Article: Hot Chips XXI Preview
By: Jukka Larja (roskakori2006.delete@this.gmail.com), October 10, 2009 9:50 pm
Room: Moderated Discussions
AM (myname4rwt@jee.male) on 10/10/09 wrote:
---------------------------
>Read:
>>Do I have exact sales figures? No, and I never claimed to, nor did I invent any.
>
>It's just amazing how quickly one can go from claiming which Atom bin sold most chips to denying it.
I have re-read that thread and as far as I can see, Ungo never claimed to have exact sales figures. Why do you think he did?
> You constantly fail to see the big
> picture and do relatively simple
> reasoning on your own. Think:
> compared to good sources written
> by the best minds, what a lecture
> by a local professor can possibly
> add to that?
I think I have already explained this quite well. It helps student get a grip and do some studying during longer period of time. It is also less than clear to me that there are some good sources easily available, but we can just agree to disagree about that. I don't think it's more than a minor point.
> Does he have a better and deeper
> understanding of the subject
> than people who did original
> research or designed a real
> product? Is he in position to
> answer questions to which the
> sources contain no answers?
A professor is supposed to do research himself. I'm not saying this is very relevant on basic courses, but it should at least motivate students more than just giving them a book to read. Whether that research is world class or not certainly factors in on more advanced courses.
> Don't get me wrong: there *are*
> people who dedicated themselves
> to education, and yet their
> expertise is hardly questioned
> by anyone (e.g. Don Knuth comes
> to mind), but such people are
> few and far between.
In engineering you are probably right. Large part (perhaps even most part) of research is done by or with private companies and independent research by a university is rare.
>> When it comes to expertise, the
>> professors are supposed to be
>> among the greatest experts in
>> the world, on their own field
>> of study. Not all (or most)
>> are, of course, but that's the
>> idea anyway. So they should be
>> able to bring something special
>> to the table.
>
> "Supposed", yes. *That's* the problem.
I think that for most fields, it isn't. And as far as basic courses go, good teaching skills are probably more important than top of the world expertise on subject matter.
> Besides, since you switched from
> discussing the topic to education,
> I would like to focus your
> attention on the following (from
> my last post before teaching):
Why are you doing this? You already "won", I "gave up".
> Actually, many things you write
> make me seriously wonder what
> your real purpose is. You say
> how easy it's to misunderstand,
> yet you write in a
> very-easy-to-misinterpret
> style;
I'm writing in foreign language about very abstract things. If we can change language to Finnish, I promise to do a lot better job. That may not be the only problem, but certainly a big one.
> you accuse me of "adding" something
> to your statements, yet when I bold
> out what you said (below), you are
> full of surprize etc. It just
> doesn't look like you're trying to
> resolve a misunderstanding or
> arrive at a meaningful answer to a
> question that bothers you.
You quoted me out of context. You took part of my text talking about the example I had set up and presented it as something I generally think is true. I was all surprised because I cannot fathom how you still at that point managed to miss the context of the example.
So I gave up. It doesn't matter whether I'm doing über bad job at writing or you reading. Were obviously not getting anywhere.
> If you honestly believe that your
> "big 3" is a meaningful mental
> exercise re. OoOE or a design
> feature in general, may I ask to
> what conclusions does it lead you?
There's no free lunch and everything affects everything. Although my point was actually to opposite direction.
> ... Please, do some explanation
> here in case I fail to see the
> great academic significance of
> this exercise.
I don't know whether you intent to insult here or what, but I don't like you twisting and exaggerating what I wrote. I'm quite sure I never said there was _great_ academic significance.
I might have accidentally implied academic significance, although that depends on what exactly academic means (for example, is something that may have significance on a basic university course considered academic just because it happens in university setting?). I'm pretty sure you can find a quotation to prove that.
> Well, I thought you were a fanboy of
> theory, so how about we come to some
> conclusion how his speaking from
> theoretical standpoint (acc. to you)
> is connected with real theory?
Hmm? I think Jouni (and others) made good points, even if there wasn't practical examples to demonstrate them.
By the way. I think you got that fanboy of theory thing I said wrong. It seems that most of the time you use the title I don't quite understand what you want.
> Well, you said that I tend to constantly
> interpret things as I want. You surely
> meant that my interpretation was wrong,
> correct? Hence the request to be
> fact-based.
It's not black and white. Interpreting your way is only wrong from the point of view that you may interpret differently than what the writer _thought_. If you just take the text and forget the thought behind it, there aren't wrong interpretations anymore, just different ones.
-JLarja
---------------------------
>Read:
>>Do I have exact sales figures? No, and I never claimed to, nor did I invent any.
>
>It's just amazing how quickly one can go from claiming which Atom bin sold most chips to denying it.
I have re-read that thread and as far as I can see, Ungo never claimed to have exact sales figures. Why do you think he did?
> You constantly fail to see the big
> picture and do relatively simple
> reasoning on your own. Think:
> compared to good sources written
> by the best minds, what a lecture
> by a local professor can possibly
> add to that?
I think I have already explained this quite well. It helps student get a grip and do some studying during longer period of time. It is also less than clear to me that there are some good sources easily available, but we can just agree to disagree about that. I don't think it's more than a minor point.
