3S Jbb2005 result, for fun

By: EduardoS (no.delete@this.spam.com), March 30, 2009 3:04 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Michael S (already5chosen@yahoo.com) on 3/30/09 wrote:
>Dell PowerEdge M710, 2S/8C/16T, Intel Xeon X5570, 2.93GHz, 24 GB, Ws2008 EE, Oracle
>JRockit(R) 6 P28.0.0, 2 JVMs - 549,197 BOPs

IBM Corporation IBM System x3755, 3S/12C/12T, AMD Opteron 8384, 2.7GHz, 48GB, Ws2008 EE, IBM J9 2.4 JRE 1.6.0 - 546564 BOPs


Due to the high premium OEMs are charging for Nehalem CPUs and DDR3 this IBM server have similar costs (better with 2.4GHz CPUs and a lot of memory), an interesting competition...
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadMichael S2009/03/30 09:52 AM
  SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 10:20 AM
    SPECjbb and SPECpoweranon2009/03/30 10:41 AM
      SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 11:12 AM
  Nehalem 2S Jbb2005 result - lower than 4S ShanghaiMichael S2009/03/30 10:43 AM
    3S Jbb2005 result, for funEduardoS2009/03/30 03:04 PM
      3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/30 03:42 PM
        3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 03:15 AM
          3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/31 10:12 AM
            3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 11:00 AM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadLinus Torvalds2009/03/30 01:58 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadPaul2009/03/30 03:40 PM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadhpc guy2009/03/30 04:46 PM
        Nehalem SPECint/fpDavid Kanter2009/03/30 05:04 PM
  TPC-CMichael S2009/03/30 03:20 PM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/30 11:12 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadanonymous2009/03/31 08:16 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadWes Felter2009/03/31 11:28 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/31 10:36 PM
Reply to this Topic
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?