Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is dead

By: Anders Jensen (.delete@this..), March 30, 2009 11:12 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
4S Nehalem should have a fair chance against 2S 12C 32nm Westmere due to FBD memory interface. DDR3 has a real bandwidth*capacity issue for servers.

http://www.supermicro.com/xeon_5500/files/xeon5500/DDR3_Memory_Preview_960x720.jpg
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadMichael S2009/03/30 09:52 AM
  SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 10:20 AM
    SPECjbb and SPECpoweranon2009/03/30 10:41 AM
      SPECjbb and SPECpowerHenrik S2009/03/30 11:12 AM
  Nehalem 2S Jbb2005 result - lower than 4S ShanghaiMichael S2009/03/30 10:43 AM
    3S Jbb2005 result, for funEduardoS2009/03/30 03:04 PM
      3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/30 03:42 PM
        3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 03:15 AM
          3S Jbb2005 result, for funMichael S2009/03/31 10:12 AM
            3S Jbb2005 result, for funmpx2009/03/31 11:00 AM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadLinus Torvalds2009/03/30 01:58 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadPaul2009/03/30 03:40 PM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadhpc guy2009/03/30 04:46 PM
        Nehalem SPECint/fpDavid Kanter2009/03/30 05:04 PM
  TPC-CMichael S2009/03/30 03:20 PM
  Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/30 11:12 PM
    Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadanonymous2009/03/31 08:16 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadWes Felter2009/03/31 11:28 AM
      Nehalem TPC-E results - 4S x86 is deadAnders Jensen2009/03/31 10:36 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?