> Does he have a better and deeper
> understanding of the subject
> than people who did original
> research or designed a real
> product? Is he in position to
> answer questions to which the
> sources contain no answers?
A professor is supposed to do research himself. I'm not saying this is very relevant on basic courses, but it should at least motivate students more than just giving them a book to read. Whether that research is world class or not certainly factors in on more advanced courses.
> Don't get me wrong: there *are*
> people who dedicated themselves
> to education, and yet their
> expertise is hardly questioned
> by anyone (e.g. Don Knuth comes
> to mind), but such people are
> few and far between.
In engineering you are probably right. Large part (perhaps even most part) of research is done by or with private companies and independent research by a university is rare.
>> When it comes to expertise, the
>> professors are supposed to be
>> among the greatest experts in
>> the world, on their own field
>> of study. Not all (or most)
>> are, of course, but that's the
>> idea anyway. So they should be
>> able to bring something special
>> to the table.
>
> "Supposed", yes. *That's* the problem.
I think that for most fields, it isn't. And as far as basic courses go, good teaching skills are probably more important than top of the world expertise on subject matter.
> Besides, since you switched from
> discussing the topic to education,
> I would like to focus your
> attention on the following (from
> my last post before teaching):
Why are you doing this? You already "won", I "gave up".
> Actually, many things you write
> make me seriously wonder what
> your real purpose is. You say
> how easy it's to misunderstand,
> yet you write in a
> very-easy-to-misinterpret
> style;
I'm writing in foreign language about very abstract things. If we can change language to Finnish, I promise to do a lot better job. That may not be the only problem, but certainly a big one.
> you accuse me of "adding" something
> to your statements, yet when I bold
> out what you said (below), you are
> full of surprize etc. It just
> doesn't look like you're trying to
> resolve a misunderstanding or
> arrive at a meaningful answer to a
> question that bothers you.
You quoted me out of context. You took part of my text talking about the example I had set up and presented it as something I generally think is true. I was all surprised because I cannot fathom how you still at that point managed to miss the context of the example.
So I gave up. It doesn't matter whether I'm doing über bad job at writing or you reading. Were obviously not getting anywhere.
> If you honestly believe that your
> "big 3" is a meaningful mental
> exercise re. OoOE or a design
> feature in general, may I ask to
> what conclusions does it lead you?
There's no free lunch and everything affects everything. Although my point was actually to opposite direction.
> ... Please, do some explanation
> here in case I fail to see the
> great academic significance of
> this exercise.
I don't know whether you intent to insult here or what, but I don't like you twisting and exaggerating what I wrote. I'm quite sure I never said there was _great_ academic significance.
I might have accidentally implied academic significance, although that depends on what exactly academic means (for example, is something that may have significance on a basic university course considered academic just because it happens in university setting?). I'm pretty sure you can find a quotation to prove that.
> Well, I thought you were a fanboy of
> theory, so how about we come to some
> conclusion how his speaking from
> theoretical standpoint (acc. to you)
> is connected with real theory?
Hmm? I think Jouni (and others) made good points, even if there wasn't practical examples to demonstrate them.
By the way. I think you got that fanboy of theory thing I said wrong. It seems that most of the time you use the title I don't quite understand what you want.
> Well, you said that I tend to constantly
> interpret things as I want. You surely
> meant that my interpretation was wrong,
> correct? Hence the request to be
> fact-based.
It's not black and white. Interpreting your way is only wrong from the point of view that you may interpret differently than what the writer _thought_. If you just take the text and forget the thought behind it, there aren't wrong interpretations anymore, just different ones.
-JLarja
Topic | Posted By | Date |
---|---|---|
Hot Chips XXI Preview online | David Kanter | 2009/08/12 01:55 PM |
Hot Chips XXI Preview online | Groo | 2009/08/12 04:27 PM |
Hot Chips XXI Preview online | David Kanter | 2009/08/12 05:17 PM |
recent POWER7 info. from IBM | M.Isobe | 2009/08/16 01:04 AM |
Hot Chips XXI Preview online | slacker | 2009/08/12 07:11 PM |
Attending hot chips | David Kanter | 2009/08/12 07:53 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Daniel Bizó | 2009/08/12 11:05 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Wes Felter | 2009/08/13 10:17 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/13 02:25 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/13 02:48 PM |
How much IPC | E | 2009/08/14 12:16 AM |
How much IPC | hobold | 2009/08/14 02:03 AM |
How much IPC | a reader | 2009/08/15 09:26 AM |
How much IPC | hobold | 2009/08/15 09:58 AM |
How much IPC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/15 11:09 AM |
How much IPC | hobold | 2009/08/15 11:45 AM |
How much IPC | Euronymous | 2009/08/15 12:41 PM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/16 12:13 AM |
How much IPC | Anonymous | 2009/08/16 01:07 AM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/16 02:49 AM |
How much IPC | EduardoS | 2009/08/16 06:04 AM |
How much IPC | Anonymous | 2009/08/16 04:26 PM |
How much IPC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/16 06:49 AM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/16 08:32 AM |
How much IPC | EduardoS | 2009/08/16 06:09 AM |
How much IPC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/16 07:12 AM |
How much IPC | a reader | 2009/08/16 10:41 AM |
