Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 online

Article: Process Technology at IEDM 2008
By: William Campbell (no.delete@this.spam.com), August 3, 2009 5:37 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
David Kanter (dkanter@realworldtech.com) on 8/3/09 wrote:
---------------------------
>Welcome back from an excellent weekend! To cheer up your Monday morning, I have
>completed a new article that reviews and analyzes the process technologies presented at IEDM 2008 and VLSI 2009:
>
>http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT072109003617
>

Thank you David, for providing an accessible, condensed overview.

There has been a lot of talk over the years about Intel being a process generation or more ahead of their competitors, but particularly looking at the Figure 17 – High Performance, Voltage Adjusted, Transistor Drive Strength at 100nA/um Ioff, and if you ignore SRAM/logic density, an it be said that Intel is at least two process generations ahead of everybody else? It seems that IBMs current gen (performance oriented—45nm) process is only marginally better than Intel's previous gen process (65nm). And that pattern seems, set to continue, and historically consistent.
< Previous Post in ThreadNext Post in Thread >
TopicPosted ByDate
Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineDavid Kanter2009/08/03 01:22 AM
  Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineHans de Vries2009/08/03 02:28 AM
    Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineDavid Kanter2009/08/03 02:47 PM
      Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineHans de Vries2009/08/03 04:51 PM
        Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineDavid Kanter2009/08/03 10:09 PM
          Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineHans de Vries2009/08/04 11:56 AM
            Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineHans de Vries2009/08/04 12:31 PM
        Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineslacker2009/08/04 10:37 AM
          Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineAlexander Tomkins2009/08/04 11:36 AM
            Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineslacker2009/08/04 03:10 PM
              Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineAlexander Tomkins2009/08/04 07:12 PM
        Thanks for spotting thatDavid Kanter2009/08/05 01:30 AM
  Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlinea reader2009/08/03 09:57 AM
    Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineAlexander Tomkins2009/08/04 11:30 AM
    smaller but better I_on/I_offMoritz2009/08/09 03:20 AM
      smaller but better I_on/I_offDavid Kanter2009/08/09 10:15 AM
  Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineWilliam Campbell2009/08/03 05:37 PM
  Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineBryan Catanzaro2009/08/04 07:04 AM
  Intel 32 nm PMOSjokerman2009/08/04 12:09 PM
    Intel 32 nm PMOSDavid Kanter2009/08/04 12:57 PM
    Good eyeDavid Kanter2009/08/05 01:30 AM
  TSMC 28nm: major changes?One Anonymous2009/08/05 01:31 AM
    TSMC 28nm: major changes?David Kanter2009/08/05 02:34 AM
      TSMC 28nm: major changes?anon2009/08/05 08:20 AM
        TSMC 28nm: major changes?David Kanter2009/08/05 12:04 PM
  Article on 32nm process tech from IEDM 08 and VLSI 09 onlineanon2009/08/07 01:48 PM
Reply to this Topic
Name:
Email:
Topic:
Body: No Text
How do you spell avocado?