SPECjbb and SPECpower

By: Henrik S (henrik.stahl.delete@this.nospam.oracle.nothanks.com), March 30, 2009 10:20 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
SPECjbb2005

2S/8C/16T Nehalem 2.93 GHz - 549197 bops @ 2 JVMs
http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2009q1/jbb2005-20090310-00671.html

2-socket systems for comparison
2S/8C Shanghai 2.8 GHz - 383020 bops @ 2 JVMs
http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2009q1/jbb2005-20081218-00567.html
or
2S/8C Harpertown 3.33 GHz - 368034 bops @ 2 JVMs
http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2009q1/jbb2005-20090220-00582.html

4-socket systems
4S/16C Shanghai 2.7 GHz - 721843 bops @ 4 JVMs
http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2008q4/jbb2005-20081112-00559.html
4S/24C Dunnington 2.67 GHz - 633897 bops @ 4 JVMs
http://www.spec.org/jbb2005/results/res2009q1/jbb2005-20090305-00663.html


and SPECpower_ssj2008
2S/8C/16T Nehalem 2.93 GHz, etc - 1746 ssj_ops/watt
http://www.spec.org/power_ssj2008/results/res2009q1/power_ssj2008-20090310-00129.html

which outperforms everything else in ops/watt, even LV versions of earlier generations.

(Full details in the links)
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadMichael S2009/03/30 09:52 AM
  SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 10:20 AM
    SPECjbb and SPECpoweranon2009/03/30 10:41 AM
      SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 11:12 AM
  Nehalem 2S Jbb2005 result - lower than 4S ShanghaiMichael S2009/03/30 10:43 AM
    3S Jbb2005 result, for funEduardoS2009/03/30 03:04 PM
      3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/30 03:42 PM
        3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 03:15 AM
          3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/31 10:12 AM
            3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 11:00 AM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadLinus Torvalds2009/03/30 01:58 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadPaul2009/03/30 03:40 PM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadhpc guy2009/03/30 04:46 PM
        Nehalem SPECint/fpDavid Kanter2009/03/30 05:04 PM
  TPC-CMichael S2009/03/30 03:20 PM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/30 11:12 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadanonymous2009/03/31 08:16 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadWes Felter2009/03/31 11:28 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/31 10:36 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?