How much IPC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/16 11:21 AM |
How much IPC | none | 2009/08/16 12:30 PM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/16 10:32 PM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/16 11:09 PM |
How much IPC | none | 2009/08/17 01:29 AM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/17 04:25 AM |
Speculation and waste | David Kanter | 2009/08/17 09:03 AM |
Speculation and waste | ? | 2009/08/18 10:59 AM |
Speculation and waste | David Kanter | 2009/08/18 11:22 AM |
Speculation and waste | anon | 2009/08/19 01:52 AM |
Speculation and waste | TruePath | 2009/09/27 05:23 AM |
How much IPC | none | 2009/08/18 12:55 AM |
How much IPC | anon | 2009/08/18 01:27 AM |
How much IPC | anon | 2009/08/16 09:05 PM |
How much IPC | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/17 09:17 AM |
How much IPC | _Arthur | 2009/08/17 02:23 PM |
How much IPC | David Kanter | 2009/08/17 02:38 PM |
How much IPC | Michael S | 2009/08/17 02:39 PM |
How much IPC | David Kanter | 2009/08/17 02:48 PM |
How much IPC | Michael S | 2009/08/17 04:03 PM |
How much IPC | _Arthur | 2009/08/17 04:33 PM |
How much IPC | Michael S | 2009/08/17 04:56 PM |
How much IPC | _Arthur | 2009/08/17 07:48 PM |
How much IPC | Michael S | 2009/08/18 02:07 AM |
limits of sorting | hobold | 2009/08/18 03:26 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/18 04:26 AM |
limits of sorting | _Arthur | 2009/08/18 05:03 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 05:32 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/18 06:17 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 07:22 AM |
limits of sorting | _Arthur | 2009/08/18 07:57 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 08:30 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 08:45 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/18 08:50 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 09:09 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/18 09:33 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 09:53 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/18 10:28 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 11:01 AM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/18 05:40 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/18 06:22 PM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | David Kanter | 2009/08/18 06:49 PM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/19 04:56 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | David Kanter | 2009/08/19 07:26 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/19 07:47 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | slacker | 2009/08/19 08:52 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/19 09:10 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | slacker | 2009/08/19 10:36 PM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | slacker | 2009/08/19 10:45 PM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 04:28 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | slacker | 2009/08/20 05:32 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Aaron Spink | 2009/08/19 11:08 PM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Rob Thorpe | 2009/08/20 07:31 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | David Kanter | 2009/08/20 08:58 AM |
You work on EDA right Richard? | Rob Thorpe | 2009/08/20 03:10 PM |
limits of sorting | rwessel | 2009/08/18 06:56 PM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/18 10:11 PM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/18 10:25 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/19 05:32 AM |
limits of sorting | Rob Thorpe | 2009/08/19 06:12 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/19 06:46 AM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/19 07:43 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 06:47 AM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/20 07:20 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 10:12 PM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/21 01:08 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 04:15 AM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/22 05:24 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/22 06:27 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/22 07:39 PM |
limits of sorting | ? | 2009/08/23 04:07 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/23 04:53 AM |
limits of sorting | anonymous | 2009/08/23 10:42 AM |
useful link, thanks | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/23 04:23 PM |
limits of sorting | ? | 2009/09/04 03:05 AM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/23 08:26 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/24 06:13 AM |
wacky C++ features | a reader | 2009/08/24 08:59 PM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 02:18 AM |
wacky C++ features | a reader | 2009/08/25 06:04 AM |
wacky C++ features | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/25 09:21 PM |
wacky C++ features | none | 2009/08/26 04:47 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/26 07:09 AM |
wacky C++ features | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/27 05:25 AM |
wacky C++ features | Andi Kleen | 2009/08/24 11:06 PM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 02:10 AM |
wacky C++ features | Octoploid | 2009/08/25 02:40 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 04:15 AM |
wacky C++ features | Andi Kleen | 2009/08/25 06:58 AM |
thanks | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 07:07 AM |
thanks | Andi Kleen | 2009/08/25 10:28 AM |
wacky C++ features | anon | 2009/08/25 02:34 PM |
wacky C++ features | Andi Kleen | 2009/08/25 09:25 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/25 12:13 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 01:32 AM |
exception | a reader | 2009/08/25 06:32 AM |
exception | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 06:57 AM |
exception | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/25 07:30 AM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/25 07:56 PM |
correction | JasonB | 2009/08/25 08:47 PM |
correction | c++ | 2009/08/26 08:53 AM |
