a mistake that made it past the proof-reading : (
That's the problem with having smart readers - they notice all your mistakes!
Of course, that's the best way to learn as well.
David