Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is dead

By: hpc guy (no.delete@this.thanks.edu), March 30, 2009 4:46 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
Paul (no@thanks.com) on 3/30/09 wrote:
---------------------------
>Linus Torvalds (torvalds@linux-foundation.org) on 3/30/09 wrote:
>---------------------------
>>But other workloads won't get as much SMT improvement, and
>>will prefer 4S for extra memory bandwidth and full cores.
>
>And of course there is always the set of people who just need more DIMM sockets
>and are going from 2 to 4 sockets not because they need the CPU performance or even
>memory bandwidth but because they need the extra memory controllers.
>
>Although I see that MetaRAM now do a 16GB DIMM, does that mean you can put 288GB
>in one of those 18 socket SuperMicro boards now? So a 4S Beckton-EX box could potentially
>do 576GB? Presumably that's why they increased the number of physical address lines
>to 44 as 40 was likely to not be enough during the life of the product.
>

Does anyone has the cint_rate and cfp_rate numbers?

There're many moving parts in the server benchmarks.
Some raw speccpu numbers would be really appreciated.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadMichael S2009/03/30 09:52 AM
  SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 10:20 AM
    SPECjbb and SPECpoweranon2009/03/30 10:41 AM
      SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 11:12 AM
  Nehalem 2S Jbb2005 result - lower than 4S ShanghaiMichael S2009/03/30 10:43 AM
    3S Jbb2005 result, for funEduardoS2009/03/30 03:04 PM
      3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/30 03:42 PM
        3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 03:15 AM
          3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/31 10:12 AM
            3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 11:00 AM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadLinus Torvalds2009/03/30 01:58 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadPaul2009/03/30 03:40 PM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadhpc guy2009/03/30 04:46 PM
        Nehalem SPECint/fpDavid Kanter2009/03/30 05:04 PM
  TPC-CMichael S2009/03/30 03:20 PM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/30 11:12 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadanonymous2009/03/31 08:16 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadWes Felter2009/03/31 11:28 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/31 10:36 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?