correction | JasonB | 2009/08/26 06:48 PM |
(new char[10]) does not have array type (NT) | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/27 05:27 AM |
correction | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/27 06:52 AM |
correction | c++ | 2009/08/27 08:29 AM |
comeau bugs and gcc features | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/27 08:51 AM |
comeau bugs and gcc features | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/27 10:28 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/26 08:17 AM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/26 06:46 PM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/27 08:41 AM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/27 08:33 PM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/28 12:24 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/28 12:27 AM |
wacky C++ features | Michael S | 2009/08/28 05:05 AM |
wacky C++ features | EduardoS | 2009/08/28 05:45 AM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/28 06:50 AM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/28 03:56 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/28 04:55 PM |
wacky C++ features | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/28 06:44 PM |
wacky C++ features | Konrad Schwarz | 2009/09/07 03:24 AM |
wacky C++ features | EduardoS | 2009/08/26 02:22 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/26 05:47 PM |
wacky C++ features | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/26 11:03 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/27 12:17 AM |
wacky C++ features | EduardoS | 2009/08/27 02:26 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/27 05:31 PM |
wacky C++ features | EduardoS | 2009/08/28 02:25 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/28 05:20 PM |
wacky C++ features | JasonB | 2009/08/27 08:56 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 06:33 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Michael S | 2009/08/21 07:07 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 07:33 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Paul | 2009/08/22 03:12 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | anon | 2009/08/21 10:18 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 10:45 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | anon | 2009/08/21 11:48 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Paul | 2009/08/22 03:25 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2009/08/22 06:02 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Paul | 2009/08/22 07:13 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | rwessel | 2009/08/24 02:09 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/22 04:28 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/22 05:22 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/22 05:52 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/22 06:47 PM |
Encapsulation | Konrad Schwarz | 2009/09/03 03:49 AM |
Encapsulation | anon | 2009/09/03 09:05 AM |
Encapsulation | ? | 2009/09/03 10:38 AM |
Encapsulation | Andi Kleen | 2009/09/04 12:41 AM |
Encapsulation | anon | 2009/09/04 06:24 AM |
Encapsulation | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/04 06:34 AM |
Encapsulation | Konrad Schwarz | 2009/09/07 02:28 AM |
Encapsulation | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/07 03:04 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | ? | 2009/09/03 10:51 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | no thanks | 2009/08/23 09:36 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/23 03:23 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/23 07:31 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/23 11:10 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/24 09:13 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/24 10:35 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/25 02:04 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/25 10:48 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/26 07:28 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/26 09:31 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/26 07:43 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | anon | 2009/08/26 12:48 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/26 02:28 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/26 07:06 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/27 02:44 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | Rob Thorpe | 2009/08/27 04:51 AM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/23 08:07 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | no thanks | 2009/08/23 08:44 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | JasonB | 2009/08/23 11:34 PM |
Windows vs Unix/Linux culture | anon | 2009/08/23 08:46 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 06:59 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 08:27 AM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/20 07:55 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 10:22 PM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/20 11:15 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 03:47 AM |
limits of sorting | ? | 2009/08/20 10:42 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 06:51 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/21 07:11 AM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/21 07:38 AM |
limits of sorting | dmsc | 2009/08/20 06:56 PM |
limits of sorting | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/20 07:20 PM |
limits of sorting | Rob Thorpe | 2009/08/20 07:09 AM |
limits of sorting | Aaron Spink | 2009/08/19 11:19 PM |
limits of sorting | JasonB | 2009/08/20 12:55 AM |
limits of sorting | Michael S | 2009/08/18 06:12 AM |
limits of sorting | hobold | 2009/08/18 06:55 AM |
limits of sorting | rwessel | 2009/09/08 01:52 PM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | Emil | 2009/09/08 06:06 PM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | rwessel | 2009/09/08 09:04 PM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | hobold | 2009/09/09 03:56 AM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/09 08:10 AM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | hobold | 2009/09/10 04:39 AM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/10 07:05 AM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | Potatoswatter | 2009/09/10 12:23 PM |
