By: Wes Felter (wesley.delete@this.felter.org), March 31, 2009 11:28 am
Room: Moderated Discussions
anonymous (no@spam.com) on 3/31/09 wrote:
---------------------------
>>4S Nehalem should have a fair chance against 2S 12C 32nm Westmere due to FBD memory
>>interface. DDR3 has a real bandwidth*capacity issue for servers.
>
>You do know that Beckton will connect to Millbrook chips
>which in turn will connect to DDR3 DIMMs, right?
That solves the problem. In many cases you could run a Beckton system with one DIMM per channel (8 DIMMs per socket) and thus you'd get the full 1333MHz, while a Gainestown/Westmere system would need three DIMMs per channel at 800MHz to get similar capacity.
---------------------------
>>4S Nehalem should have a fair chance against 2S 12C 32nm Westmere due to FBD memory
>>interface. DDR3 has a real bandwidth*capacity issue for servers.
>
>You do know that Beckton will connect to Millbrook chips
>which in turn will connect to DDR3 DIMMs, right?
That solves the problem. In many cases you could run a Beckton system with one DIMM per channel (8 DIMMs per socket) and thus you'd get the full 1333MHz, while a Gainestown/Westmere system would need three DIMMs per channel at 800MHz to get similar capacity.