maximal theoretical sorting efficiency | dmsc | 2009/09/13 07:04 AM |
limits of sorting | Potatoswatter is back! | 2009/08/21 05:07 PM |
indeed it doesn't succeed in partitioning at all, but you get the idea ;) (NT) | Potatoswatter is back! | 2009/08/21 05:12 PM |
indeed it doesn't succeed in partitioning at all, but you get the idea ;) (NT) | Jouni Osmala | 2009/08/22 12:01 AM |
limits of sorting | hobold | 2009/08/22 06:25 AM |
limits of sorting | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/22 07:45 AM |
limits of sorting | David Kanter | 2009/08/22 09:16 AM |
limits of sorting | Jouni Osmala | 2009/08/22 11:01 AM |
Oops that was counting sort not bucket sort ;( | Jouni Osmala | 2009/08/22 11:07 AM |
close enough for my purposes | hobold | 2009/08/22 01:15 PM |
select vs. cmove | hobold | 2009/08/22 01:25 PM |
How much IPC | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2009/08/18 02:25 AM |
How much IPC | Vincent Diepeveen | 2009/08/19 05:46 AM |
How much IPC | _Arthur | 2009/08/19 08:32 AM |
How much IPC | hobold | 2009/08/18 03:17 AM |
How much IPC | Michael S | 2009/08/18 04:33 AM |
How much IPC | hobold | 2009/08/18 06:35 AM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/18 11:20 AM |
How much IPC | _Arthur | 2009/08/18 11:33 AM |
Nit picking | David Kanter | 2009/08/18 01:17 PM |
Nit picking | _Arthur | 2009/08/18 01:37 PM |
Nit picking | Michael S | 2009/08/18 02:02 PM |
Nit picking | S. Rao | 2009/08/18 04:02 PM |
Nit picking | anon | 2009/08/19 02:03 AM |
Nit picking | Michael S | 2009/08/18 01:53 PM |
Nit picking | JasonB | 2009/08/18 06:16 PM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/18 01:37 PM |
How much IPC | _Arthur | 2009/08/18 03:23 PM |
How much IPC | Matt Sayler | 2009/08/18 05:09 PM |
How much IPC | ? | 2009/08/18 10:59 PM |
nick's testcase | a reader | 2009/08/17 04:47 PM |
How much IPC | TruePath | 2009/09/27 09:00 AM |
Explicit dependency chains | David Kanter | 2009/09/30 06:56 PM |
How much IPC | TruePath | 2009/09/27 09:00 AM |
How much IPC | hobold | 2009/08/17 05:38 AM |
How much IPC | anon | 2009/08/16 08:59 PM |
Speeing Up Single Threads | TruePath | 2009/09/27 07:58 AM |
How much IPC | anon | 2009/08/15 07:01 PM |
How much IPC | EduardoS | 2009/08/16 06:06 AM |
How much IPC | sJ | 2009/08/16 08:48 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/14 02:26 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/14 03:04 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/21 02:43 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/21 03:08 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/21 03:33 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/22 07:57 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/22 10:04 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/25 11:33 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | ? | 2009/08/21 11:51 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/22 09:56 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/22 10:38 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | ? | 2009/08/23 03:05 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | EduardoS | 2009/08/23 03:28 AM |
Programming Larrabee | ? | 2009/08/23 05:48 AM |
Programming Larrabee | EduardoS | 2009/08/23 06:41 AM |
Programming Larrabee | anon | 2009/08/23 07:29 AM |
Programming Larrabee | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/23 06:47 AM |
Programming Larrabee | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/23 08:11 AM |
Programming Larrabee | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/23 11:49 PM |
Programming Larrabee | ? | 2009/08/23 08:59 AM |
Programming Larrabee | Potatoswatter | 2009/08/23 11:44 PM |
Programming Larrabee | hobold | 2009/08/24 05:41 AM |
Programming Larrabee | none | 2009/08/24 07:15 AM |
Programming Larrabee | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/24 07:33 AM |
Programming Larrabee | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/24 09:30 PM |
Programming Larrabee | none | 2009/08/25 01:53 AM |
Programming Larrabee | mpx | 2009/08/25 08:16 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Joe | 2009/08/24 08:38 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Gabriele Svelto | 2009/08/14 03:35 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/14 08:18 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | EduardoS | 2009/08/14 04:34 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/15 06:30 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/15 07:23 AM |
improving Netburst | AM | 2009/08/15 01:36 AM |
improving Netburst | anon | 2009/08/15 07:10 AM |
improving Netburst | Euronymous | 2009/08/15 08:35 AM |
improving Netburst | Michael S | 2009/08/15 01:18 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/21 03:10 PM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | anon | 2009/08/22 09:46 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/25 09:39 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | slacker | 2009/08/26 04:50 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/26 08:12 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | Jonathan Kang | 2009/08/26 08:45 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | someone | 2009/08/26 10:29 AM |
Power7 vs. single threaded performance and licensing | David Kanter | 2009/08/26 10:47 AM |
Not necessarily | Daniel Bizó | 2009/08/14 02:53 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | Thu Nguyen | 2009/08/25 03:05 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/25 05:47 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | hobold | 2009/08/25 06:50 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | G Webb | 2009/08/25 11:49 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | mpx | 2009/08/25 07:36 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/25 08:16 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | Jesper Frimann | 2009/08/27 08:18 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/27 10:53 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/27 12:00 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | a reader | 2009/08/27 03:21 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | David Kanter | 2009/08/27 08:32 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | a reader | 2009/08/28 07:45 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | hobold | 2009/08/28 04:00 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/28 05:51 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | hobold | 2009/08/28 06:44 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/28 07:10 AM |
Non Autopar submissions for Nehalem | IlleglWpns | 2009/08/28 09:41 AM |
Non Autopar submissions for Nehalem | David Kanter | 2009/08/28 10:07 AM |
Non Autopar submissions for Nehalem | someone | 2009/08/28 11:00 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | mas | 2009/08/25 11:25 PM |
An EV8 lite? (NT) | anon | 2009/08/26 08:21 AM |
An EV8 lite? => Piranha? | M. | 2009/08/30 03:54 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | Mark Roulo | 2009/08/27 05:51 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/27 06:03 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | a reader | 2009/08/27 08:55 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/27 10:58 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | a reader | 2009/08/27 03:11 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | Gabriele Svelto | 2009/08/27 11:17 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | someone | 2009/08/28 04:27 AM |
new POWER7 info .. | a reader | 2009/08/28 08:07 AM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/28 10:15 AM |
OOOE for low power | someone | 2009/08/28 10:39 AM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/28 12:55 PM |
OOOE for low power | Mark Roulo | 2009/08/28 02:16 PM |
OOOE for low power | Mark Roulo | 2009/08/28 02:44 PM |
Atom uarch | David Kanter | 2009/08/28 07:19 PM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/28 07:07 PM |
OOOE for low power | someone | 2009/08/28 03:18 PM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/29 12:55 AM |
OOOE for low power | someone | 2009/08/29 06:21 AM |
OOOE for low power | a reader | 2009/08/29 08:14 AM |
OOOE for low power | someone | 2009/08/29 08:56 AM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/29 09:08 AM |
OOOE for low power | Michael S | 2009/08/29 10:27 AM |
OOOE for low power | a reader | 2009/08/29 03:50 PM |
OOOE for low power | anonymous | 2009/08/29 06:17 PM |
OOOE for low power | Michael S | 2009/08/29 11:07 PM |
OOOE for low power | Jonathan Kang | 2009/09/01 04:44 AM |
OOOE for low power | Michael S | 2009/09/01 03:21 PM |
OOOE for low power | Mark Roulo | 2009/09/01 04:53 PM |
OOOE for low power | Wilco | 2009/09/02 01:27 AM |
OOOE for low power | Mark Roulo | 2009/09/02 07:46 AM |
OOOE for low power | Wilco | 2009/09/02 03:52 PM |
Define "emulate" (NT) | Michael S | 2009/09/02 10:44 PM |
Define "emulate" | Wilco | 2009/09/02 11:33 PM |
Define "emulate" | none | 2009/09/03 03:46 AM |
Define "emulate" | Adrian | 2009/09/03 09:45 AM |
Define "emulate" | Wilco | 2009/09/03 01:20 PM |
Define "emulate" | none | 2009/09/03 09:41 PM |
Define "emulate" | Wilco | 2009/09/04 02:30 AM |
low power ARM chips | Michael S | 2009/10/31 01:32 PM |
low power ARM chips | Gabriele Svelto | 2009/10/31 03:05 PM |
low power ARM chips | Michael S | 2009/10/31 03:45 PM |
low power ARM chips | t | 2009/10/31 04:21 PM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/29 09:07 AM |
OOOE for low power | someone | 2009/08/29 11:40 AM |
OOOE for low power | a reader | 2009/08/29 04:03 PM |
OOOE for low power | anonymous | 2009/08/29 06:13 PM |
OOOE for low power | someone | 2009/08/30 06:35 AM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/30 01:32 PM |
OOOE for low power | Matt Sayler | 2009/08/31 12:38 PM |
OOOE for low power | David Kanter | 2009/08/30 11:07 AM |
OOOE for low power | Michael S | 2009/08/29 10:44 AM |
TTM | Michael S | 2009/08/29 11:24 AM |
TTM | Foo_ | 2009/08/29 12:40 PM |
TTM | Michael S | 2009/08/29 01:10 PM |
TTM | anon | 2009/08/29 06:33 PM |
TTM | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/29 08:49 PM |
TTM | anon | 2009/08/30 05:07 AM |
TTM | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/30 08:31 PM |
Area, power and Atom | David Kanter | 2009/08/30 09:36 PM |
Area, power and Atom | Michael S | 2009/08/30 11:18 PM |
Area, power and Atom | a reader | 2009/08/31 07:44 AM |
Area, power and Atom | Michael S | 2009/08/31 11:19 AM |
Area, power and Atom | a reader | 2009/08/31 01:53 PM |
Area, power and Atom | anonymous | 2009/08/31 03:17 PM |
Area, power and Atom | Gabriele Svelto | 2009/08/31 02:41 PM |
64-bit disabled Atoms | Foo_ | 2009/09/02 03:38 AM |
64-bit disabled Atoms | Robert David Graham | 2009/09/02 11:56 AM |
64-bit disabled Atoms | anon | 2009/09/02 01:14 PM |
64-bit disabled Atoms | anonymous | 2009/09/02 03:30 PM |
TTM | Michael S | 2009/08/30 10:49 PM |
TTM | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/31 10:23 PM |
TTM | Paul | 2009/08/30 05:38 AM |
TTM | Paul | 2009/08/30 05:40 AM |
TTM | Mark Roulo | 2009/08/30 08:50 AM |
TTM | Paul | 2009/08/30 08:54 AM |
TTM | Mark Roulo | 2009/08/30 09:16 AM |
TTM | Foo_ | 2009/09/02 03:31 AM |
OOOE for low power | Rob Thorpe | 2009/08/30 08:19 AM |
OOOE for low power | Michael S | 2009/08/29 10:16 AM |
OOOE for low power | Jukka Larja | 2009/08/29 08:40 PM |
OOOE for low power | Michael S | 2009/08/29 11:04 PM |
OOOE and cache/mem sizes | Richard Cownie | 2009/08/28 04:30 PM |
OOOE and cache/mem sizes | Linus Torvalds | 2009/08/31 09:53 PM |
OOOE and cache/mem sizes | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/01 03:15 AM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | AM | 2009/09/01 07:35 AM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/01 07:57 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | AM | 2009/09/02 12:34 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/02 04:35 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Martin Høyer Kristiansen | 2009/09/02 05:19 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | anon | 2009/09/02 08:43 PM |
OOOE and clock rate | AM | 2009/09/03 01:52 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/03 06:34 AM |
OOOE impacts | AM | 2009/09/04 01:04 AM |
OOOE impacts | David Kanter | 2009/09/04 09:12 AM |
OOOE impacts | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/06 11:16 AM |
OOOE impacts | AM | 2009/09/07 02:47 AM |
OOOE impacts | Martin Høyer Kristiansen | 2009/09/07 05:03 AM |
Does IBM lie about PPC603 being OoO chip? | AM | 2009/09/08 02:13 AM |
No, but... | Michael S | 2009/09/08 06:05 AM |
No, but... | hobold | 2009/09/09 04:09 AM |
OOOE impacts | JS | 2009/09/07 05:34 AM |
Are Sandpile and others wrong about 0.28 um? | AM | 2009/09/08 02:12 AM |
OOOE impacts | someone | 2009/09/08 05:43 AM |
OOOE impacts | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/07 06:48 AM |
OOOE costs | David Kanter | 2009/09/07 11:07 AM |
OOOE impacts | AM | 2009/09/08 02:11 AM |
OOOE impacts | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/10 12:53 AM |
OOOE impacts | AM | 2009/09/11 03:35 AM |
OOOE impacts | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/11 07:38 AM |
OOOE impacts | AM | 2009/09/12 04:06 AM |
OOOE impacts | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/12 10:36 PM |
OOOE impacts | AM | 2009/09/14 03:39 AM |
OOOE impacts | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/14 05:18 AM |
if-ex distance | AM | 2009/09/15 04:16 AM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/19 02:54 AM |
small addendum | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/19 08:51 PM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/20 05:54 AM |
small addendum | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/20 12:16 PM |
small addendum | Thiago Kurovski | 2009/09/20 03:51 PM |
small addendum | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/20 08:21 PM |
small addendum | Thiago Kurovski | 2009/09/21 05:59 AM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/21 02:14 AM |
small addendum | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/21 09:21 PM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/22 02:01 AM |
small addendum | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/22 10:31 PM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/23 07:35 AM |
small addendum | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/23 09:31 PM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/23 11:13 PM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/24 08:39 PM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/09/25 04:18 AM |
Back to bits | Michael S | 2009/09/25 06:14 AM |
Back to bits | Thiago Kurovski | 2009/09/25 10:24 AM |
Back to bits | Wilco | 2009/09/25 02:18 PM |
Back to bits | Thiago Kurovski | 2009/09/26 08:12 AM |
Back to bits | Michael S | 2009/09/26 07:54 AM |
Back to bits | Thiago Kurovski | 2009/09/26 08:05 AM |
Back to bits | Michael S | 2009/09/26 08:16 AM |
Agree, with very minor change. | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/25 08:37 PM |
Back to bits | AM | 2009/09/26 05:16 AM |
Back to bits | Michael S | 2009/09/26 08:13 AM |
OT metadiscussion | David Kanter | 2009/09/25 11:23 AM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/09/26 04:55 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/25 10:33 PM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/09/26 04:50 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/27 01:16 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Michael S | 2009/09/27 03:58 AM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/09/28 03:07 AM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/09/28 02:43 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/28 11:45 PM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/09/30 02:13 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/01 12:34 AM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/10/01 03:05 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/01 11:38 PM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/10/03 06:19 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/04 02:38 AM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/10/04 07:27 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/04 10:48 PM |
OT metadiscussion | AM | 2009/10/05 06:13 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/05 10:36 PM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/06 03:37 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/07 02:15 AM |
About teaching | anon | 2009/10/07 11:39 AM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/08 02:11 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/09 03:10 AM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/09 04:40 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/09 08:02 PM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/09 10:24 PM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/10 09:50 PM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/12 01:02 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/12 09:51 PM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/13 03:06 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/13 10:33 PM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/14 02:36 AM |
About teaching | Jukka Larja | 2009/10/14 07:19 PM |
About teaching | AM | 2009/10/15 03:22 AM |
About teaching | Salvatore De Dominicis | 2009/10/12 01:23 AM |
About teaching | Dean Kent | 2009/10/12 11:25 AM |
About teaching | Salvatore De Dominicis | 2009/10/13 01:11 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Seni | 2009/09/26 05:26 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Wilco | 2009/09/26 07:08 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/27 01:18 AM |
OT metadiscussion | Michael S | 2009/09/27 04:12 AM |
small addendum | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/24 09:04 PM |
small addendum | AM | 2009/09/25 04:04 AM |
extra stage in EV6 | AM | 2009/09/26 05:29 AM |
PPC603 does OoOE | hobold | 2009/09/08 04:40 AM |
OOOE impacts | someone | 2009/09/08 04:39 AM |
EV6 | AM | 2009/09/09 03:33 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Seni | 2009/09/02 08:11 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Linus Torvalds | 2009/09/02 05:48 PM |
OOOE and clock rate | anon | 2009/09/02 10:55 PM |
OOOE and clock rate | Wilco | 2009/09/02 11:44 PM |
OOOE and clock rate | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/03 12:02 AM |
OOOE and Itanium | AM | 2009/09/03 12:27 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Martin Høyer Kristiansen | 2009/09/03 02:41 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | anon | 2009/09/03 12:12 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Wilco | 2009/09/03 01:10 AM |
POWER6 skewed pipeline | Paul A. Clayton | 2009/09/03 10:22 AM |
POWER6 skewed pipeline | Anon4 | 2009/09/03 06:00 PM |
OOOE and clock rate | Mr. Camel | 2009/09/03 02:40 AM |
OOOE and clock rate | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/03 05:42 AM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/01 08:01 AM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | AM | 2009/09/02 12:32 AM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/02 06:49 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/03 12:40 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2009/09/03 12:45 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/03 02:18 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2009/09/03 02:55 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/03 03:28 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2009/09/03 04:29 AM |
Amount of cache per core matters,and mem bandwith too (NT) | Jouni Osmala | 2009/09/03 06:44 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | rwessel | 2009/09/03 01:31 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/04 01:24 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | anon | 2009/09/03 05:40 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | a reader | 2009/09/03 08:20 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | anon | 2009/09/03 04:57 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | Jonathan Kang | 2009/09/03 01:30 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | David Kanter | 2009/09/03 03:38 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | Jonathan Kang | 2009/09/04 07:16 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | anon | 2009/09/03 05:07 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/04 01:20 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Jonathan Kang | 2009/09/04 07:13 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Dan Downs | 2009/09/04 07:38 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Dan Downs | 2009/09/05 03:36 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | Anon | 2009/09/05 01:44 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/04 11:12 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/04 01:18 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | anon | 2009/09/04 07:18 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/04 10:53 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | anon | 2009/09/05 03:06 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | AM | 2009/09/05 08:14 AM |
LRB choice of P54 - Layout? | Anonymous | 2009/09/03 01:40 PM |
LRB choice of P54 - Layout? | anonymous | 2009/09/03 02:54 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | Jukka Larja | 2009/09/03 08:58 PM |
LRB choice of P54 | mpx | 2009/09/04 03:07 AM |
LRB choice of P54 | anon | 2009/09/03 01:02 AM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | Gian-Carlo Pascutto | 2009/09/03 12:40 AM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | Mark Roulo | 2009/09/03 03:26 PM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | Michael S | 2009/09/03 04:14 PM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | Mark Roulo | 2009/09/04 09:05 AM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | Jonathan Kang | 2009/09/04 09:59 AM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | Michael S | 2009/09/05 08:58 AM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | James | 2009/09/07 02:15 AM |
Larrabee: Pentium vs 486 vs 386 | Mark Roulo | 2009/09/07 06:44 PM |
OOOE and pipe length etc. | Michael S | 2009/09/03 04:42 PM |
LRB core | AM | 2009/09/04 01:09 AM |
LRB core | Michael S | 2009/09/04 04:07 AM |
LRB core | anon | 2009/09/04 07:27 PM |
LRB core | Michael S | 2009/09/05 09:12 AM |
LRB core | anon | 2009/09/05 10:03 PM |
reasons for split I/D L1 caches | Michael S | 2009/09/06 03:10 AM |
reasons for split I/D L1 caches | anon | 2009/09/06 05:32 AM |
reasons for split I/D L1 caches | ? | 2009/09/06 09:35 AM |
reasons for split I/D L1 caches | megol | 2009/09/06 02:39 PM |
reasons for split I/D L1 caches | ? | 2009/09/07 03:20 AM |
reasons for split I/D L1 caches | anon | 2009/09/07 05:25 AM |
cache hinting | ? | 2009/09/07 06:10 AM |
cache hinting | anon | 2009/09/07 06:35 AM |
cache hinting | ? | 2009/09/07 08:10 AM |
cache hinting | anon | 2009/09/07 08:49 AM |
cache hinting | ? | 2009/09/07 09:37 AM |
Split and unified caches | David Kanter | 2009/09/06 12:38 PM |
Split and unified caches | anon | 2009/09/06 10:15 PM |
Split and unified caches | Michael S | 2009/09/06 11:40 PM |
Split and unified caches | anon | 2009/09/07 01:24 AM |
Split and unified caches | David Kanter | 2009/09/06 11:51 PM |
Split and unified caches | anon | 2009/09/07 01:13 AM |
LRB core | AM | 2009/09/04 11:08 PM |
LRB core | Linus Torvalds | 2009/09/05 09:47 AM |
LRB core | David Kanter | 2009/09/04 12:23 PM |
LRB core | Anon | 2009/09/04 05:32 PM |
LRB core | David Kanter | 2009/09/04 09:15 PM |
LRB core | Michael S | 2009/09/05 09:21 AM |
OOOE and cache/mem sizes | a reader | 2009/09/01 08:19 AM |
OOOE and cache/mem sizes | Richard Cownie | 2009/09/01 08:43 AM |
snapdraon? | Michael S | 2009/08/28 05:10 AM |
snapdraon? | a reader | 2009/08/28 07:51 AM |
Thanks (NT) | Michael S | 2009/08/29 11:53 AM |
snapdraon? | Paul | 2009/08/28 12:12 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | EduardoS | 2009/08/27 02:41 PM |
new POWER7 info .. | Jesper Frimann | 2009/08/28 04:03 AM |
Single threaded performance | David Kanter | 2009/08/28 09:52 AM |
Hot Chips XXI Preview online | hobold | 2009/08/13 06:30 AM |